Saturday, June 14, 2014

Good hand-held cameras for low-light???

Q. ok... so here's the thing... a few of my friends are in a band and i do most of the pictures for them when they play local shows.the places they play allow little hand-helds but not big Dslrs. so what i need is a little handheld camera that works REALLY good in low light (the one i have you cant even see the picture in the dark until after you shoot it, i'd like to see the picture BEFORE i take it on the screen), has a good amount of megapixels and a good optical zoom. i know I'm kinda picky but this is coming out of my own pocket so i need it as close to perfect as possible :)

P.S. im leaning more towards a Canon or a Nikon but if you have any other good suggestions write them down and i'll definitely consider them!!

thanks soooo much :)
yea... if you just wanna tell me about how it doesnt exist or its to expense... please dont answer... im not really worried about the expense of it, just the quality. and i KNOW they have cameras that work well in low-light so dont give me that either

please & thanks :)
i can live without the high optical zoom and megapixels but it would be nice


Answer
Photography in low-light without a flash requires a fast lens and a higher than usual ISO. Since compact digital cameras are burdened with a relatively slow lens (f3.5, 4.6) they are not suitable for hand-held low-light photography. The tiny sensor they employ is also a major handicap since their performance at higher ISO settings is rather poor, even with noise reduction programs.

The only really viable option is a DSLR with a fast lens - 50mm f1.4 or 85mm f1.4 or a zoom lens of, perhaps, 17-55mm f2.8 or the 24-70mm f2.8 or the 70-200mm f2.8 - all with a constant aperture which is needed as you zoom in or out. A DSLR also has a sensor that is as much as 15 times larger than the sensor in a compact digital camera.

Looking at my FotoSharp (http://www.fotosharp.com) Day & Night Exposure Guide, Scene # 13 shows settings for "Night club with dim lights"

ISO 1600
f1.4 @ 1/30 sec.
f2 @ 1/15 sec.
f2.8 @ 1/8 sec.

ISO 3200
f1.4 @ 1/60 sec.
f2 @ 1/30 sec.
f2.8 @ 1/15 sec.

How about Scene # 10 - "Home interiots, average light"

ISO 800
f1.4 @ 1/125 sec.
f2 @ 1/60 sec.
f2.8 @ 1/30 sec.

ISO 1600
f1.4 @ 1/250 sec.
f2 @ 1/125 sec.
f2.8 @ 1/60 sec.

As you can easily see lens speed is a major factor as is ISO.

Good luck and I hope you find a suitable camera for what you want to do.

best DSLR lens for shooting video in low light?




Malamut


I have a Canon 7D and im looking to get a good lens for shooting in low light, does anyone have any suggestions? on a budget so price is important. Thanks in advance


Answer
the best digital camera for low light is the kind that has a built-in flash.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Digital Cameras!!!?




chad g


ok...i have recently been interested in digital photography and i have been wanting a digital camera for a loong time...so my mom finally agreed to get me one for christmass [[whitch is a long time away]] but i have no idea how to choose what kind of camerea i should get!! I know that i have to look at a lot of different thingd like megapixels and stuff like that...but honestly...i have no clue what im looking for...and im only a kid...so i dont want to be confused about all of the technecial stuff!!

Does any one have any advice or personal opinions about what kind of camera i should get???

Oh...and if it helps any...i live in columbus. ohio...so i may depend on what i get by what store i can get it from!!

Please Help!?


~Chad



Answer
Hey! Iâm a kid too! If kids like us, we MUST get a camera with image stabilization. Very few cameras with a cheap price has image stabilization. And I really advice you to go for Canon A570 IS.

It has the advanced Canon Optical Image Stabilization and has one of the best processors in the world, Digic III (3). It has a 2.5â screen and a proper viewfinder. It also can put in extra lens and a slave flash. Its f-stop is also considered good around its class (f/2.8).

This allows more light to go in to the lens in low light conditions. This is called aperture. It also has shutter and aperture priority.

Its Specs :

7.1 MP
O.I.S
SD Memory Card
AA Batteries
4x Optical Zoom

And so onâ¦.

Digital camera/photography question?




amy


I want to start teaching myself photography because i cant afford to take a class in it. My question is, what is a really good digital camera for that....good quality but i am a college kid on her own so i'd like to keep the price low. Also, what do people use to edit photos for example make some things color in a black and white picture? Is it just photoshop?


Answer
For camera's......... the Fuji range of Digital Compacts do a pretty good job, but of course you can't change the lenses or stick filters on them.
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/fuji_a500.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/fuji_a700.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pr/fuji_02222007_a820-a900_pr.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/fuji_f20.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/fuji_f30.html

The next step up would be the Super-Zoom / Ultra-Zoom offered by Fuji + Olympus..... which are a sort of half way between a Digital Compact + a Digital SLR (like used for serious photography, but not as costly)........ I believe you can get a few accessories like filters for them, but can't use different lens on them.... which is kinda a good thing because I've heard that Digital SLR's can get a build-up of dust + other crap where the camera & lens connect to each other, and eventually need sending away for servicing as a result.
Here's the reviews for them:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/fuji_s5200.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/fuji_s700.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/fuji_s6000fd.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/sp500.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/sp510.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/sp550.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/s9000.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/s9100.html

To edit Photo's, there isn't just photoshop.... there's a huge choice out there..... some are free, some aren't... here's a few of them:

Picture Publisher 10
http://www.amazon.com/Picture-Publisher-10-Digital-Camera/dp/B00005Q5IN
This is what I use..... mine came free with the Webhosting package I use.

Paint Shop Pro
http://www.corel.com/servlet/Satellite/us/en/Product/1155872554948
Demo versions often to be found on Magazine CD-ROM's, or older versions given away free on them.

PICASA
http://picasa.google.com/
A free one, made by GOOGLE (not tried it myself)

SERIF Photoplus 6
http://www.freeserifsoftware.com/software/PhotoPlus/default.asp

GIMP
http://www.gimp.org/
Freeware... GNU public licensed

Adobe Photoshop CS3
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/index.html
This one is a little bit pricey

Adobe Photoshop Elements
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopelwin/
A not quite as pricey version




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Canon Rebel Xti Kit Lens Replacement?




Anna M


Hey all,
I have a Canon Xti and I've recently been on the market looking for an upgrade for the original kit lens. Came across the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Would this be a good replacement for the kit lens?
Or if not, any other suggestions?
I'm a photography student, so I wouldn't call myself a professional by all means.
And as a student you could probably guess that I'm on a very tight budget.
I'm very interested in street photography and photojournalism, if that helps distinguish a lens.
Any input will be very much appreciated.
Thanks!



Answer
the EF 50mm f/1.8 II should serve you well for the purposes you mention especially if you are good at manually zooming (moving yourself and the camera alot)

consult your teacher also

Need a recommendation on a good quality kit lens replacement?




Joshua


So i am buying a Canon t3i this week, but i would really like a good kit lens replacement. with the camera i will be mostly taking pictures of my kids, both when they're playing and for portraits. I will also be using the camera to take pictures of product for web sites and doing product video and article reviews as well as tutorial guides. i will be taking up-close and kids playing indoors the most. i will not be taking very many far-away pictures or videos. I am a beginner and would like some guidance/recommendations on lenses. i would like to stay under 1000 USD for the lenses only. thanks in advance.


Answer
The kit lens is more useful than you, or, it seems, people on here seem to think, give it enough light and it will perform well.

It's only when you want to take pictures in low light that the aperture limitation will start to show and be a problem.

A lens of similar focal lengths(s), but a wider aperture is a good place to start. The Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 is a good lens, but not so good for landscapes especially on an APS sized sensor, you may want wider, which is where the kit lens comes in. When bought with a camera the kit lens will be the cheapest most useful general purpose lens you will ever buy.

Practice with that first and see which direction your going in, Macro, Telephoto, wider aperture. Buy lenses, and any other gear for that matter, for a definite reason not just because a 'professional' on YA said that's the lens you need (and that includes me). Everybody works differently. When you find yourself saying, I wish I could get closer (Macro Lens), or I wish I could reach further (Telephoto Lens), or I wish I had less noise in these low light shots (Wider Aperture Lenses), that's the time to buy the lens. But then you know why you need the lens and you won't have to ask anybody, you've identified YOUR need.

