Saturday, May 31, 2014

Lens on a crop lens camera?




Ralf


If I put a 50 mm 1.8 lens on a Canon D7 or a Nikon D7000, is it still 50mm? Even if the lens is a DX Lens for Nikon? I'm confused. Please help, thanks.


Answer
On a DSLR...forget all about the "crop factor", it doesn't mean anything. The only thing that matters is how the lens frames the shot you want.

If a camera has a 1.3x "crop factor" with the 50mm, it will frame like a 65mm lens would on a full frame camera. If the camera has a 1.6x factor, then the lens behaves like an 80mm....BUT the lens is still a 50mm. It is just a matter of using what gives you what you want.

For example, when I shoot I don't say "Well, I need the framing view of a 150mm lens on a full frame camera, so 150/1.3 is 115.384615mm". Instead, I just grab the lens that I know will give me the framing I want...or at least close to it. I MIGHT grab a 100mm (which would be a 130mm equivalent and take a step or two forward) OR grab my 70-200 and zoom until it frames how I want, but I don't bother looking at the lens guide to see what it shows...I look through the viewfinder and say "that's the shot I want.

What is the best brand of DSLR camera?




wolleybell


thanks...


Answer
Top brands of DSLRs are, in alphabetical order -

Canon, Fujifilm, Leica (BIG $$$), Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic, Pentax, Sony and, to a more limited degree, Sigma (who makes lenses for many different camera brands, but has entered the advanced camera market). All of these companies make high quality cameras with significant market position that means they are likely to stay in the business for the foreseeable future. Any of these would be a good choice and would usually be selected according to your preferences for features and particular style.

Check out the Digital SLR Guide web site for an excellent guide to selecting a camera. Keep in mind that the most important part of your choice is not the camera but the lenses because that is what will take the actual photograph. Plus, if you pursue this interest for very long you are more likely to replace a camera body long before you replace a lens.

http://www.digital-slr-guide.com/index.html

My personal favorite is Olympus because they offer excellent value for the money. They are a smaller but very innovative company however they use a system called Four Thirds (4/3) with a smaller sensor than most of the other brands and that has been an area of great criticism and controversy. IMO, Olympus has done an excellent job of engineering and been able to provide many innovative features with their cameras. They helped to develop amd then adopted the Four Thirds system, an open standard that any other camera company can use to make compatible products. So far Leica and Panasonic also make camera for this standard and Sigma also makes lenses for 4/3 cameras..

Olympus lenses are generally been among the highest quality products available in any given price range, particularly the less expensive "standard" grade lenses. (They make more expensive "High Grade" and "Super High Grade" lenses, too). My suggestion would be to look at the E-520 because it has a number of improvements over the earlier E-500 and E-510 models, primarily to improve image quality in difficult lighting situations

To look at some pictures made with Olympus (mostly E500 and E1) cameras and lenses go to my Flickr page here -

http://www.flickr.com/photos/robs-photo-memory/sets/

To understand the Four Thirds camera system you can get more information at these sites

http://www.four-thirds.org/en/index.html
http://olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/cpg_digital_slr.asp

There are also many avid user groups that can help you get the most out of any of the popular camera brands.

HTH. E mail me if you have specific questions.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Nikon D7000 camera lenses?




Natalie


What is a really good ultra zoom lens for Nikon D7000 DSLR camera? Preferably under $400.00 (US dollars) lol! I'm needing one for going to a zoo, or somewhere when the focal object(s) would be very far away.

Thanks :)



Answer
Any Nikkor AF, AF-I or AF-S lens.

An "ultra-zoom" like a 18-200 mm or 18-300 mm lens will cost you closer to a grand.

Here is a list of all the lenses your camera can use.

http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Products/Camera-Lenses/All-Lenses/index.page

There is a 55-200 mm lens that will fit into your budget

Alternative Lens for Nikon D7000?




4getfull


So I am in the market for a new lens and the prices on Nikon's website scare me. I remembered that you can use other maker's lenses with a Nikon. What companies make cheaper (price not quality) that fit a Nikon D7000.


Answer
Have a look at Tamron and Sigma - both make Nikon mount lenses at significantly cheaper prices than Nikon/Nikkor do. Quality in my experience isn't a problem - I've Nikon D200 and D300 cameras and have both Tamron and Sigma lenses for them - the excellent Tamron 10 - 24mm wide angle lens was about half the cost of the equivalent Nikkor lens - and never had a moment's problem with them.

On Tamron's site, look for Di II lenses - built for your D7000. On Sigma's site have a look for DC lenses.

Both Tamron and Sigma lenses in other formats (Di III and DG for example) will work on your D7000 just fine but the focal length numbers for these formats need to be multiplied by 1.5. So, for example, a Sigma 70 - 300mm lens will be seen by your camera as a 105 - 450mm lens. Easier if you can to stick to the formats made for your camera :)




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Will a T80 canon lens fit my rebel xti?




uniquelyno


Is $75 a reasonable price? Are there any questions I should be asking about the lens? Thank you for your help and advice.


Answer
A Canon T80 lens would fit on your Canon Digital Rebel XTi through use of an adapter. The lens would be limited to macro work if you purchase a lens adapter without optical correction. There are adapters with corrective lenses, but, if you do choose to go down this route, prepare to be disappointed. Unless you're interested in moderate macro work or you have or will be getting unbelievably wonderful glass, it isn't worth it.
http://search.ebay.com/?fsop=32&satitle=fd+to+eos

Whether or not it is or is not a reasonable price depends on what lens it is. If it's an AC lens then you'll have a huge chunk of glass and plastic that will work only as a manual focus lens with no aperture control. If you're hard set on using FD-mount lenses, it'd be cheaper and probably better if you found an old MF-only lens with aperture control.

Which lens should I get for my canon rebel XTi?

Q. Ive been working at a photography studio for 2 years. I have since decided to branch out on my own, and after some disagreements i am having to get all new stuff. For my canon rebel xti 10.1 MP, im not sure which lens I should get? This will be for portraits and weddings and such. I just need to make sure I can zoom enough. I have been using a canon 30D, and love it. and I need this one to be up to par as well. help!


Answer
you might consider Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM Digital SLR Lens
This lens is just about perfect, and I don't throw that word around much. It yields blistering sharpness across the frame even at f/2.8 with punchy colors and great contrast. AF is pretty quick for a macro lens and silent as not to disturb the insects or other little critters you may be photographing. The build quality is sturdy with a nice texture on the barrel and a good feel to the focus ring. This lens functions as my portrait lens as well and does a good job kicking backgrounds out of focus at f/2.8 while rendering the subject with remarkable sharpness and clarity. In fact, it may be too sharp for some portrait work, you could count the pores on the subject's skin! You can't go wrong with this lens. I consider it a "must buy" for anyone with a Canon EF-S compatible camera.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0007WK8KS?ie=UTF8&tag=bestdeals-y-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0007WK8KS




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

what is a good macro lens for a Canon EOS 60D?




Kwame


i'm into taking pictures of plants and flowers as well as other things but i now need a lens that can show more detail. any suggestions?


Answer
Here are all the lenses Canon makes

http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup

Which you buy has more to do with the working distance you want between your subject and camera. The longer the lens, the further you can be from your subject

Best set of lenses for Canon 60D DSLR Camera?




DStar


I just bought DSLR Canon 60D camera, i love photography. This is my first camera, so i have no idea to chose set of lenses for this camera. Can any one tell me best lenses to complete the set of lenses for most of shoots. Tell me 1 best lens for closeup portraits, 1 lens for portraits from long distance, 1 lens for landscapes, 1 lens for closeup photography of objects which call macro lens


Answer
Here is the link you need

http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup

Closeup portrait - EF 50 mm f/1.4 or f/1.8

Wide angle - EF-S 10-22 mm

Macro - EF-S 60 f/2.8 mm macro

Long distance portraits - 70-200 mm f/2.8




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Are camera lens fittings all the same?




vivalazhon


i have an old minolta SLR camera with a few different lenses... i want to get a new digital SLR.... are the lens fittings standard, or would i need to buy another minolta?


Answer
All camera manufacturers use a proprietary lens mount. Therefore, a Canon lens will not mount on a Nikon or Olympus or Sony or Pentax body and their lenses will not mount on any other body. There are adapters that allow you to use a Sony lens on a Canon or Olympus but you lose a lot of the features like metering and auto focus. The one exception is the Fujifilm DSLR line which uses a Nikon lens mount.