Chris




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What makes a good Digital Camera?




Connor


What is it that makes a Digital Camera good?, Is it the amount of megapixels, or it's features, I don't know, what is it? Also what is likely to be the best Camera on the market as of right now?


Answer
There are 2 things which combine to make a good digital camera. The first is the sensor. Physical size of sensor is much more important than number of megapixels. The bigger the sensor, the clearer the image and the less noise you will get, especially at higher ISO settings. The second is the quality of the lens. There's no point in having great "features" if the lens distorts them.

Megapixels are pretty much irrelevant when you get beyond about 8. A 7.2 megapixel camera can produce a 20"x16" enlargement at 150 pixels per inch. Just how big do you want to go? As you cram more pixels on to the same sensor size, the individual pixels get smaller, so it gets much more difficult and expensive to make them more sensitive to light, which means they don't perform well in low light. That's why most cheap compacts with high megapixel counts give rubbish results at high ISO settings in low light.

Those reasons combined is why DSLR cameras outperform most compacts, apart from one or two expensive large-sensor compacts. DSLR cameras have large sensors and interchangeable high-quality lenses.

So the best image quality is actually going to come from a Hasselblad with huge sensor and fantastic lenses. But that is going to cost many thousands and it will be huge and very heavy. Being the "best" camera for image quality does not make it the best camera for most people.

Even if we stick to the more affordable standard DSLR cameras, there are several levels. The best image quality right now comes from full frame DSLR cameras. The Nikon D800 is the best out there right now. But that is still expensive. It is also big, heavy and needs a big, powerful computer to handle the 36MP pictures.

Of course the D800 isn't going to be "best" if you want small, lightweight and portable. It also doesn't have the fastest motor drive around, so may not be best for fast-moving sports photography. So what is technically the "best" camera for image quality is not necessarily the best for you. You have to take into consideration your budget, what you want to use the camera for and how big and heavy you are willing to put up with.

Digital cameras and Slr possible improvements?




Tony


are there any possible improvements in any area, that either of these cameras need?


Answer
Although highly doubtful, fewer pixels in compact digital cameras would be an improvement. Canon has acknowledged this by reducing the pixel count in their G11 which replaced the G10 from 14.6mp in the G10 to 10.0mp in the G11. Fewer pixels occupying the same sized sensor means slightly bigger pixels and better performance in low-light and at higher ISO settings. However, after years of marketing "More megapixels is better!" manufacturers will find it difficult to explain to the consumer why fewer megapixels is suddenly "better".

In the DSLR realm things are beginning to get interesting. Sony's introduction of their Translucent Mirror Technology in their SLT A33 and A55 may force Pentax, Nikon, Olympus, Canon and Panasonic to re-think the traditional DSLR. At 7fps shooting with the SLT A33 and 10fps shooting with the SLT A55, continuous full-time auto focus, no mirror black-out, 2D or 3D sweep panorama and Auto HDR Sony has a lot to brag about. How the other manufacturers respond to these Sony cameras will be interesting to say the least.

Add the E-V-I-L (Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens) cameras from Sony, Olympus and Panasonic into the mix and the traditional DSLR comes under further attack. If these cameras begin taking market share from sales of traditional DSLRs among first-time buyers it will be interesting to see how Pentax, Canon and Nikon respond.

Features normally found in only pro-grade DSLRs (Nikon D3, Canon 1D) will begin trickling down to the consumer-grade DSLRs at a faster rate to offer the entry-level buyers more "bang for the buck" at a cost comparable to current DSLR entry-level prices. The introduction of aids in the viewfinder for manually focusing will force other manufacturers to follow suit.

Its going to be interesting to watch what happens over the next couple of years.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Interchangeable camera vs DSLR?




Guru


I am really confused wether to buy a DSLR or Interchangeable P&S or P&S .Kindly give me some inputs on these points

1-I will be using it mainly to click portrait pics making the back ground blur ( i guess interchangeable lens is handy for this)
2- Click wild life, so i need something that is fast, i know DSLR is fast, does the interchangeable camera be fast too? traditional P&S will be slow as it needs to focus.
3. Close up, the P&S will allow me to click the pics of the subjects even if the lens are touching it using the macro feature, for the DSLR and interchangeable i need to buy a different set of lens which i dont want to!

what to do? whats the main diff between the DSLR and Interchangeable ones with the above points as baseline? i am not much concerned abt the clarity the DSLR gives. PLease help!



Answer
I am going to assume by interchangeable camera you are talking about cameras like the Sony Nex 5 or the Olympus Pen cameras. If so then there is no difference on what kinds of lenses you will need. If you want macro you will need a macro lens. If you want wildlife you will need a long telephoto lens and if you want a shallow depth of field you will need a large aperture lens.

Where the big difference lies is in the size of the cameras and the availability of lenses. A DSLR will simply have many more lens choices as well as choices of other accessories.

Unless you are looking for something small then a DSLR is the way to go.

Camera Advice (mirrorless vs DLSR) for Beginner?




pibe


I want to learn about photography and how to take good pictures in a more manual-type setting. I know that cameras have great auto modes these days, but I want to learn about Aperture, Shutter speed and ISO. My price range goes up to about $600 USD and Amazon has great prices right now.

Right now, I am looking at a Nikon D5100 DLSR camera with a stock 18-55 mm lens. Thoughts? It's currently selling for around $550 USD on Amazon.

I have heard that compact system (mirrorless) cameras are taking over, and that DLSRs will soon become obsolete. Can anyone shed some light on the subject? If I were to look at a mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses and highly accessible manual settings, what are my best options?

-Pibe



Answer
hi Pibe,

There are many strong opinions, about the Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Cameras (MILC) also called Compact System Cameras (CSC) or Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens (EVIL) cameras. As you can already see, mostly from DSLR users very resistant to change, most of whom have not even used this new technology.

The differences between the two types is primarily the viewing system. True DSLR type cameras use an optical system, most use pentaprisms or pentamirrors with movable mirrors that flip out of the way each time an exposure is made. This is a Reflex viewing system, the "R" in SLR and DSLR camera designation (D=Digital, S=Single, L=Lens, R=Reflex).

MILC models eliminate complexity, size and weight of an optical viewing system by using an electronic viewfinder. The display shows images directly from the sensor that records the image like the method used for phone cameras, tablets, electronic readers, etc.

ADVANTAGES of MILC - Smaller & lighter cameras models. In addition the cameras are less complicated allowing simpler and more compact lens designs, especially for Wide Angle lenses (So far it seems that only the Micro Four Thirds lens models from Olympus and Panasonic take significant advantage this capability) and, for technical reasons, virtually all MILC cameras can accept a vast arrays of affordable "legacy" lenses from most brands of earlier 35mm film cameras via adapters.

DISADVANTAGES of MILC -The chief disadvantages of MILC cameras are shutter lag, a brief delay between pressing the shutter release and recording the image, and occasional problems with the quality of viewfinder image and, if the camera lacks an eye level viewfinder, composing images on the viewfinder in bright light or glare may be difficult because the viewfinder is hard to view. If you have tried to use a phone camera at the beach or in other brightly lit situations you have probably experienced similar problems.

All MILC cameras are Digital because digital technology is what makes the camera design practical. They are true Single Lens designs because that designation indicates that a single lens is used for VIEWING and TAKING the photographs.

The two best selling brands of DSLR cameras are Nikon and Canon but both companies were slow to bring out MILC cameras. MILC's were first introduced by Panasonic, followed almost immediately by Olympus. Both of these companies support the Micro Four Thirds (MFT) standard and share some technology. They are partners in joint development of the Four Thirds DSLR and Micro Four Thirds "open" specifications (MFT is an extension of the original Four Thirds standard allowing for a smaller lens mounting system).

Sony is another very important MILC camera maker. They use the NEX designation for their own proprietary lens system. I feel that Sony has not taken advantage of the potential for smaller lenses other than the ability to mount lenses from cinema cameras on their system.

I am doing a personal research project on MILC camera models and have identified cameras and lenses for the MFT and Nex systems.

So far I have found 19 current MFT cameras with about 30 MFT lenses (not counting improved versions of lenses that have replaced early designs), 3 "Converter" lenses, a 3D lens and a Fixed Focus/Fixed Aperture "Body Cap" Lens. In addition, virtually all lenses manufactured for Four Thirds DSLR cameras can be used with MFT models via an adapter that provides full metering & auto focusing functions (there are approximately 30~40 additional lens available from the Four Thirds lens standard).

Here's a link to an extensive explanation of Micro Four Thirds cameras and lens systems -

http://www.four-thirds.org/en/microft/body.html#c=INDEX

The Sony Nex product line, to my knowledge the second most widely developed MILC system, currently has 4 camera models, 11 lenses and 2 Conversion lenses. I have had a hard time interpreting Sony's published information concerning lenses using their "A Mount" (Alpha DSLR) and "G Mount" lenses but it appears these are fully compatible with the Nex models (via an adapter) giving about 10 more lenses for that system.

Here's a good MILC kit from a reputable dealer you could consider this option -

http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-Interchangeable-Digital-Camera-14-42mm/dp/B004O3N8H6/ref=sr_1_72?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1355609643&sr=1-72&keywords=micro+four+thirds+lenses

This includes a recently discontinued Olympus MFT camera model with TWO lenses and basic accessories. It has the full range of controls and has an eye level viewfinder available as an accessory.

Hope that helps. Contact me (from my email in profile) if you need more information.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Friday, June 13, 2014

which one should i buy, nikon D90 or canon 50D? It is my first DSLR. help!?




cvl1986





Answer
Nikon D90 DX 12.3MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S VR DX Nikkor Zoom Lens

Awesome!
I just got the D90 two days ago as an upgrade from my D50. It takes amazing outdoor, daytime action shots. My kids at soccer practice were crisp, frozen perfectly mid kick. When combined with a speedflash, it takes amazing bounce-flash shots--perfect clarity, beautiful colors, no shadows, natural. I haven't used it in dark settings without the speedflash...ever since I began using an external flash, I have never gone back...and I only use the SB400, but get amazing shots.

The 18-105 lens is okay (I give it maybe 6 or 7 out of 10). Very light, fairly versatile, and just a hair soft maybe. I will buy the 18-200 soon just to avoid some of the lens switching. If I weren't so hyped on getting this camera I would have waited to buy "body only" with the 18-200 lens for added versatility.

I don't normally do in-camera editing...I use photoshop...but this camera does some neat stuff. Correcting red-eye and picture alignment--very easy. All menu options are incredibly easy. My kids were highly amused by the fish-eye adjustment, though I doubt I will ever use that.

Fits with a little extra room in the lowepro a200 slingshot with the kit lens attached.

All in all, it is a JOY to take pictures with this camera. My wife is probably a little jealous that I haven't parted with it for the last 38 hours or so!

I bought it from Computizone.com for $1240 with free shipping.

Upgrade from P&S to DSLR: Nikon D90 or Pentax K-x?




questionsa


I'm having a hard time choosing between the two. If you have any reasons why I should/shouldn't choose one or the other, please let me know. If you have an advice on lenses, that would be helpful, too. Thanks!


Answer
just go with ....Nikon D90 DX 12.3MP Digital SLR Camera which is really good. it is better than pentax k-x.

* 12.3-megapixel DX-format CMOS imaging sensor
* 5.8x AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens included
* D-Movie Mode; Cinematic 24fps HD with sound
* 3-inch super-density 920,000-dot color LCD monitor
* Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D90-Digital-18-105mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B001ENOZY4/?tag=pntsa-20

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=nikon+d90+camera&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&BI=6846&KBID=7390




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Which is a good semi professional camera and lens to buy?




Deepu


I am teaching myself photography as a hobby and would like to make it my second profession eventually. I would like to go in for a DSLR camera (second hand (body only) costing around 400 dollars (300euros)) and a good lens for portrait and landscape.

I would prefer a Nikon or a Canon camera. Please advice.



Answer
You can find the lens best suited for portrait by visiting the canon web site. Also the Landscape lens (a wide angle) is NOT the same as a portrait lens.

Why don't you buy the cheapest camera with a short (range) zoom lens and go from their. Then you could have your scenic lens at one end and your portrait lens at the other end!

What SLR camera lens to buy?




Jacob


I just purchased a canon t2i slr camera and i am a beginner to slr photography. the kit lens that came with the camera is an 18-55 image stabilizing canon lens. the lens is nice but id like to change to one with more zoom. id like to find a lens that is versatile enough for most occasions. also, what is image stabilization and is it worth the extra money if im not shooting video.

thanks



Answer
You probably don't want to hear this but you have the best lens for general purpose photog., 50mm is portrait. What you NEED to do is get the fastest lens you can, even if it is 30 years old and costs 20 bucks and the camera only works in manual.

Think about the fastest 50mm you can get, a new Canon AF 1.8 should be about a 100, you won't believe what a step up you will make in looking professional.

I know your newbie, but nothing was said as a joke, very serous. I can't afford the new VR (Nikon, vibration reduction they call it same thing). I buy really old manual lenses and do very fine, better than anyone I know personally. Let me leave you with a true tip to dwell on, the fastest NEW lens Nikon makes is the 50mm 1.2, always was. Guess what, it is totally manual! Of course it is a professionals lens, here it is so you know I'm serious - have fun- learn- save!

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/36976-USA/Nikon_1435_NIKKOR_Normal_50mm_f_1_2.html




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What type of Nikon Camera/Lens to buy?




Stephanie


I am looking for a nice Nikon camera to take pictures with. Probably the smallest Nikon that you can attach different lenses to & preferably one that doesn't weigh 100 pounds. I am also looking for a fisheye lens. Any recommendations? and If you have any, where to get them?


Answer
the smallest and lightest DSLR camera is the Nikon D3100

for fisheye lenses, the cheapest one I know of is a Rokinon fisheye lens for around $300
a good, quality fisheye lens will cost anywhere from $700-1500 or so

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/730210-REG/Nikon_25472_D3100_Digital_SLR_Camera.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/769466-REG/Rokinon_FE8M_N_8mm_Ultra_Wide_Angle.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/300487-USA/Nikon_2148_10_5mm_f_2_8G_ED_DX.html

Nikon Camera Question?




blg876


So, tomorrow is black friday and there is a camera for $80 at target. It is the Nikon s205. I've been trying info. on it on the internet but i can't find anything on it. So, I don't know if I should get the nikon s205 or the s3000.The guy at target said the s205 is the new version of the s3000 but I can't find the s205 at any other stores so my dad thinks it's just a target special. They look the same but I don't know what the difference is. So which one should I get cause i really don't know and i have to decide soon. And does the s205 only come in the red?
Thanks!!!



Answer
Nikon D3000 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera
*10.2-megapixel DX-format imaging sensor for prints up to 20 x 30 inches
*Includes 3x 18-55mm Zoom-Nikkor VR Image Stabilization lens
*Nikon EXPEED image processing; in-camera image editing and Active D-Lighting
*3.0-inch color LCD screen; 170-degree wide-angle viewing




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Canon Rebel XSi & lenses...




bry1105


I'm thinking about purchasing my first DSLR; the Canon Rebel XSi. From what I know from research and have read in reviews, it seems like a lot of camera for the money / a lot of bang for the buck. Also good for a beginner with DSLRs. Say I get one. Lets talk lenses.... Would a Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-300mm fit onto the Rebel? (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=NavBar&A=getItemDetail&Q=&sku=347531&is=REG&si=rev#anchorToReadReviews) I'm thinking of getting this lens to cover all my lens needs (wide angle all the way to telephoto) with only one lens. Why? Because it would be convenient to have only one lens and also there would be less chance for dust to enter while changing lenses. Is this a smart idea? Or should I get the kit with the standard 18-55mm lens and buy a separate telephoto lens?


Answer
Yes, it seems that lens will fit on the XSi.