When Minolta introduced the world's first full-featured Auto Focus 35mm SLR in 1985 they changed their lens mount from the MC/MD bayonet mount to the A-mount. After the Konica-Minolta merger, Sony bought the DSLR technology from K-M and is still using the A-mount.

If your lenses are from the SRT or X series of Minolta cameras (MC/MD bayonet mount) then you will need an adapter to use them on a Sony or Canon or Olympus DSLR. If you have an old Minolta Maxxum then they can be used on any Sony DSLR.

slr film camera lens?




sdhar_11@s


i need a lens that has an aperture range that goes from f/1.8 to f/16. does anyone know where i can find one for a decent price like less than $200.00???? also, what slr camera i can use with that lens


Answer
Minolta, Pentax, Olympus, Nikon, and Canon all offered a 50mm f1.8 lens for their 35mm film cameras. A better choice, in my opinion, would be a 50mm f1.4.

Sony, Pentax, Olympus, Nikon, Sigma, Fuji and Nikon all offer 50mm f1.4 or f1.8 for their DSLR cameras.

Usually, you choose a camera first and then buy lenses for it. All manufacturers use a proprietary lens mount which means Sony (and Minolta Maxxum AF) lenses only fit Sony DSLRs; Nikon lenses can be used on Nikon and Fuji DSLRs (Fuji builds their DSLR on a Nikon body); Canon lenses only fit Canon bodies, etc.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

photography: canon 500d 77mm closeup lens?




Jay b


I just got canon 500d 77mm closeup lens to use on nikon 70-200, but it's not working. I mean, everything is really out of focus, i can't even see anything. Am I doing something wrong. I thought it is just a screw on filter to use right away, or do i need some other accessory? Thank you for your time.


Answer
Why do you mount a nikon lens for canon ? May be the focal length of canon is different than nikon. Canon lens works great on only canon body.

Canon A1 lens to Canon 500d?




XMarksTheS


what adapter do i need if any, for a canon A1 lens to a canon 500d body.
links for ebay for adapter will help.
thanks



Answer
http://cgi.ebay.com/2ndGeneration-AF-confirm-Canon-FD-EOS-EF-adapter-60D-/280559926404?pt=Lens_Accessories&hash=item4152acbc84

Not hardly worth the effort, but you'll find that out soon enough.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

When buying a single lens reflex camera what brand is better canon,nikon or sony?




aB


The canon i want is 12.2 mega pixels and it cost around $899 is that expensive or affordable for an 18 year old girl like me?


Answer
There isn't a better brand.

I use Canon for specific reasons.

The big question is Canon vs Nikon; to which I reply:

Canon, Nikon, Canon, Nikon, Nikon, Canon... the great debate stretches on and on and on.

There isn't a better brand. Sure, Ken Rockwell likes Nikon... Sure, other pros might use Canon... (Note: Yes, I think Ken Rockwell is wrong at times and just plain biased in others, but he does have a disclaimer and he does explain why he prefers Nikon...)

You'll notice that almost all sports and action photogs use Canon because when the AF systems were new back in the 90's, Canon's was a lot better than Nikon. And of course, it's not cheap to change...

Now, both are tied. In the beginning it was Nikon and pros. Then Canon caught up. The digital era brought Canon to the throne, and now... yes, there are subtle differences in their different lenses, but you can't compare it directly unless you have the same camera body. Oh, put the camera body to the test as well, but no, it doesn't work that way - they both are excellent brands.

Sure, sometimes Canon's a bit soft; etc. etc... but here's the *general* run down.

Sony = best image quality (in fact, makes sensors for Nikon)
Nikon = best ISO handling
Canon = best of both

Some may not agree, but that's it. Some don't really mind a tiny, tiny, unnoticeable difference in Image Quality and therefore choose Nikon, as its ISO handling is superb. Especially photojournalists, you'll notice.

Personally, I like Canon. But think about the differences, what the lenses are and if you are thinking about getting one, what you're going to do.

Canon makes great macros... etc. etc.

They all have their 'top' lenses:
Canon ~ L
Nikon ~ ED
Sony ~ Carl Zeiss (the most expensive)

In fact, if there was a better brand, the rest would be out of business by now.

So you see, you cannot really compare them.

Recommendations for Canon EOS/Canon compatible lenses?




mislanaday


Found one, the 10-22 wide. That's a $700 dent in my budget.
I'm looking for another, either a good zoom or a good walk around lens, perhaps a combination of both, nothing above 500 bucks as my lens budget has depleted quite a bit.
Any ideas on third party lenses? I'm eyeing a couple Sigmas.

Any suggestion will be much appreciated.
BTW, I shoot city scape, macro and portrait. So I'm in a bit of a pickle. Hard to find a good all around lens for 500 bucks or under.

Quite a few to choose from, I've looked at some, wondering about hands on experience.
Thanks a bunch for your suggestion, Fhotoace.
I'm not in a hurry, it's an investment and I don't want to make a rush decision.
Extending a budget is not completely out of a question.
Haven't considered Tokina, will have a good look at the lens.



Answer
Another Tokina wide angle lens would be the 11-16mm F2.8. It costs a little less than the Canon lens but is a faster constant aperture lens. All the reviews I have seen on it are very good. Ken Rockwell recommends it over the Nikon equivalent. He does say that the Canon lens is a bit better though. If you do alot of low light wide angle shots it might be worth considering.

As for a walk around lens that is less than $500 check out the Canon 28-135 F3.5-5.6 IS USM. Price is about $400. It is a very sharp lens with a good focal length range. With the 10-22 or 12-24 there is only a small gap in range.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Friday, May 30, 2014

I have a Minolta 70-210 lens and a 28mm wide angle lens would this be worth getting a Sony vs Canon or Nikon?




Sue


I am an amateur that purchased a Fuji fixed lens digital camera 5 years ago because I couldn't afford a $900 DSLR. I now would like to purchase a dslr. I love my friends' Canon Rebels but since I have the old Minolta lenses should I go with the Sony? This may be my last camera purchase so I need to make a long term decision. I take mostly scenery, people, and dabble in some close-up nature shots.


Answer
IF your Minolta lenses are the Maxxum AF versions then by all means buy a Sony DSLR. If they are the older manual focus versions sell them on eBay and buy whatever DSLR you like.

However, I will suggest taking a good look at the Sony SLT A33 and SLT A55. These cameras feature Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology (TMT) which allows for full-time continuous auto focus whether you're shooting still pictures or 1080p HD video. TMT also allows shooting at 7fps with the A33 and 10fps with the A55 (fps = frames per second). Both models feature 2D or 3D Sweep Panorama as well. Both models can use the legacy Minolta Maxxum lenses and they will auto focus and meter as they should. Reviews:

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA33/AA33A.HTM

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA55/AA55A.HTM

The difference between them:

http://www.digitalphotographywriter.com/2010/08/sony-a33-vs-a55-whats-difference.html

Which DSLR camera should i choose ?




Deniza Al


Im an amateur in photography and i would like to buy my first DSLR and i've got about 600 euros to buy one. My friends say to choose from canon or nikon because they are one of the best but i really dont know what camera should I choose


Answer
I agree with Hernando. The Sony SLT A55 has Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology which allows for full-time continuous auto focus whether you're shooting still images or 1080p HD video. The A55 also has your choice of 2D or 3D Sweep Panorama as well as in-camera HDR plus a built-in GPS.

Here is a review:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA55/AA55A.HTM

A few more features of the A55 are its use of the legacy Minolta Maxxum "A" lens mount, a focusing motor in the camera body and Sony's version of Image Stabilization which is also in the camera body. This all means that you can add a Minolta Maxxum AF 70-210mm f4 zoom lens and it will auto focus on the A55 and be an IS lens for a fraction of the cost of a comparable Canon or Nikon lens. NOTE: The Maxxum AF 70-210mm zoom lens is a highly sought-after lens by Sony DSLR owners and is known as the "Beercan". You may have to search for one but its definitely worth the effort. On eBay you can pick one up for well under $200.00. A Canon EF 70-200mm f4 zoom (new) will set you back about $1,350.00. Nikon offers a 70-200mm f2.8 for a mere $2,249.00.