I'd be wary of that lens due to its huge zoom range. That lens has a zoom of about 10x (300/28 = 10). *Generally* lenses with over 5x zoom range make compromises in image quality in order to accommodate the extra zoom. That can be seen in this lens with the f/6.3 at the long end - that's slow. It may be convenient to have that range but it comes at a cost. Also, as previously mentioned, with the 1.6x crop factor the 28mm becomes 44.8mm which isn't really covering the wide angle anyways.

If I were you I'd go with the kit and then get a separate telephoto. The newest version of the 18-55mm (the IS) is supposed to be a pretty decent lens for the money. One think I'd look out for when choosing your telephoto is the 75-300mm that they sell at all the big electronics stores. It's a pretty crappy lens, especially for what they charge for it. If you can find it used for $100 I'd go for it. Otherwise I'd get the 100-300mm or the 70-300mm.

Beginner Photographer: Should i buy this lens with the canon rebel t2i?




Jamie Isa-


I'm a beginner photographer, i like taking pictures of nature, scenery, and people. I am going to buy the canon rebel t2i. The camera comes in three different packages ;

camera with 18-55 mm IS lens- $649
camera with 18-55 lens and 75-300 USM-$829
camera with 18-55 lens and 55-250IS- $899

i was just wondering which package i should get because i don't want to pay for an extra lens which i might not even need, or buy a camera with only one lens and then have to buy another lens later on which will be more expensive to buy on it's own. please let me know which choices would be better for me, thanks! (:
*do you think i will need the additional lens if i am a beginner ?



Answer
I have Canon XSi with 18-55 and 55-250. The 55-250 is a great lens. that perfectly complements the 18-55.

Avoid the 75-300 - nowhere near as good as the 55-250.

The extra $250 for the 55-250 seems a little expensive to me. That lens is available on Amazon for $215.

I would get the T2i with single lens from Amazon for $630
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=canon+55-250&x=0&y=0#/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_4_6?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=canon+t2i&sprefix=canon+&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Acanon+t2i

Then if you feel you need the extra zoom go for the 55-250 afterwards
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-55-250mm-4-0-5-6-Telephoto-Digital/dp/B0011NVMO8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1325797568&sr=8-1




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Camera lens question?




RAWRRAWRRA


so i have a Nikon L120 and i was looking to buy a lens for it. I was just wondering if you can just put any Nikon lens on it, or do i have to get a lens specified for my camera? I am looking for a macro lens what would be the average price for a decent one? oh and one last thing, is there an "everyday" lens that i could put on it just for taking random pictures?

thanks for your time!



Answer
What u have is a bridge camera. U can't change lenses on it.

If u see ne1 saying they r selling a lens 4 ur camera it's not a lens. It's just a filter that screws onto the end of the camera's lens. They r all poor quality & not worth what u'd spend on them.

How do I get good pictures out of my Holga 135bc 35mm camera?




Lindsay Ga


I'm not very good with cameras, but I have a Holga 135bc 35mm camera because I loved the pictures its supposed to take. when i went to get them developed, only 4 of them came out and they were nothing like other pictures ive seen. they came out very bad. not sure what im doing wrong. help please??


Answer
While the Holga lens will add some interesting characteristics to your images, a certain essential ingredient must be added to each photo to make them work... your brain! When learning how to use your camera (any camera- digital, or lo-fi film camera), you must put a little thought into what you are doing. Once you get the hang of it, you won't need to think about it much, as the thought process becomes automatic.

One of the things you must be aware of is your film camera's limitations. You say only a few photos came out. One mistake that I see often, is that people willl often shoot in low light condtions. While digital cameras will often get an image under these conditions, film is usually not sensitive enough to shoot under the same condtions. Holga cameras like light, and lots of it. For now, shoot in good sunlight, or if shooting indoors, night or other low light conditions, use a flash unit.

What film are you using? Your choice of film will often make a difference. One thing to look for is a film with an ISO rating of 400. The ISO rating is a measure of how sensitive the film is to light. Slower films with a lower ISO rating (ISO160 or 200) are easier to find in your local drugstores, but they require more light to make a proper exposure. If you want good color saturation, a film like Kodak's Portra or Fujifilms 400HD are good choices. I have a blog post about film here:
http://bit.ly/kWhichFilm

Next thing to think about, is how far away are you from your subject? If you are mostly shooting things that are far away from the camera (landscapes, or buildings that are far away), you aren't giving the lens much to work with. What I mean by that, is that the unique characteristics of the Holga lens give a sharp-blurry feel, but the subject must be fairly close to your camera to make the differences more easily apparent. If you haven't tried it, get closer to your subject, and check your focus setting as you move in.

Another thing to consider, is what time of day you are shooting. If you are shooting around noon, when the sun is high, the light from the sun becomes flat, and the shadows are short and harsh. If you try shooting in the late afternoon or early moring, the shadows become longer and the low raking sunlight will give an interesting texture to the subjects.

This is a lot to think about, but just a little awareness of the conditions you are shooting under, and few other things will give your photos that little extra bit of something that you are probably missing from your photos.

I have a video on how to make sure the camera settings are right for each photo. I use that acronym SAFE to remiind me.
S - Shutter setting, for everyday outdoor shooting, the camera shutter setting should be on N.
A- Aperture, choose the appropriate aperture setting for the light condtions. Sunny or Cloudy.
F- Focus, set the lens to the appropriate distance from your subject.
E- Expose! Trip the shutter and take the photo, advance the film.

Repeat as necessary.

The video I made for this is done with a Holga 120, but the basics still apply:
http://bit.ly/kShootHolga

For more info on lo-fi photography, visit my website:
http://dianacamera.com

For more how to videos for Holga and other lo-fi cameras, check out my youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/kaituba




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Cannon XS vs Sony a390 DSLR?




Sarah


I'm looking to buy my first dslr and i'm weighing these two options. The Cannon XS was released 2008 and its 10.2 megapixel but the Sony a390 was released 2010 and is 14.2. Here's my delema: i can get the Cannon XS for $400 including the original lens PLUS cannon 55-250mm lens. Or i could get the sony a390 for around $439 with the original 18-55mm lens.

So what it comes down to is what is worth my money? I just want a nice camera to take high quality photos



Answer
Buy the XS, the extra lens makes it worth it over the Sony and that's coming from a Sony shooter!

Don't worry about the mpix, the image quality of both cameras is the same in reality.

Do professional cameras come with a lens?




Elissa


Excuse my ignorance, i'm planning on buying a digital slr camera - and obviously to know everything about a camera you should use it & i've never used/bought this type of camera.

i need to know if the price of the camera includes the lens in it.

If the lens inclusion depends on the camera, i'm thinking on these opportunities:
NikOn D3000
Canon Rebel T3 (1100d)
Nikon D3100
Sony A390
Olympus E-620



Answer
When you buy a DSLR, you can either buy the body only (just the camera with no lenses) or as a "kit" (camera body and 1 or 2 basic lenses). Most ads will specify if a lens is included, but you should read the specifications to verify it. Since this appears to be your first DSLR, I would suggest getting a camera kit and taking a basic photography course at your local community college (some camera shops also offer decent courses).

The best thing to do is visit your local camera shop and see which ones have everything you are wanting and feels good in your hands. Both Nikon and Canon make nice cameras. I prefer my Canon for its ergonomics and the menu layout, a fellow photog prefers Nikon for the same reason.

Don't forget to budget in things like extra battery, memory cards, and a nice padded gear case to start off with and then start saving for additional lenses.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Will canon slr lenses fit a nikon slr camera?




Hannah's M


Will canon slr lenses fit on a nikon slr camera?


Answer
For full function, it is best to use Nikon lenses with Nikon cameras and Canon with Canon.

Here is why:

Each lens within a camera system, has proprietary circuits in them that "talk" to the camera and give it data like focal length and aperture being used and is needed to produce the top performance of the lens/camera combination and becomes super important when you add a dedicated electronic flash to the mix.

My guess is your question is the result of wanting to change systems because of a perceived quality that a Nikon body has over your existing Canon body. As you can see, changing camera systems can become very expensive. This is why many of us here, suggest that you spend at least six months researching the various camera systems before choosing the one you will be married to over the next couple of decades.