Additionally, you should keep in mind the fact that the entry-level Nikon DSLR cameras like the D3100, D5000 and D5100 all require using the more expensive AF-S lenses if you want auto focus.

So take serious look at the Sony SLT A55.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Any suggestions on 35mm SLR cameras for beginners?




Kate


My daughter is in art/photography 101 and needs a 35mm SLR. What brands or models would you recommend? Is a used camera worth it vs brand new?
Thanks for all the education! I ended up buying a used Canon EOS and kit with 3 decent lenses for her pod, and tripod for $250. So that should start her with SLR's I have already invested in several digital cameras for her. I'll buy new once this camera body wears out. Thanks again so many good answers I can't choose. Thanks to you all and let's put it up to a vote!



Answer
A used camera leaves you with a budget for lenses. In that area, I'd suggest Nikon or Canon, as they have the largest support systems and lens selections, including 3rd party lens makers.

If she's looking at film 35mm SLR's, I'd look for the Nikon FM series as it's a solid all-metal manual metering, manual focus camera. The current version is the FM-10 and it sells for under $250 with lens. The N-series camera are of lighter build, but have full automatic options.

If she's looking at digital, I'd look at a used D70 or D50. I have two D70's myself and just recently bought a D50. These two models are well constructed and will work with Nikon lenses, both current digital and film versions.

One more piece of information for you to read.
http://www.jdpower.com/electronics/ratings/digital_camera/dslr

I hope you find this helpful. Feel free to ask, if you have any other questions.

advice from a camera guru about older models?




Maizie


So right now I have a Digital SLR.

I was wanting to buy a few older cameras, just to experiment with ya know?

Do you have any recommendations, or any places where I can look for them? Any advice or opinions would be great!
The camera I have currently is a canon

I'm looking more for a camera that requires film. I'm not really looking for outstanding quality, more of something to do personally . I have no clue what type of a price range these cameras would cost. Probably nothing over 100?? I kind of want that retro feel to it:)
I tagged some photos so you can get a idea of what I'm looking for. Is my price range unreasonable? If so what can i look for at that price.


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3005/2714448873_c05e7f70f9.jpg


http://www.flickr.com/photos/parcelpacker/2553978960/



Answer
Hi Maizie,

There are a few important pieces of information that are missing from your question ~

1) Do you want a film camera or an older digital camera?
2) Do you wish to have compatibility between lenses for your DSLR and any other camera you get?
3) What kind of budget do you have?
4) What is your objective in experimenting? (Understanding mechanics, seeing the difference between types of cameras, having an alternative to a digital image, etc.)

If you add details to your question I will stop back and add to my answer with specific suggestions.

EDIT: Of the two cameras you have indicated the most significant difference is that the Minolta SRT are older models that are completely mechanical (except for the light meter) while the Canon A1 has an electronic shutter linked to the meter. I could not find an A1 model in your price range but a predecessor model the Canon Ftb is similar to A1 but without the electronic shutter. It was a model designed to be a direct competitor with the Minolta SRT 101 & 102 models.

Here are links to a reliable on line used camera dealer's current listings of Canon & Minolta cameras in your price range, this company maintains an extensive repair facility and is one of the largest used camera dealers in the world:

Canon:
http://www.keh.com/camera/Canon-Manual-Focus-Camera-Bodies/1/sku-CA020000252500?r=FE#
http://www.keh.com/camera/Canon-Manual-Focus-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-CA060104001970?r=FE

Minolta:
http://www.keh.com/camera/Minolta-Manual-Focus-Camera-Bodies/1/sku-MI02999091677E?r=FE
http://www.keh.com/camera/Minolta-Manual-Focus-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-MI060105000190?r=FE

Two advantage of mechanical cameras such as these are -
One: They can be repaired fairly easily and there are many old ones around for repair services to scavenge parts from. Electronic parts are much more difficult to replace.

Two: If their light meters fail you can operate the cameras easily without batteries of any kind, using a hand held light meter. (Or use your digital camera to take test exposures).

One caveat with these cameras is that both used a 1.35 volt mercury cell to power their light meters. These cells have been banned in most of the world because of environmental concerns about the mercury content. There are a number of alternatives for dealing with that issue but that would take another whole answer. See this Q&A for more details ~

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsvFtZqbwB0Rxs9WYI7gEwLty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20100722065703AAKlXbl

P.S. My first SLR camera was a Minolta SRT-101. The one in your picture is an SRT-101 model 1b a slightly revised model with an improved film take up mechanism easily identified because they control knob on the top of the camera to the left of the word minolta is black plastic on the earlier models and knurled silver on the model pictured.

Hope that helps. You can email me at the link on my profile if you need more help.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

DSLR Camera?

Q. I was just wondering if anyone could tell me what brand/model of DSLR cameras are the easiest to use, in your opinion? Right now I just have a point and shoot (kodak), and I want to upgrade to a DSLR, but don't want to deal with a complicated camera (a ton of buttons and hard to follow menus). I have searched brands and models before but I just can't tell by what the websites say.

Any suggestions?


Answer
If you have been using a 35mm SLR for a few years, the time to learn the special differences in a digital camera may only take you a few more months. You have to remember to keep your eye on the lighting so you can change the ISO and white balance as necessary.

Right now there are a few Nikon D40's with 18-55mm lens (under $470) and Canon 400D's with 18-55mm lens (under $550) to start your shooting career.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/notcamera.htm

http://www.jdpower.com/electronics/ratings/digital-camera-ratings/dslr

Pick out a couple and then actually go into a store and hold both of them in your hands and see which one feels the best to you and your shooting style

Best brand for a DSLR camera?




Dazzling b


I really like photography and I want to buy a dslr camera. I am a beginner so I need an easy, lightweight, cheap yet excellent camera with a fast shuttter speed and crystal clear resolution? So what is the best brand and what is the best store I can buy one at?


Answer
With buying DSLR's, you generally want to buy the best that you can afford.

The entry level DSLRs offered by Canon and Nikon will not only give you excellent lens selections in their respective brands, they are lightweight, and relatively inexpensive.

Even though these entry-level DSLR's can reach shutter speeds of 1/4000 of a second, or faster, the photo will only be as good as how much light hits that little sensor. and that light is only as good as the glass it's traveling through. In other words, quality lenses are paramount to creating "crystal clear" images. This may take the "cheap" out of the equation, save for the 50mm f/1.8 lenses offered by both of these companies. These lenses are usually under $100, but are built as such. Good lenses can cost upwards of $2000 (some even adding another 0 for the super-telephotos).

I would recommend you read some books on DSLR's, or maybe some forums such as photo.net and canon/nikon user forums. Start out with a body, a good QUALITY lens (not a body/lens kit, as the kit lens tends to leave MUCH to be desired). and throw in one of the 50/1.8 to get the low-light, blurry background shots. Prime lenses usually make you work a little harder, and think a little harder to create your photographs...

As for purchasing, I usually buy from B&H, Adorama, or Amazon (all online, BEST prices, no sales tax!).

Good luck!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Can a Canon FD 50mm lens fit on a 35mm Canon EOS camera?




Island Sun





Answer
No. The old Canon FD and the current EF are completely different lens mounts.
You could *make* your FD lens fit with an adapter, but these are more trouble than they're worth.
---
Hi John.
Yeah, I could have been more specific. Here goes:
None of (Canon's) digital SLRs have a split prism viewfinder to assist manual focusing; metering becomes a wee bit problematic; you lose infinity focus; any glass elements in the adapter will degrade your image quality; and for the privilege of using your old lens in this contorted manner you'll have to shell out roughly $50.
So there's that... or you could get a brand new Canon 50mm f/1.8 EF auto-focus lens for $90 retail or $70 used.
I'm happy for your own success with adapters but they are *not* for everyone.
http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-manual-lenses

Canon AE-1 35mm SLR Manual Focus Camera (Chrome) with 50mm f/1.8 FD Lens... a good camera?




softballpl


I'm in love with this camera, but I need to know a little bit more about it.
-how to get pictures developed
-is it a good camera overall
-any other information I should know



Answer
Canon is a very good company, they make a good product. 35mm cameras are relatively small (for film cameras) and easy to use, and SLRs are especially nice. A 50mm F/1.8 lens is just your normal lens. It would be nice to have a zoom lens. You probably could find one not too expensive since film cameras are on the way out.

The AE-1 was made from 1976 to 1984, and it was extremely popular, selling over 5 million cameras. It was the first 35mm camera with a microprocessor in it! It has modes for full auto exposure, or shutter or aperture priority, so you have the widest range of possibilities for 'creative control'.

If you're not into photography already, you will need to learn how shutter speeds and apertures interact, how to use them. You can learn this better on a 35mm camera than a digital camera. This allows you to control focus (depth of field) and also motion blur, which is a good thing for a photographer to master.

If the camera hasn't been abused, if everything works okay, then it's a good camera, and will last a long time. Open the back and hold it up to the light and snap the shutter several times at various speeds. You'll see the shutter open and close, and you can get an idea of how consistently it works. If the shutter seems to be hanging up, or it makes funny noises, that's not good.

You can get pictures developed anywhere, supermarkets, drugstores, etc. If you want to really get into it, you can develop them yourself. I used to do that. There are also 'custom labs' that professionals use that develop and print much better, but cost a lot more. Or you can get a 'film scanner', a gizmo you run your negatives through and it turns them into very high quality digital pictures that can then be edited with Photoshop or some similar software.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

canon xti lens prices?




.


I have a Canon Xti and I plan on getting a new lens for it. I was just wondering, the higher the price of the lens, the better? Or doesn't that matter?

Sorry for this stupid question D: I'm just curious.



Answer
Yes! The best lenses Canon have are in the L series. They can cost in the thousands.

Canon DSLR Lens question...?




joshme17


Will this lens:
http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-28-80mm-3-5-5-6-Aspherical-75-300mm/dp/B000INVDMI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1204590976&sr=8-1

Work with this camera:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Rebel-Camera-18-55mm/dp/B0000C8VEK/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1204591257&sr=1-11



Answer
Yes, those lenses will work with the Canon EOS Digital Rebel. They are a great combination for a beginner starting off in photography.

The caveat is that it may not be a good combination if you already have the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6. If you have the kit lens, then I would suggest the Canon EF 75-300mm F/4-5.6 III which is only about $130.00 (even less if you purchase a pre-owned lens) on Amazon.com. It has great optics for the price and works rather well with the lens you already have.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Is my 18-135mm lens good enough for Real estate photography?




13 Points


I have a Nikon D80 with the kit lens (18-135mm). is using the lens at the lower side good enough for real estate photography? I have read that 10-24 is the perfect lens and my lens comes in under the higher side of that lens. Just wondering if I have to go out and spend the 500 on the 10-24mm tamron ive been looking at :(


Answer
All the work I do for Realtors is done with the Nikon 12-24 mm f/4 lens, both interior and exterior. As long as your cameras back is parallel to the building walls, you will get NO distortion.

Here is what you do. If you are shooting inside a home with eight foot ceilings, place your camera on a tripod at four feet.. Level the camera so that the film plane is parallel to the walls.

If the ceiling is ten feet, mount the camera at five feet, etc.

18 mm is just not wide enough.

This is a professional photo shoot. Don't go cheap with a generic lens. In business, always buy the best tools.

which lens will i need for real estate photography?




Mariana T


I am doing pics of my house, we are putting it on the market.
I rented 24-70 mm and did the pics, but the bedrooms upstairs are very small and lens did not give me the right angle, I was not able even to get half of the room in the picture?
So I need a lens to capture a good angle of the room? which lens would do the best job?



Answer
I think the ideal real estate lens is a 24mm tilt-shift on a full frame camera, or a 17mm TS for a cropped frame camera.

Although Lightroom and Photoshop will allow you to do architectural corrections, it is a lot easier if you can do them with a tilt-shift lens in camera.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Can a nikon lens fit on a canon camera?




feelfree62


i bought a canon rebel xsi and i was wondering if i can use a nikon 18-55 lens on it. since i brought the camera and lens separately. also would anybody know where i can buy lens for a cheap price?


Answer
If you bought a Canon DSLR you should have bought a Canon lens.

There is an adapter to use a Nikon lens on a Canon EOS body.

Novoflex Lens Mount Adapter - Nikon Lens To Canon EOS Body. $271.00 at B&H Photo. You will have no auto focus or auto metering.

Sell the Nikon lens and buy a Canon lens.

Nikon Coolpix S203 Camera Lens Error?




~~FunkyMon


The other day my camera was sitting upright on a table in our entry way. The lens was extended. I went to pick up the camera and dropped it on the lens onto the floor (about 5/6 feet off the ground onto hardwood). It was jammed for a day until I Googled how to fix it. I hit it against my palm a few times and that seemed to extend the lens and I could take pictures. I went to turn it off and it won't go all the way in and it's jammed. Not sure what to do......I REALLY don't wanna pay for the repairs or buy a new one.

Thanks!

xoxo- Lindzz <3



Answer
Every single day on YA, several people ask for advice about their broken camera.
Little P&S cameras seem to be fragile, they don't like to be dropped, sat on, or squashed in a bag, least of all while they are turned on and the lens is extended.

If you (or your sibling/cousin/dog) have bent your lens, your camera is broken.
If it suddenly won't take photos, or does other extremely weird things, it is probably broken, even if you're not aware that something HAS happened to the camera.

So now that your camera no longer works, there are a few things you can try (regardless of what the actual symptoms are):

1) READ YOUR MANUAL !!!!!! There is a reason why we get those, they are full of good ideas. They also have a trouble shooting section which may help you figure out what is going on.
2) Realize that batteries have a life span - there comes a time where they simply don't recharge properly anymore. With any luck, all your camera needs is a set of brand new batteries.
3) Pull out the battery for 30 seconds - sometimes that resets the camera. Read the user guide if there is a way to "factory reset" the camera.
4) Check the manufacturer's website. You might find good advice, or user forums, or links to their support section, or a person to "live chat" with or all of the above.
5) Take the camera to a local repair shop. If it is just a little P&S, you'll most likely find it will be cheaper to replace it, than it is to repair it. But it is worth a try, right? However, be very careful about paying for a quote..... it may not be worth it.
6) If you have exhausted all other options and you have decided the camera is now a paperweight, start trying to fix it yourself. I have heard people say they managed to bend the lens back into position and the camera worked again.

Good luck, and make sure to be nice and gentle with your next camera (but stay away from Kodaks and Vivitar ...... they seem to break just by looking at them).




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Cheap place to buy Canon EF 100mm f 2 8L IS USM 1-to-1 Macro Lens for Canon?




jawrope


Where can I find a great deal online for Canon EF 100mm f 2 8L IS USM 1-to-1 Macro Lens for Canon


Answer
You can pre-order the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM 1-to-1 Macro Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras from Amazon for $1,049.99.

Technical Details:
* 100mm lens with f2.8 aperture
* Canon's first mid-telephoto macro "L" series lens to include Canon's sophisticated Image Stabilization
* Near-silent Ultrasonic focusing
* Enjoy life-size close-up capabilities without an adapter
* Compatible with 67mm filters

From the Manufacturer:
Canon's newest "L" series lens is its first mid-telephoto macro lens to include Canon's sophisticated Image Stabilization. With the highest quality optics available, combined with near-silent Ultrasonic focusing and life-size close-up capabilities without an adapter, the EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM is simply unrivaled.

You can purchase this lens at the link below.

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro Lens?







Are they the best cheap option for medium level Macro photography??

if not, any other suggestions?

thanks



Answer
Look at the Tokina 100mm Macro f/2.8. It is about $450. It's the lens I have (but in a Nikon mount).

If you have never bought any 3rd party lenses, some of Tokina's lenses rival camera-brand lenses.

The only down-side to the lens is it is an external focus lens (meaning the lens moves in and out during focusing - as does many other macro lenses). This can be an issue if you want to put a macro ring flash on the lens.

The caveat here is if you hang a ring flash on the lens barrel, then you could risk damage to the autofocus motor due to the additional weight. For that reason, you must use manual focus when using a macro flash with this lens - but for macro, you want to use manual focus anyway.

For internally focusing lenses, since the barrel does not move in and out, there is no risk in damaging the focusing motor with a ring flash.

However, I need to stress again that for macro use, you will almost certainly need to use manual focus anyway. Most autofocus systems don't do a good job at the macro ranges, and you will find that the focus system will hunt a lot.