If you are committed to switch from Canon to Nikon systems, you will have to sit down and analyze the actual cost of 1) replacing your lenses with Nikkor lenses for your new camera and 2) get a good idea of how much you can get for your Canon system when you sell it. It may well be that you will take to large a loss and will have to be content with using Canon products unless a rich uncle dies and leaves you his fortune or you will one of the lotteries.

Nikon FM10 Film Camera Lenses?




sydney kay


I was wondering what high aperture lenses are compatible with the Nikon FM10 film camera?
Also do any Minolta lenses fit in this camera?



Answer
Any of the Nikkor lenses that have large apertures, f/2.8 and faster and are Nikkor AF-D, AI-P, AF-I, AI-S and AF-S lenses.

Here is the list.

http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Products/Camera-Lenses/All-Lenses/index.page




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Which Canon EF/EF-S lens should I get for portrait and landscape shots?




Ray H


Hi All,

Canon 400D digital Rebel is my newest d-SLR. If I may ask the community, which type of lenses should go on 400D get to capture the best portrait images for indoor family photos and outdoor landscape shots?

Lens cost is targeted around $1000 USD. I have gone through technical specs and site reviews, but mixed answers are given from site reviews to user comments.

What would you recommend with the following environments to select 2 types of lens?
1. Excellent indoor portraits in,
> Low lighting environment,
> Family party gathering,
> Food presentations.
2. Good outdoor landscape pictures in,
> Summer time conditions in California,
> Minor distortions with face in landscape pictures,
> None moving subject.

I am choosing the two lenses for the following reasons:

#1
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM â yields good shots for indoor with low lighting, $290.

#2
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM â superb quality and results in all ranges, $550

Would you choose these two lenses? Why?



Answer
First of all be advised that the XTi has a 1.6x crop factor that make the 50mm looks like a 80mm lens in your camera and this goes to every lenses.

The 50mm f1.4 is an excellent lens that can handle low light condition very well, but it would be difficult for you to work on landscape and group portraits with this lens because of the fixed focal length. Sometimes you can work things out by walking towards/further from the object you want to shoot, but it may not always be possible.

The 70-200 f4 is excellent for portrait and wildlife photography, but again, for group photo it will be a little bit difficult to work with because it's a tele lens. If you have to shoot a large number of people in a relatively small space, you won't be able to shoot everyone in one frame because it's not wide enough.

Both lenses should be good for food photography though - and I'm sure you can use it in any condition.

So... what are the alternatives?

Wide angle lenses are perfect for group and landscape photography. And in this case, the kit lens (the 18-55mm f3.5-5.6) are in the perfect range. But of course you've heard about the quality of the lens, and if you wanted something better there are the EF-S 17-85 f4-5.6 IS which goes for about ~$500 (depending on merchant), which has perfect range and image stabilization to help you in low light condition. It's a good lens but if you wanted something better there's the EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS - which I also use personally. It's razor sharp, it's fast and I can safely vouch for this piece of thing for its quality. The f2.8 ensure you to capture good picture in low light condition (although I would still recommend using flash, preferrably external flash) and the IS will help you even more. The only catch for this lens is the price - it goes for around ~$900. But since you're in the budget, I think this could be the perfect lens for you.

Also there's the EF 17-40 f4L lens - which is somewhat in a similar range and somewhat cheaper than the EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS, but I would only recommend this lens if you have plan to upgrade your camera to a full frame sensor.

Last but not least... I'm only confident to shoot in low light condition with flash, unless if I'm using a fast prime (fixed focal length/non-zoom) lens, and the built in flash is less than what most people expect so I would strongly recommend get an external flash (the 430EX should suffice, although I would prefer a 580EX II myself). If you decided to get the 17-55 f2.8, you probably will have to wait and save up until you have a budget to buy external flash. But the combination of the 17-55 and an external flash would give you an edge in low light photography.

Anyway, I hope this helps.

explain mm camera lens?




tenny


i do not understand the mm specs


Answer
The "mm" spec tells you the focal length of the lens.

By itself, this doesn't mean much. But by comparing the mm spec, you get an idea what a camera with a particular lens would be good at.

Cameras with lenses below 40 mm are for "wide angle" pictures. The lower the mm number the wider the view through that lens. So a camera with a wide angle lens would be better for group portraits, or wide views of large objects (Grand Canyon), or whenever you need a wide view. The objects in these pics will look smaller, farther away than usual.

Cameras with lenses above 100 mm are for "telephoto" pictures. The higher the mm number the stronger the magnification or telescope effect. Cameras with these lenses are better for taking pictures of things farther away from you (a mountain) or for getting closeup of something you cannot get close to (a wild bird). The objects in these pics will look closer, bigger than normal.

Most digicams have "zoom" lenses where you see two numbers given for focal length, for example "35-105mm". This says the lens can change from 35mm (wide angle) all the way up to 105mm (telephoto). Since 35x3=105, this is called a "3x" zoom lens.

Using a camera with a 3x zoom lens allows you to choose between wide angle, and telephoto, and anything in between, for your pictures.

Have Fun!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Which Canon should I get?




HulaGirl


Hi,

I'm really serious about photography (it's not just a hobby).
Currently, I have a Rebel XSi right now.
One friend recommend a classic 5D and another one recommend the 60D.
I mainly want to do natural lighting portraits and some weddings.

1. What's better and why:
7D
5D Mark II
5D Classic?
60D

2. Should I buy the body/lens or just the body?

3. I kind of want to have a second camera just for shooting video.
What's better? Should I buy the lens too?:
T3i
T2i

Thank you!



Answer
If you are serous about photography, it's best to stick with what you have, and get another lens (don't get a cheap one). Buying a more expensive camera will not improve your photos (from what you have, XSi). There is a user here who only has Canon XT and after a couple of years of photography lessons (at her school), her photos improved ten folds. So what you have now is a fine camera but you need to learn how to use it.

Also, if I may, I have to assume that you are not aware that if you move to a full frame camera (5d or 5d Mark II), your lens now will not work with it (EF-S). So if you only buy a camera body, whatever you have now are useless. So another lens that I talked about earlier would have to be EF (for full frame).

You also didn't talk about your budget. 5d Mark II plus an L lens could easily run into 4 or so thousand or more. What are you preparing to pay?

Don't use these dSLR for video. I have 5d Mark II and it is not very usable for video without other hardware (to hold it up) and that costs a lot of money.

whats better to film with canon 7D or canon xh a1?




Dominik B


i dont know which 1 to choose here are my opions
7D
PRO:Small , cheaper , interchangeable len's
CON:Can only record for like 14 mins , it doesnt look professional when recording a video (minor con)
CANON xh a1
PRO:record for a longer time , more recording options , XLR
CON: Big , needs a 35mm adapter for good DoF , more expensive

so which should i choose im mainly going to be filming skit's and music videos and maybe later on weddings



Answer
canon 7D is better




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Will a Canon EF 28-90 mm lens work on an XSi?




lulu


I own a Canon EOS Rebel K2 film camera that came with a kit lens Canon EF 28-90 mm. I am thinking of going digital and am going to buy a EOS Rebel XSi. My question is if my old lens would work on the new camera so I could just buy the body and switch it out. I eventually, in the very far future, want to buy nicer lens, but can't really afford it right now. Do they work very differently? I am not very knowledgeable on this subject. As a side note does anyone know how good the EF-S 18-55IS lens is? Should I buy the XSi as a kit or buy a separate/better lens?


Answer
The EF 28-90 will work just fine on an XSi. In fact the XSi can use all EF and EFs lenses. The 28-90 will perform differently on the XSi though. The Canon Rebels and the 40D and 50D all use an APS-C sized sensor which is smaller than 35mm film. This means that the image appears more magnified than on your film camera. You will often here this referred to as the crop factor. The crop factor is 1.6. So what you need to do is multiply the focal length of your lens by 1.6 to get the equivalent focal length on your film camera. Your 28-90mm lens will perform as a 44.8-144mm lens would on your film camera. This is good on the telephoto end but bad on the wide angle end. This is why the kit lens for the digital cameras is 18-55mm instead of 28-90mm. If you will miss the wide angle I would suggest getting the 18-55mm lens kit.