Excerpt from the Tokina 100mm Macro review below:

"It's optical performance is as good or better than the best from Nikon and Canon, and this Tokina's ergonomics, due to its unique focus clutch, is also better than any of Nikon's or Canon's 100mm or 105mm macro lenses".

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/100mm-f28.htm




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Camera Comparison?




photoenhan


I'm looking to get a dslr and it's proven to be difficult to decide. I've read several reviews of the cameras and they seem to be fairly similar. Good anyone give me some ideas-do you have a preference?

This is going to be my "starting out" camera, I will be upgrading in a few years-after school-and I'll probably want to stick with the same camera company-so is there one above the rest that would make for an easy transition?

I will be shooting some landscape photos but mostly people-a few studio type but most outside. For the starter camera I won't be doing sports-the fastest action will be dancing-but the next camera I get will have to be able to take good pictures of action-track/cross county, etc.

My experience with digital is limited to the canon powershot, but have used a 35 mm slr.

The 3 cameras that I've been trying to decide between are:
Nikon D80, Canon Digital Rebel XTi, and Pentax K10D.

Thanks in advance.

~Christen



Answer
At present, those cameras may seem "comparable" but I suggest that you visit a camera shop and hold the three in your hands and see how they FEEL in your hands; my guess is that you'll prefer the Nikon's no-nonsense feel and the ergonomics.

My own personal reason for choosing the Nikon would, of course, be the optics. When you buy a SLR camera, whether digital or film, you're actually buying into a lens system. Lenses normally outlast cameras, unless dropped on a hard service or submerged in water. So, when you buy a lens, you know that it must fit the next level camera. Well, I don't know about Pentax or the Rebel, but I do KNOW that the lens for the Nikon will fit the other digital Nikon cameras currently in popular use: D50, D70, D70S, D100, D200, D2X, and will fit whatever other camera they make in the future (they have NOT changed their lens mount since 1959).

The other reason for choosing Nikon is that the lenses are known for superb engineering and build craftsmanship PLUS superior glass formula (yes, glass AIN'T just glass). I would even suggest that you look at the very versatile Nikon lens: Nikkor AF DX 18-135mm lens, and consider getting "faster" lenses in the future so that you can start building your "arsenal" of lenses that will be with you for many years to come.

I bought all of my "better" lenses on the used market and I saved a bundle for a better grade of brand name and quality rather than go with generic lenses (I learned my lesson a long time ago and vowed NEVER to repeat that error after a most humiliating and most embarrassing experience with a generic lens, which I sold immediately after one use; all the images came our soft around the edges, and I later discovered that it was a common fault with inferior glass used by generic brand companies in order to compete with brand names) (generic lenses are mostly for once-in-a-while photos like vacationers or those who bring out a camera for "special" holidays/occasions; avid photographers are a bit more discriminating and concerned with image detail quality).

EDITED: I should have mentioned that the features at this level of camera are very close to the more expensive "professional" level cameras. The features are there to give you more versatility and means to get things done under a lot of different circumstances that will arise. You'll also find that the features are located where you can easily access them, and in a shot time, you won't have to take your eyes away from the viewfinder to locate the features.

Good luck and very best wishes.

DSLR camera lens comparison?




biggestper


Hi guys.

I have an XTI and have two lenses I'm looking at, hoping to buy one.

I'm looking for something with more zoom than my 75-300mm lens I have now. I found 500mm to be the next step up.

I have a Opteka 500mm f/8 Telephoto Mirror Lens for Canon EOS / Canon EF (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000HCNMPQ/ref=ord_cart_shr/103-1628137-2139811?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=A1P9QRDRYY6FXL&v=glance)

Which looks nice. It has nice reviews and it's quite inexpensive. A big bonus is how small it is! It doens't stick out 2 feet!

The other one in consideration is Opteka 500mm HD Lens for Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT XTi (http://stores.channeladvisor.com/47stphoto/items/item.aspx?itemid=4015373)

This only mentions 500mm, isn't there supposed to be a ###-###mm ratio? It's nice because it's a real lens, not a mirror. Downside is it's MUCH longer in length. It also as f8/-f32 with the OTHER lens only an f8. I don't know what this means.

Only $15 difference. Can I get your thoughts?



Answer
Be aware, both are bargain manual focus lenses. They will give you the extra reach you want, but will not give you the same quality as your Canon 75-300mm. If I could make a suggestion, consider a Canon teleconvertor. It will give you better quality than the Opteka lenses.

The mirror lens requires you use Aperture mode metering, FYI.

The second longer lens is not a zoom, hence no reference to any other focal length other than the 500mm. I've seen Opteka and other companies pair this with a cheap doubler for a 500-1000mm lens, but that's going from bad to worse.

Hope this is helpful.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Thursday, May 29, 2014

How to choose a DSLR Camera Lenses?




V L


I have a Nikon D40 DSLR, If I want to make great pictures to small objects what I need to know for choosing the right lenses, because there are several lenses on sale over the internet, some of them are cheap and some very expensive, what is the basic guide? is the optics quality? thanks for your help


Answer
Basic guideline is to stick with the original manufacturers lenses. So in the case of your Nikon, that means Nikon-Nikkor lenses. Nikon once regarded it's primary line of lenses are professional lenses and only gave special designations to their "cheaper" consumer grade lenses. That is no longer a hard and fast rule. Still you will not exceed Nikon optical quality with Tokina, Sigma or any other non-OEM brand of lens.

As for choosing the right lens, that's largely determined by how you'll use the lens and your budget. For small objects shot close up, you are generally talking about macro photography with lenses that allow very short minimum focus distances of only a few inches in most cases. Nikon gives their macro lenses a "micro" designation. At present, Nikon only offers four lenses with such a designation and the cheapest of them at $450 is their 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro Nikkor lens. This actually is a very good macro lens for your D40. The bad news is this lens will not autofocus on a D40 because D40s do not have a built-in autofocus motor like older and higher-end Nikon bodies such as the discontinued D70/70s or current D90. Thats not really a problem since most macro photography involves manual focus anyway.

The only Nikon lens meant for macro photography that will autofocus on a D40 at this time is the Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR lens. This is also a very good lens but, you may find the 105mm focal length to be a bit too tight and depth of field will be practically non-existent. You can often use other lenses for macro photography but some lenses have fairly long minimum focusing distances that can make macro photography difficult at best.

What are all these FF55 - 200 stuff on the DSLR camera lenses?




Michael


I'm getting a DSLR camera for Christmas and I don't know what all these funky letters and numbers mean.

Thanks in advance!



Answer
Labels, Numbers, They stand for different things.

If you just bought a DSLR you can go to the brand DSLR website and find information about such.

55-200 means that the lens has a 55-200mm focal range. Your kitlens has 18-55, in effect from a group shot to a relative thigh shot. And the 55-200mm is a lens in the tele range meaning it can pull closer for instance a bird in the trees.

Ah you can even see it in effect if you move one of the ribbed rings on the lens you see it extend a bit. Now look through the viewfinder and do it again. Hey wasn't that easy!

The other ring is for focussing, it allows you to manual focus if for instance the automatic focus doesn't cuts it [dark outside or something in the way]

What the other things mean..well that depends on brand and lens brand.

I agree with the others best is to buy a book into the basics of DSLR and read it, keep it with you and most important MAKE ALLOT OF PICTURES. The only way you can learn is through experience! And that means actual doing it.

DSLR's are great tools, but at the same time they are tools, it is the person behind the camera that makes the magic happen. Yes it offers auto modes but one of the nicest thing about the DSLR is control. You get the shot as you desire!

So buy a simple starters guide for your specific model [for instance if you own a Nikon 3100 buy a book that with pictures and easy words tell you what the buttons are for and what does what]

Then buy a book about different types of photography and well again with nice pictures inside so you can see what they mean.

Photography is an art, it is something you can almost touch, taste, feel.. but also it is a technical thing.

So just buy some basic books and actually make pictures. Learn the way get hooked on it.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Which DSLR camera should I get?




Laugh


http://www.nikonusa.com/Nikon-Products/Product/Digital-SLR-Cameras/25462/D3000.html
or
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_rebel_t3_18_55mm_is_ii_kit



Answer
Nikon and Canon are both good products
DPREVIEW allows a side-by-side feature comparison
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=canon_eos1100d&products=nikon_d3000
If considering movies, especially with sound, the Canon is a much newer technology like the CMOS Sensor also, and I like it better from that respect. Also, the higher pixel count gives the ability for better large size pictures. Canon has a superior battery life also. Canon hooked to a PC can do time-lapse photography which is great. Maybe in comparing different models of the same company in the same price range, the result would be different. They are both very nice cameras. I did not try to scour the web for all professional reviews, and the Nikon has some better features than the Canon, like a better flash. Can go to the Main page DPREVIEW and others.
Checking a highly reliable and good priced store (both online+retail location), it shows the D3000 at $459 with one 18-55mm lens, and the Canon is $549, so of course I would expect the Canon to be a better camera. A more fair comparison would be to Canon EOS Rebel XS SLR Digital Camera (Black) with 18-55mm IS Lens Kit at $479 or maybe a Sony Alpha A390 Digital SLR with 18-55mm Lens at $500. In these choices, it is fairly even. The A390 was dropped in price because it could not match competition at its earlier pricing. Theses three are close.
Edit-- Agreed also with Andrew that if you move up to the D3100 and should be in the same price range as the Canon at about $540 each you have comparable cameras with Nikon with the better video and Canon with the better audio and more convenient output formats, but the D3100 is probably a little better than the Canon.

My dslr takes bad pictures?




Hi!


I have the Sony a390 and the pictures don't come out that great as other NIKON or canon cameras do. Every reviews says my camera isn't that good, and I agree. I'm 16 so i don't have much money so this camera was the best I could afford. Will a different lens make the pictures better? I remember reading that its not the camera its the photographer who takes good pictures. So does that mean any dslr can produce good images?


Answer
You are correct that "Its not the camera its the photographer." If you haven't learned about Light, Composition and Exposure then you'd be getting the same results if you were using a Canon or Nikon DSLR. This site has tutorials suitable for the beginner to the professional:
http://www.digital-photography-school.com

Read this review: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA390/AA390A.HTM

Look at the sample pictures made with the A390 here:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA390/AA390A7.HTM

Here is something you might not know about your Sony A390 - it can use any of the legacy Minolta Maxxum AF lenses available on the used market. One of the favorite Minolta Maxxum AF lenses for your A390 is the Maxxum AF 70-210mm f4 zoom known as the Beercan. Under $200.00 on eBay. So don't think that you're limited to buying new Sony branded lenses. Another Minolta Maxxum lens worth considering is the Maxxum AF 50mm f1.4 prime lens. Under $300.00 on eBay.

If you shop on eBay, look for listings by "Top Rated Sellers" and avoid sellers who state things like "I found this in the attic ..." or "I don't know anything about this lens but it looks fine ...". Also avoid sellers with a "No Return Policy" unless you're willing to gamble.

So start learning about Light, Exposure and Composition. Then begin learning to think about those things when you're out with your camera and your pictures will slowly begin to improve. If you've developed what I call the "machine gunner mentality" (very common with digital cameras) where you take 300 exposures and hope - HOPE - a few are worth keeping its time to stop. If all you're doing is point & shoot, point & shoot, point & shoot then you can't be taking the time necessary to think about Light, Composition and Exposure. Your goal should be quality, not quantity. So learn to slow down and think about the picture you want to make and how to make it using your knowledge of Light, Exposure and Composition.

"Pictures are not taken, they are made." Ansel Adams.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Please Let Me Choose The Best Lens For 60D?




Lot Lost K


I've Decided To Buy A DSLR Now, The Canon EOS 60D, And Its My First DSLR. But I'm Extremely Confused About Lenses. I Read Meny Articles, But Those Made Me More Confused.

I Shot Every Types Of Photos, Specially Macro, Landscape, Zoom. So I Might Need An All In One Lens, For Everyday Purpose.

After Many Research, I Decided To Buy These Lenses If I Don't Get Good Solution.

- Tamron 18-270mm
- Canon 50mm f/1.8

I Also Want To Take Another Lens But That Very Costly To Me, The Canon 15-85mm.

Please Suggest Me For Some Cheap Good All In One Lenses.

Also, Do I Need An External Flash?



Answer
At B&H the Canon 60D with the 18-135mm zoom lens is shown for $1,199.00 after a $100.00 "Instant Savings" from B&H that ends 6-30-2012. http://www.bhphotovideo.com

Since you're just starting out I strongly suggest buying the camera with the 18-135mm lens. You didn't mention sports or wildlife as interests so the 18-135mm zoom should be sufficient for your current needs. Spend the next 6 to 8 months learning to use your new camera and exploring the capabilities of the 18-135mm lens.

Other than a couple of memory cards the only additional accessories I'd suggest are these:

1) A UV filter to protect the front element of your lens.
2) A Circular Polarizer for your landscape photography. It darkens a blue sky and enhances colors. It also removes/reduces glare/reflections from glass, water, sand, snow and painted metal - but not polished metal.
3) A lens cloth to clean your filters.

NOTE: Buy quality filters such as B+W, Hoya, Heliopan or Tiffen. Buy them in a "thin" or "slim" mount to avoid any possible vignetting (dark corners on your pictures) when using the wide (18mm) end of your 18-135mm zoom.

You might want to consider adding a tripod to your shopping list especially if you do a lot of landscape photography. I consider a tripod mandatory for good landscapes.

Back when I bought my first 35mm SLR (July of 1971) the camera came with a 50mm f1.7 lens. There really weren't any quality zoom lenses back then. I used my camera and 50mm lens for well over a year before buying a second lens - a 24mm wide angle.

Wider lens adaptor for macro lens?




Alyssa


I have a Canon 5D Mark II and only have a fixed 100mm canon macro lens for it. I'm going on a trip soon and would like to be able to take pictures of landscapes and other wider shots. Is there such thing as a wide angle lens adaptor or something that I can attach to my macro lens? I'd rather not spend $1000+ on a new lens right now...


Answer
Any type of screw-on so-called "wide angle adapter" is a complete waste of money - not to mention the image degradation that it will cause. Your best option in my opinion is the Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM zoom which will be ideal for landscapes and reasonably well-lit interiors. Its shown for $739.00 at B&H - http://www.bhphotovideo.com - after a $100.00 "Instant Savings" from B&H that ends 9-29-2012.

You'll also want a good tripod for your landscapes. If you don't have one then look at the Benro "Travel Angel" series. http://www.benrousa.com/main/




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Wider lens adaptor for macro lens?




Alyssa


I have a Canon 5D Mark II and only have a fixed 100mm canon macro lens for it. I'm going on a trip soon and would like to be able to take pictures of landscapes and other wider shots. Is there such thing as a wide angle lens adaptor or something that I can attach to my macro lens? I'd rather not spend $1000+ on a new lens right now...


Answer
Any type of screw-on so-called "wide angle adapter" is a complete waste of money - not to mention the image degradation that it will cause. Your best option in my opinion is the Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM zoom which will be ideal for landscapes and reasonably well-lit interiors. Its shown for $739.00 at B&H - http://www.bhphotovideo.com - after a $100.00 "Instant Savings" from B&H that ends 9-29-2012.

You'll also want a good tripod for your landscapes. If you don't have one then look at the Benro "Travel Angel" series. http://www.benrousa.com/main/

Photographers, which is better, Nikon or Canon?




1Anonymous


I know the Canon 5D mark III is supposed to be the best camera out there and the Nikon D800 almost matches it, but I don't have 3000 dollars to spend.

So on a smaller, scale say 600-700 dollars,
would you say that the Nikon d3500 or the Canon T3 is better?
I like the 7- 9-blade diaphragm that Nikon offers opposed to the 6- 8- of Canon. But I hear that Nikon has too much magenta in their resolutions or too much yellow in the LCD.

Which has more aperture versatility and accurate shutter speed?

For outdoor/landscape, night, and long exposure photography, and natural looking portraits, which brand is better?

Any recommendations for models by each brand? Like, is it really worth it to get the T3i for such and such more dollars instead of the T3?

Thanks
Whoops- D3200



Answer
First, repeat this 100 times: "It isn't the camera its the photographer." Any DSLR in capable hands will produce good results. Your knowledge of Light, Composition, Exposure and Depth of Field and your skill in using that knowledge will determine the quality of the results.