One other thing. The EFs lenses will not work on your film camera or a full frame digital like the 5D MKII. Just keep that in mind when you are lens shopping in the future.

I'm looking for a replacement lens for my Canon Rebel XSi...?




wenggay


because I broke the 18-55mm lens that came with the kit. I didn't want to get the exact lens for replacement but i don't know which one to get. I'm now looking at Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Telephoto Zoom Lens but i don't know if it could be a direct replacement... could i actually have it directly attached to just the body of the camera or does it require a working standard zoom lens that i had? Please help me. Thank you in advance


Answer
You can use ALL...Canon EF and EF-S lenses (plus third party lenses with Canon mount) on your Rebel XSi.

I agree with Hondo. The EF 75-300mm lens is a crap lens. But what would you expect from a telephoto lens that costs a mere US$138 (from Amazon)? Lens choice is very important...and often you DO get what you pay for. Choose wisely (yes, it may cost a bit) and it will become an investment that will last for years...because spending money on a crap lens is a complete waste of money if it's not going to deliver good results.

So, you'll need to spend more than a measly $140 on a telephoto lens if you want sharp image quality. I recommend you buy a new lens with a similar focal range than your kit lens, because it makes a good general purpose lens, whereas a lens starting at 75mm, is not so 'general purpose'.

I recommend the new Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. This lens has an ultrasonic motor and is a big step up in image and build quality than the standard kit lens. That's why it costs around US$699.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-15-85mm-f-3.5-5.6-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/465-canon_1585_3556is

If you prefer a telephoto lens, I recommend the excellent Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM (US $636)
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-4.0-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspx
However, if it's way too much for your budget...I recommend the Canon EF-S 55-250mm (US$200-250).
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/411-canon_55250_456is_50d

If you need much better low light shooting capability, look at getting a prime lens (single focal length) like the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (US $100-120) or the f/1.4 version with USM (US$345). These lenses are great for shooting handheld in low light and also portraits.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-50mm-f-1.8-II-Lens-Review.aspx
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-50mm-f-1.4-USM-Lens-Review.aspx




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What are the best settings to use on my camera for outdoor portraits?




Jess


I have a Canon EOS 1000D and I read through the manual and everything, but there are so many settings and things to remember. I am interested in photography so I will eventually learn how to use all the settings, but I'd like to know which settings are best for outdoor portraits on a sunny day. Should I use P, Tv, Av, M, etc. The ISO, metering mode, etc. Any tips are also welcome :)
Thanks



Answer
Camera manuals tell the user how to control the shutter speed, lens aperture, ISO, white balance and generally how to use the camera

What you are asking is how to be a photographer.

That is something that will take some study on your part especially when it comes to shooting specific subjects.

In the case of shooting portraits, indoors or out, will require you to learn about portrait lighting, portrait composition and subject direction.

There are NO portrait settings on a fully adjustable camera like your fine 1000D. You no longer have a P&S camera that does everything for you. Now you are going to have to learn how to use your camera to get the shots you want.

Here is one link you may find helpful, but in the end, the fastest way to learn what you are asking is to take a class in photography.

Link on lighting:

http://strobist.blogspot.com/

Here is a checklist:

* Shoot in the shade to prevent harsh shadows
* Set the white balance for shade
* Use a medium telephoto lens
* Shoot with the lens aperture either wide open or one stop down
* Direct the subject into poses that are faltering for their face (you will want to visit a number of sites which have photos of people posing for portraits

Outdoor portrait camera settings?




E W


I'm having an early evening outdoor photo shoot at around 6 pm, assuming it's sunny and probably one hour before sunsets. I want to know the best combination settings;

1. Which shooting mode (A, S, or Manual)
2. Which ISO
3. Which Exposure Compensation.
4. Which White Balance

I have a Nikon D90, 24-70mm F2.8 lens and SB800 speed light (is speed light needed?)

Your professional advice is greatly appreciated!
Best,



Answer
1. Whichever you need
2. Whichever you need
3. Use the light meter to determine the correct exposure
4. Shoot RAW, then it doesn't matter, because you can adjust in post processing
5. If there is not enough light, or if the background is too bright you may need flash

There is no way for us to tell you the settings to use in advance, since we have no way of knowing what the lighting conditions will be at the time of shooting. You need to learn how to make these decisions yourself.

Just make sure you don't shoot in harsh sunlight, find a shaded area. Don't use anything wider than 50mm for portraits. You may need a tripod.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Nikon/camera experts? Lens help?




Lauren


I'm a photographer for the yearbook and I'm assigned a lot of sports to take pictures of. I have a Nikon D5000 and the lens it came with: a Nikon DX AF-S NIKKOR 18-55 mm 1:3.5-5.6G VR. One of the sports I'm assigned to is football. I need a lens with more zoom capability. What do you recommend? If you could include a price range with your suggestion, I'd really appreciate it.


Answer
i would recommend the nikon 70-300mm lens, its $500, it was built for nikon f mount, so it will fit perfectly in your D5000, look it on www.futureshop.ca

Best valued Nikon lens for sports photography?




austin ste


Im currently in high school and Im going to begin doing sports photography with a Nikon D7000. Im going to be shooting both indoor sports and outdoor sports. Id like to get something with a large zoom capacity, but could also go wide angle. I dont care if its Tamron or Sigma or some other brand as long as its a good lens.My budget is under $900. Thanks!


Answer
When shooting indoor or night sports you need a lens with a f/2.8 aperture and even then you will be shooting at 3200 ISO.

The Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2.8 costs almost $2,000 and that lens is the one used for shooting along the baseline of basketball or sidelines of other court games.

I use a Nikkor 300 mm f/2.8 when shooting cross court at basketball games and football as well as baseball.

When shooting outdoors, then you can use lenses that have smaller maximum lens apertures, so they will fall within your budget.

Here are two shots using the Nikkor 300 mm f/2.8

http://s862.photobucket.com/albums/ab182/fotomanaz/Answers%20album/?action=view&current=i_AIA3008copy.jpg

http://s862.photobucket.com/albums/ab182/fotomanaz/Answers%20album/?action=view&current=iBonnerInAirc.jpg

As you can see, when shooting under low light conditions, you do need a fast lens. If shooting shots during day time games, the AF-S 70-300 mm VR lens is fine. The f/5.6 lens aperture at 300 mm is not going to be a hindrance when used in bright sun or even overcast days

Here is a link to all the Nikkor lenses that are available.

http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Camera-Lenses/All-Lenses/index.page

If you had a Nikon D3, you could shoot at ISO 6400 using a nice 200-400 mm f/4 lens, but again, those tools are too far out of your budget.

As you are going to learn, the cost of the tools used by sports photographers are quite high.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Can Minolta srt 101 lens fit Nikon D60?




juliedowdy


I have a old Minolta srt 101 and a lot of lenses. I want to upgrade to a digital camera but do not want to spend tons of money and then my lens not fit. Can anyone help me... what new digital camera will fit my Minolta lenses???


Answer
No they will not mount to any current DSLR.

The Minolta "SR" bayonet lens mount used by the lenses for your SRT-101 was replaced by Minolta in 1985 when they introduced the Maxxum 7000 auto focus camera with the A-mount. The current Sony DSLR cameras still use the A-mount so any Minolta Maxxum lens made since 1985 can be used.

There is an adapter to use your classic Minolta lenses on the current Sony DSLR line and there are adapters made to allow them to be used on Canon and Olympus DSLR cameras. To the best of my knowledge there is currently no adapter made to use Minolta "SR" mount lenses on a Nikon.

Since using your older Minolta lenses on the DSLR's I listed will require manual focus and stop-down metering, you might want to consider selling them. Then you can use the money towards your new camera.

***** EDIT *****
Please email me a list of the Minolta lenses you have. I'm in the market for a Minolta MC ROKKOR-X 17mm f4 lens.

Will any SLR digital cameras fit my Minolta lenses.?




Trudie G


I have a Minolta 35mm camera with a lot of extras including several expensive lenses.
It's time to upgrade to a digital. Is there a digital camera that I can use my lenses on? I am going to retire soon and will finally be abe to enjoy my passion. I am not willing to sacrifice getting a quality camera just so that I can use my current lenses. I will just have to start over. This will proably be my last camera so I want to get it right.
Thanks in advance for any information.