A DSLR doesn't have "aperture versatility". That is a function of the lens. Nikon and Canon offer a wide variety of lenses with different maximum apertures. The T3 and D3200 both come with an 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 zoom lens. Both manufacturers offer a more expensive 17-55mm f2.8 zoom as an alternative to the standard 18-55mm zoom.

Since all DSLR shutters are electronically controlled its safe to say any make and model will have an accurate shutter speed.

Most beginner photographs use the 18-55mm zoom for outdoor photography. The 18mm end of the standard 18-55mm zoom is suitable for landscapes although anyone serious about landscape photography will eventually want an even wider lens (10mm, 12mm, etc.) and a good tripod.

Natural looking portraits are a result of the photographer's skill in using good lighting and posing techniques and in knowing what lens to use. The make and model of camera is irrelevant.

Long exposure photography requires a tripod and, if done during daylight hours, a Neutral Density (ND) filter.

The Canon T3 is their most basic entry-level DSLR. The Canon T4i when fitted with one of the two available Canon STM lenses (40mm and 18-135mm) will allow for auto focus during video. The T3, T2i and T3i don't have that feature/benefit.

The Sony SLT A65 allows for continuous, full-time, phase-detect auto focus whether you're shooting still images or full 1080p HD video with any AF lens in the Sony lineup. The Technical Image Press Association (TIPA) chose the A65 as their 2012 Top DSLR - Advanced.

The Pentax K-30 has a weather-sealed body and comes with a weather-sealed 18-55mm zoom lens. This makes it usable in the rain or in very dusty conditions that would damage the comparably priced models from Sony, Canon and Nikon.

At http://www.digital-slr-guide.com you can find comparisons of various makes and models of DSLR cameras. Compare them feature by feature.

You'll also find excellent reviews at http://www.imaging-resource.com and at http://www.dpreview.com

Ignore sites that only offer user reviews.

Visit a camera store and physically handle each make and model. One will just "feel" better as you handle it. If that particular models has all the features you want then its the one to buy.

Just remember this: "It isn't the camera its the photographer." It won't matter if you pay $500.00 or $5,000.00 for a camera if you aren't knowledgeable about Light, Composition, Exposure and Depth of Field and, through practice, skilled in their use you'll get the same results regardless of how much you pay for the camera.

Spend time at these sites:

LIGHT
http://photographyknowhow.com/quality-of-light-in-photography/
http://photographyknowhow.com/direction-of-light-in-photography/

COMPOSITION
http://www.photographmad.com/pages/view/10-top-photography-composition-rules

EXPOSURE
http://www.digital-photography-school.com/learning-exposure-in-digital-photography

DEPTH of FIELD
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/depth-of-field.htm

City skyline: http://www.flickr.com/photos/drifter45h/4048051455/ ISO 200, 100mm lens @ f11, exposure for 30 seconds.

Landscape: http://www.flickr.com/photos/drifter45h/3529681412/

Photography is an on-going, never ending learning experience.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What type of camera is recommended for taking photos of home interiors and exteriors?




Aly


Want photos to be flattering. Some features I would like are: Faking incandescent lighting, neutralizing natural lighting from windows, ability to make room look large, removing shadows from objects/lamps, decor, etc.


Answer
Any camera will do, what is important is having a super wide angle lens. Architectural and Real Estate photographers use lenses like the 14 mm and 20 mm when using 35 mm SLR's or full frame dSLR for shooting interiors. 20 mm and 24 mm are more typical lenses for shooting exteriors.

Cameras do not "fake incandescent lighting" nor to they neutralize natural lighting from windows.

It seems that you are attempting to bypass using 85b and ND gels on windows to balance the outdoor light with the interior lighting when necessary or shooting at night to eliminate the extra costs and work.

The key is to always use the correct white balance for the the lighting you are using. For that a tool like X-Rite's ColourChecker Passport is important to use in every different lighting condition.

While a tool like Passport is important, it is not a substitute for shooting home and offices in situ and have them look "natural" to the viewer, it cannot substitute using time honored techniques used by architectural photographers for decades..

When shadows do exist in the scene, the old method of "painting with light" using an incandescent lamp to fill those shadows during long exposures is a time tested technique. This method is best used when using film, since digital cameras cannot take exposures longer than about 30 minutes and the results are not very pleasing. For long exposures (over about ten minutes) you may have to use film in any case.

Look for books by Julius Shulman, perhaps the most well known of all the architectural photographers

As you can see, shooting buildings and their interiors is not a Point and Shoot kind of assignment.

You may want to interview a professional architecural photographer and maybe shadow them on a shoot.

Take a look at the magazine "Architectural Digest" for ideas and to see if you can emulate what those photographers are doing then capturing the essence of the building or room in the magazine

Do I need to mention that you will need a good sturdy tripod, remote shutter release, incident light meter for getting readings throughout the scene to determine where light will be needed to reduce shadows and assure that the focal plane of the camera is parallel to the building to prevent "key-stoning"?

which lens will i need for real estate photography?




Mariana T


I am doing pics of my house, we are putting it on the market.
I rented 24-70 mm and did the pics, but the bedrooms upstairs are very small and lens did not give me the right angle, I was not able even to get half of the room in the picture?
So I need a lens to capture a good angle of the room? which lens would do the best job?



Answer
I think the ideal real estate lens is a 24mm tilt-shift on a full frame camera, or a 17mm TS for a cropped frame camera.

Although Lightroom and Photoshop will allow you to do architectural corrections, it is a lot easier if you can do them with a tilt-shift lens in camera.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

i am buying canon 60d but i want a good zoom lens under 600$ and telephoto under 400$?




Parshant M


my selections for telephoto lens are
ef 50mm 1.8
ef 50mm 1.4

zoom lens
70-200 4.0l nd
i am getting 18-135 is lens with kit 2
and can you please suggest me some more lenses and i also want to know how to shoot images and videos in cinematic look nd how to install marvel cinestyle and is cinestyle godd



Answer
The 50mm lenses are not telephotos.

The 70-200 f/4 is decent, but I don't think you can get one even close to $600 unless you buy used from ebay.

Good canon lens for portrait photography under $600? Do I need a filter to tag along with it?







I'm looking for a good canon lens that seems to fit in for portrait photography. When I say portrait photography, I'm also saying pictures of people with blurring backgrounds and all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cmlx9LJbE0&feature=channel

there's a video of the kinds of portrait photos I would want, but mostly portraits of people. What kind of canon lens should I get for those kinds of pictures? I heard that it's 85mm. I think there's one Lens that's under $600, but I don't know if there are other goods ones that are similar. If there are more that are better, but over my budget, just tell me, My budget will increase by time.

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=152

Here's the website with the two 85mm lenses and more. It's the Standard/Medium telephoto page of canon's US page.



Answer
You have a few options for a portrait lens under $600..
For full body portraits, consider the Canon 50mm f/1.8 or Canon 50mm f/1.4
For head-to-waist to head-to-shoulders portraits, consider the Canon 85mm f1/.8
For head-to-shoulder to head-only portraits, consider the Canon 100mm f/2

Hope this helped and good luck!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

SLR DIGITAL CAMERA HIRE/RENTAL?

Q. I'm wanting to hire or rent a digital camera SLR for my HSC body of work for visual arts, only for a week at max, or even one/two days ... i don't really care. I've tried looking on GOOGLE and it seems so expensive...

Does anyone know any cheap rental/hire places etc, in the Sydney area?


Answer
What you need to find is a good camera store in your area. I am in the US but I'm sure that you can find a couple of good camera stores in Sydney. Most good privately owned camera stores here rent out equipment at reasonable rates. You should be able to rent a good DSLR camera and lens for $50-$100 US dollars a day. A lot will depend on the value of the camera and lens. You will probably need to have a credit card that will cover the replacement cost of the equipment if you break it or don't bring it back though.

How Much and Where could I rent a DSLR Camera - Chino Hills?




Philosophi


Looking to rent a DSLR Camera around the Chino Hills Area.

Nothing too extravagant or amazing; just something sufficient enough. How much do you think it'd cost (with lens and everything) for a one day rental? And where could I find such a place?

Thanks!



Answer
All you have to do is look in the Yellow pages for Cameras, and start calling the stores to see if they rent. If no stores are listed under cameras, see if there is a Ritz or Wolfe store in the White pages. They would probably be the only ones who would do this.

If you do find such a store, I'm pretty sure they will require a hefty deposit, or a credit card to insure the camera will be returned in excellent condition.

Just remember, you can't learn all you need to know in one day, or expect to get outstanding pictures just because it's a DSLR. It all depends on your skill as a photographer, too.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

DSLR camera?




Caitlin


I'm looking for a digital SLR camera. Preferably not too expensive. Does anyone have suggestions?


Answer
Two cameras come to mind when you ask for a DSLR that's not too expensive. Here you go:

~~~~~~~~~~

Nikon D40

The Nikon D40 is a great little camera, very easy to use and quite reasonably priced. It has a few "consumer friendly" totally automatic modes that make it very easy to use, but still offers total photographic control when you are ready to take charge. It will get you in the Nikon family which is a great place to be. If you buy accessories and lenses, you will be able to use everything on any Nikon that you might upgrade to later on.

Check out Nikon's "Picturetown" promotion, where they handed out 200 D40's in Georgetown, SC. http://www.stunningnikon.com/picturetown/

Here are a few reviews, in case you have not read them yet. Be sure to note that they are several pages long and some of the reviews also have some sample images that you can look at.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40/
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/nikon_d40.html
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3756/camera-test-nikon-d40.html
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40/d40-recommendations.htm

I hate to see people slam the camera because it can't autofocus with older Nikon lenses. It is true that there is a "slight problem" with older Nikon lenses not autofocusing on the D40, but if you do not own a bag full of older lenses, it is not going to be a problem. It is barely a problem anyhow. If you check www.nikonusa.com for "AF-S" lenses, which are ALL 100% compatible with the D40, you will find 23 lenses, including 7 "VR" (vibration Reduction) lenses and one true macro lens with "VR". There are another 25-plus lenses in the current catalog that provide all functions except autofocus as well as many (possibly dozens) "out of print" lenses that will work just as well. In addition, although these lens will not autofocus, most of them will still give focus confirmation. From the D40 manual: "If the lens has a maximum aperture of f/5.6 of faster, the viewfinder focus indicator can be used to confirm whether the portion of the subject in the selected focus area is in focus. After positioning the subject in the active focus area, press the shutter release button halfway and rotate the lens focusing ring until the in-focus indicator is displayed."

The D40 only has 3 autofocus zones arranged horizontally at the center, 9 o'clock and 3 o'clock positions. This might be considered a limitation, but realistically, most people will find this perfectly adequate, especially if you are moving up from a point and shoot with only a center zone.

You can get the D40 with the 18-55 kit lens at B&H Photo available through Yahoo! Shopping or at 1-800-622-4987) for $550 (May 2007) and this is with TWO Lexar 1 GB cards. You can get the same kit with one Lexar Platinum (higher speed) card for $560. Or - get the D40 with 18-135 lens and 1 GB Lexar card for $760.

~~~~~~~~~~

Pentax K100D - Cheapest Decent SLR

The cheapest DSLR that is worth owning is probably the Pentax K100D, and this is coming from a Nikon fan. This is a decent camera.

You can click on individual user comments on this page:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/read_opinions.asp?prodkey=pentax_k100d

You can read the dpreview.com "Highly Recommended" review here:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk100d/

You can also read this review of the K100D here:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/k100d.html

I used to recommend the Pentax K110D as the best entry level dSLR, but I do not see it for sale at B&H Photo or Adorama. The entry level seems to now be the K100D. The only difference between these two cameras is that the K100D includes "shake reduction," which adds some expense to the camera.

Adorama has the K100D with the 18-55 lens for $489.95, after a $50 rebate. The rebate ends on July 31, 2007. You will still need a memory card and I would suggest at least the 1 GB Sandisk Ultra II SD card, which costs about $30. You can get the 2 GB for $35, so it would be silly not to go for the 2 GB card.

As of this writing (5-9-07), B&H is NOT showing the $50 rebate on the K100D with the 18-55 lens, but they ARE showing it for the body alone. Since this is a Pentax manufacturer's rebate, I would speculate that this is an error on the web site. If you prefer buying from B&H, you can call them at 1-800-622-4987 to inquire about this matter.

If you want "higher" quality and want to spend double the money, get back to me............and I'll tell you about the Nikon D80.

~~~~~~~~~~

any good DSLR cameras that work well for close up/Abstract photography?




Rachel


i have been using just a digital camera with auto focus but i appreciate the close up work it can do. on problem is that the auto focus doesn't focus on the subject i want (sometimes it will focus in the background or go from blurry to sharp back to blurry) i was looking for a price range 300-400 dollars but i am open to other price ranges if need be. any suggestions of good cameras. im a beginner level "photographer" so i dont know much about lenses or anything too technical. thanks so much!
i was looking at the sony alpha dslr. the reviews were pretty good and i saw it in the store *good size and all* but at the store i wasnt able to take any sample pictures or see how everything worked since it wouldnt turn on. would this camera be good for what i need?



Answer
Any dSLR will do, they are all much the same at that price. They all take EXCELLENT pictures in the right hands.

If you like the Sony, buy it.

You'll get all sorts of nonsense and misinformation from Canon and Nikon users about Sony, that's all it is, nonsense. Ignore it.

The 18-55mm lens isn't a macro lens (they cost a lot). But it will focus at 25cm (10 inches).

Edit: as I predicted, the anti-Sony nonsense has started about a lack of lenses, well I actually do macro on a Sony and here is a list of lenses. As you can see, people here are generally anti-Sony and clueless:

Sony 30mm f2.8
Minolta 50mm f2.8
Sigma 50mm f2.8
Minolta 50mm f3.5
Tamron 60mm f2.8
Sigma 70mm f2.8
Sigma 90mm f2.8
Tamron 90mm f2.8
Sony 100mm f2.8
Cosina 100mm f3.5
Voigtländer 100mm f3.5
Minolta 100mm f2.8
Tokina 100mm f2.8
Sigma 105mm f2.8
Voigtländer 125mm f2.5
Sigma 180mm f2.8
Sigma 180mm f3.5
Tamron 180mm f3.5
Sigma 180mm f5.6
Minolta 200mm f4 G
Minolta AF 3x-1x f1.7-2.8

These are all macro lenses, the list doesn't include the MANY zooms that also have a macro capability.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Nikon DSLR lens help please?




jattyjattj


I was wondering if someone could tell me, if travelling to a country that has alot of humidity e.g. India, Pakistan, Middle East. What can you do to protect your lens from getting damaged? and where can they be stored? Cheers


Answer
I keep them in the lens pouch with dessicate packettes like the ones that com packaged with the lens or camera . You can get extra dessicate at places that sell guns and gun safes. Actually though well made lenses are pretty tight and so I have been to southern US, the carribean, central and south america and have never had a problem

Which Camera to buy in below 35000 price range?




Neeraj


Hi..actually it was a dream for me to buy a camera(NIKON or CANON) for many year i was wishing ,so when it comes closer to buy a camera i am actually confused.its because i am confuse with DSLR or Bridge camera(Long Zoom-Point and Shoot) to buy.also adding more detail i actually like to take distance photos(long zoom) also meeting low light conditions in the night photos.also adding i like to buy a DSLR camera but with the money in my hand (about 35000) i cannot but a long ranged(in zoom) DSLR camera..
some of the cameras that i have researched through this period : Nikon series P510,D3100,D3200,D5100 & CANON series SX40HS,1100D,550D
also Its not a case of mixing both DSLR and point and shoot ...i am actually confused with long zoom range of point and shoot(bridge) cameras and DSLR's long shoot camera lens are high price range(and mine only a budget of 35000)
so kindly please provide a suitable suggestion for which camera (also any other cameras u can suggest) to buy within my price range


thanks in advance
Suggest a Camera to buy in below 35000 price range?



Answer
True you can get a DSLR with the 18-55mm kit lens for 35k
but long zoom or low light will mean additional lenses
and mind you quality lenses cost money ... loads of money

35k for a bridge sounds more reasonable
Panasonic have launched the Lumix FZ200, unfortunately yet to be launched in India
Ditto features as the FZ150, http://www.panasonic.co.in/wps/portal/home/products/digitalav/digitalstillcamera/superzoom/dmcfz150
but with a constant aperture of F/2.8 throughout its zoom range + more
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=panasonic_dmcfz150&products=panasonic_dmcfz200

Hopefully price will be 35 to 40k
check if it suits you




Powered by Yahoo! Answers