Answer
If your Minolta is from the SRT line (SRT-100, 101, 102, 200, 201, 202) or the X series (XG-7, 9, XK, X-700, XE-7, X-570, X-370) then your lenses are not compatible with any current DSLR without an adapter. Those older lenses used the MC/MD lens mount.

If your camera is from the Maxxum series introduced in 1985 then your lenses will mount on all current Sony DSLR cameras - A100, 200, 300, 350, 700, 900. Minolta changed their lens mount from the MC/Md to the A-mount with the Maxxum. Since Sony bought the DSLR technology from Konica-Minolta they wisely kept the A-mount.

There are adapters available to use the olde MC/MD mount lenses on the Sony, Olympus and Canon DSLR cameras.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Can you use DSLR lenses on compact system cameras?




Ye2


I know nothing about DSLR cameras vs compact system cameras! I really want to upgrade from my point and shoot Sony to the Olympus Pen E-PL1 Camera. Now I'm aware that the lens on this camera is not good for zoom shots. Could I use a Nikon lens taken from a friend's DSLR camera?


Answer
Sorry short and very simple answer NO because the Lenses on a Point and Shoot Cameras can not be removed.

What are the best camera lenses (zoom or static) for a Canon DSLR mark ii?




Bob


the cheaper the better! :)
I'm talking about the Canon 5D mark ii, that is just the most popular/common "mark ii" people seem to use... So I assumed people would know which one I was talking about here... hope that clears up any confusion
And one more thing: Can anyone edit their answers and post a YouTube example of the Canon 5d mark ii or mark iii with the lens or lenses they suggested? That would be the most helpful thing so you could see real examples of what footage looks like (instead of ideas in your head from what somebody says), although if you don't post a video with examples I guess we could all go scour YouTube ourselves...
Thanks everyone for all the answers, much appreciated.

(btw - I'm more interested in using the DSLR for shooting HD video than shooting photographs)



Answer
It all depends on what type of photography you do. Since we have no way of knowing whether you shoot portraits or sports or landscapes or weddings there is no way for us to make an intelligent suggestion.

Note that "... best camera lenses ..." and "... cheaper ..." are never used in the same sentence.

Here is a listing of all currently available Canon lenses:
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup

NOTE: Ignore all lenses that are EF-S because they can't be used on a 5D MK II.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Which Canon DSLR Lens to buy?




kaching113


I am going to purchase the Canon EOS 60D, and I'm not sure whether I should purchase the EF-S 18-55mm lens or the 50mm/1.8 lens. Primarily, I'm going to use the 60D for filmmaking and of course photography as well, I'm trying to decide on these two lenses as they are within my budget. Which lens has more range/which is more appropriate for filmmaking?

Advice from photographers and filmmakers are gladly appreciated.



Answer
First, lose the word "film" from your vocabulary. Digital cameras shoot video NOT film. You want to be a videographer.

Although the EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 zoom will offer you more versatility its not a good lens for use indoors. Its a slow, variable aperture zoom that does fine outdoors on a sunny day but indoors you'll have to use a very high ISO and a high ISO means increased digital noise - not good for your videos.
You'll need a lot of light to successfully take indoor videos with a lower ISO.

On the flip side, the EF 50mm f1.8 is more suitable for indoor use IF you're in a large space. The problem indoors is the narrow angle of view of the 50mm lens on your Canon 60D. The 50mm lens is great for portraits with your camera though.

Although more expensive a better alternative would be the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 zoom. Its a much better lens than the 18-55mm and more suitable for indoor videos. Since its a constant f2.8 from 17mm to 55mm the shutter speed stays the same - unlike the 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 which will cause a decrease in shutter speed as you zoom from 18mm to 55mm.

At B&H - http://www.bhphotovideo.com - you can buy the Canon 60D body for $799.99 after a $200.00 'Instant Savings' from B&H that ends 02/02/2013.

At B&H the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 zoom is $1.059.00 after a $120.00 'Instant Savings' from B&H that also ends 02/02/2013.

This site will show you the narrow angle of view of a 50mm lens on your 60D.
http://www.sweeting.org/mark/lenses/canon.php

What kind of camera should I buy?




Julia S


I wouldn't like to spend over $800
I need a camera that's good quality..better than your average digital camera and that can both take photos and record video (that's not as important but it would be nice)
I would like to be able to use it for motion photos, landscape, night life etc.
Basically the most important thing is picture quality :)
Any ideas. Thanks!



Answer
Having used several DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, I like Pentax K-01 as a great camera- one of the best image quality out then in below $1000 cameras. Pentax used to sell for around $900 but their gamble with the style backfired so they are clearing them out. They currently sell for around $400 with a nice 40mm 2.8 lens.

Read full details here:
http://photography-with-any-camera.blogspot.com/2013/06/which-is-great-dslr-buy-these-days.html




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Monday, June 9, 2014

Telephoto lens for indoor sporting events...?




cerbberi


Can you recomend a good lens for capturing high-speed action in a gym? I have a film Canon Elan. I'd like pictures of high enough quality to hang on my wall, but I don't want to break the bank. It seems that lenses are either several thousands of dollars, or cheap junk. I'm not sure what exactly I'm looking for so any suggestion is welcome. I'm thinking, it would be ~f2.8 and >50mm. I don't know what a good length would be. The action will probably be about 30 - 50 feet from me, and I want the competitors to fill the frame. It needs to have an aperature large enough to compensate for gymnasium lighting.

Is there a good lens under $400 (better under $350) that will fit my Elan and produce great sports pictures?

Do I just need to be a better photographer???



Answer
The Elan 7E is a decent Canon EOS film SLR capable of handling any of the Canon EF lenses, but not the EF-s lenses made for "crop" dSLR cameras. For indoor sports photography, you're going to need fast film (ISO1600 at least) and fast lenses to get the required shutter speeds.

(A quick aside about shutter speeds: For capturing "action" shots where the subject will fill a reasonable amount of frame, you're going to need at least 1/500th of a second or faster shutter speed. If you have to do 1/400th, you'll see some motion blur, but that might be acceptable to you. Even at 1/500th, you'll relatively freeze the players, but any ball may show motion blur.)

For indoor sports (I'm assuming basketball, volleyball, maybe wrestling), you're going to want a fast focus and wide open (f/2.8 or better, with f/2 preferred) aperture. This means mostly prime lenses, except for expensive zooms.

A bunch of choices, in increasing focal length:

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (AKA "thrifty fifty") is a lightweight, inexpensive ($80!) lens that can really help out if you have a low budget. I own this lens, and it's nice to carry in a jacket pocket "just in case." However, it has a standard autofocus motor, so it's not all that fast of focus, but good enough for slow-paced action like free-throws or a volleyball serve. It's a bit short, but doable in a pinch. It's an all-plastic body and feels flimsy, so don't give it too hard of a time. Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM (AKA "nifty fifty") is a great lens with fast ultrasonic motor (USM) focusing and an all-metal body. Heavier than the f/1.8 above, it still suffers from a short focal length. You can get this for around $300 usually. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that you'd think would be great for indoor sports... except that it's not all that fast of a focus and not made for sports. For over $1000, I'm including it just for completion. Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM is a fantastic lens with fast USM focusing, a decent focal length (perfect for portraits, btw), with a nice, fast aperture. I know several professional photographers that shoot basketball (HS, college, and some NBA) with this lens on their main camera (HS, college) or backup (NBA). I own this lens, and it's on my camera 70% of the time for indoor soccer. It is, however, a bit too short for my soccer fields, and a longer lens is planned. You can get this for around $350 usually. Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM is another pro-series "L" that sounds great, but WAAAAY too slow to focus. At over $1200, you'd think it'd be good for sports, but alas, it's not. Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM is a fantastic lens, but is often either too short or too long. At $460, it's close to your budget, and may work out.
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that is reputed to be one of the best lenses ever made by Canon. For $900, it doesn't meet your budgetary requirements, but I would be amiss not mentioning this. If you want one of the best indoor sports lenses, this is on the short list. Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM is another pro-series "L" but more reasonable and a staple of indoor sports shooters. New, this lens is around $650, but attainable used for around $500. At f/2.8, it's a bit slower than the previous lenses, but doable. If you really like the 200mm focal length and really really REALLY want a faster lens, you can always attempt to find the... Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM lens, which has been out of production for years, and used lenses go for over $2500 last I checked. The price is simply supply and demand. There is a heavy demand (professional NBA photographers, gymnastics photographers, etc.) and not much supply. This is a dream lens for me, but I can't rationalize the purchase at this time. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM is a zoom lens that is reported to be one of the optically best zoom lenses in the history of Canon. At $1100, it's a bit out of range, but well worth looking at. If you have $600 more available, look at the IS version with Image Stabilization. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO HSM is Sigma's entry similar to the Canon zoom above. At $900, it's $200 cheaper and still a very nice lens. The images tend to run a bit cool, though, so you may need your lab to provide some slight color correction.
I recommend using your current zoom to figure out at what focal length you're more likely to need by just framing the shot and taking a note as to the focal length. I'm sure you'll see that you're often close to one of the prime lenses listed above.

I hope that's a good list for beginning. If you want to talk lenses more, drop me a private message.

As for buying lenses, take a look here (Amazon) which really is a portal for www.adorama.com, which is a very reputable camera store. Also, check out www.bhphotovideo.com which is another top-notch store with often the lowest prices around.

Best walk around lens for under $400? (for Canon)?




Eric


I want to upgrade from a kit 18-55mm IS lens. This is going on a cropped 1.6 Canon. What's the best option for that price? IS isn't necessary. Can be any brand (Tamron/Sigma/etc...).
Looking to buy new not used.
I'm considering the Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM, any other recommendations? I want it to be as sharp as possible. Thanks!
$500 would be the max if something worthy falls under the $500 price range but I'm looking for best bang/buck at the end of the day.



Answer
I think you should go with Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

28-105mm standard zoom lens with f/3.5-4.5 maximum aperture for Canon SLR cameras
Ring-type ultra-sonic monitor (USM) provides silent, high-speed autofocusing
1.6-foot close focusing distance; rotating zoom system; 58mm filter size
Ideal for Canon EOS A2/Aw3 or ELAN 7 series cameras with built-in flashes
Measures 2.8 inches in diameter and 3 inches long; weighs 13.2 ounces




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Nikon D700 dslr.. which is a better deal?




Annika


So I'm camera shopping and came across these two deals:

Option 1:http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Nikon-D7000-SLR-5-Lens-Kit-18-55mm-70-300mm-50mm-8GB-Much-More-/150835837712?pt=Digital_Cameras&hash=item231e843b10#ht_19179wt_1396

Option 2: http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Nikon-D7000-Body-6-Lens-28-80-75-300-500mm-16GB-Loaded-Accessories-Kit-/170859759997?pt=Digital_Cameras&hash=item27c809097d#ht_19669wt_1396

Currently I am leaning more towards option one because I've read that Nikon lenses are much better built than Tamron. However, I like Option 2's actual lens because they cover each others mm sizes, and do not leave out some mm like in Option 1, if that makes sense.

For example, Option Two has 28-80mm, and 75-300mm lens.
Option One has 18-55mm lens and 75-300mm. This leaves out 56-74mm of lens.
I am an amateur photographer and not sure if it makes a difference.

Input would be helpful, thanks!



Answer
Those bundle deals are filled with over-priced JUNK!

Just get a D7000 w/ an 18-105 or (better yet) buy a D3200 w/ an 18-55.

What camera to get my Girlfriend? Please help?




Magic


My girlfriend is a beginner this will be her first camera and i know for a fact she wants a DSLR not a digital compact camera. She really likes Nikon. A few months ago she we were looking at the cameras in bestbuy and she seemed to like the Nikon D3200 and the Nikon D5100....

I have no knowledge of cameras.. I have three questions...

1.Which one of these would be best to get her the Nikon D3200 or the Nikon D5100??

2. do all Nikon lens fit those or how do i know what lens to get?

3. Should i buy it from a store like best buy or see if i could find it on craigslist or ebay somthing like that??



Answer
I think The Nikon D3200 would be the best. The price is Good And it will be an easy camera to Learn with.
The Nikon D3200 Is a DX format camera. so it will take DX format lenses. Simple enough. Film lenses will also fit the D3200. If you are not up to paying for digital lenses. But the only downside to film lenses is that they are manual not auto.

I would buy brand new from either bestbuy or another store that sells cameras.
You should get a bundle with the camera. camera, lens, and some accessories. great deals.. Just look on best buy.com

Good luck.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Is there any android apps that have a camera app to where you can turn the lens around like an iphone camera?




BeatlesFan


Hate taking pictures on Android phones you can't see how you come out.


Answer
My Android phone has a secondary camera that lets me see pictures that are taken (of my or someone else's face, based on assumption). Try looking in the settings of your camera before you take a picture.

what is a toy camera?




Kevin7





Answer
Toy cameras are simple, inexpensive film box cameras made almost entirely out of plastic, often including the lens. The term is misleading, since they are not merely 'toys' but are in fact capable of taking photographs. Many were made to be given away as novelties or prizes. The Diana, an inexpensive 1960s 4x4cm novelty box camera from Hong Kong, is typically the camera most associated with the term 'toy camera'. Other cameras, such as the LOMO LC-A, Lubitel, and Holga, while originally intended as consumer, mass-market cameras, have also become identified with the term.

Many professional photographers have utilized toy cameras and the often strange optical effects of their inexpensive lenses to take award-winning photographs. Toy camera photography has been widely exhibited at many popular art shows, such as the annual Krappy Kamera show at the Soho Photo Gallery in the TriBeCa neighborhood of New York City. Various publications such as Popular Photography magazine have extolled the virtues of the Diana camera in its own right as an "art" producing image maker. Several books have also featured the work of toy cameras, such as The Friends of Photography's "The Diana Show", "Iowa" by Nancy Rexroth, and "Angels at the Arno" by Eric Lindbloom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toy_camera

September 6, 2010
The 3D hype is now entering the toy market as well. Takara Tomy announced [JP, PDF] the so-called 3D Shot Cam today, a simple photo camera with two lenses. This âtoy version of Fujifilmâs FinePix REAL 3D W3â is aimed at children aged 12 and older who have to use a special viewer to view images shot with the camera in 3D. For that, the pictures have to printed out first (showing two shots side by side).

The 3D Shot Cam features a 0.3MP sensor and an SD card slot (8GB max.). Itâs sized at 55Ã142Ã30mm, weighs 100g and comes with two 3D viewers.

The camera will hit Japanese stores sometime next spring with a $70 price tag. Takara Tomy expects to sell 50,000 units per year in Japan, without saying anything about international distribution plans.
http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/09/06/3d-shot-cam-takara-tomys-3d-toy-camera/

Toy Camera: About This Group

âA group for plastic camera fanatics! If you use a holga, diana, lomo or any other toycamera as well as homemade pinholes; upload your best shots here. This is the kingdom of ââcheapââ photography where plastic, leaks and vignetting are kings. Make sure this is not the right place for any digital or post processed photographies. And please⦠upload a maximum of 2 shots a day (so our homepage features few different artists at the time)
http://www.redbubble.com/toy-camera (photos on link)

ToyCamera Apps
Takayuki Fukatsu's series of the first ToyCamera apps. This simple application changes your iphone's camera to the fun toycamera. You do not need any difficult setting or photo editing knowledge. Actually this app has any setting panel. All you need is just take a photo with this app. ToyCamera automatically adds several random effects that is chosen in setting to your pictures.
- Both random & non-random mode.
- 427 to 1600px rect & square photos.
- 8 top quality effect, Vintage Green, Vintage Warm, Vintage Yellow, Low Saturation, High Saturation, Toning Sepia, Black & White, HiCon Black&White
- Uploader to the BigCanvas Photoshare
What's new
- Retina display support progress.

Now retina display support is almost done. Next we will start developing update for Twitter new authentification.
http://appshopper.com/photography/toy-camera




Powered by Yahoo! Answers