If I were to get a DSLR camera that did all this, what brand/model would it be?

d7000 dslr camera with 18-105mm lens image

Gavin

I'm trying to get back into photography, but a bit more professionally than before. I used to have a simple point-and-shoot digital that took nice pictures, but didn't have many features.

As someone who is essentially new to taking photos (especially new to tweaking settings and modes, and I know little to nothing about ISO, but I'm in the process of learning from a friend), I want something a step or two above a beginner's DSLR. Preferably Canon or Nikon (I have my eye on the Nikon D3100, D3200, D5100, and D7000 with the 18-105mm lens or 18-55mm and 55-200mm lens kit. I'm happy to switch gears and try for different lenses/filters, but I don't want to do too much work to attatch them to the camera. Same brands, please). So long as I can get 1-2 extra batteries, pop in a 16 GB+ SD card or memory stick, and get a relatively durable bag to hold everything in, we're good.

-Low/dim and/or dingy light, at night or in shadow
-Bright/reflective lights off glass or water
-Photo shoots for cosplay and modelling during the day, or at night
-Flash, preferably built in
-Large LCD screen
-I prefer the look of a photo using a Full Frame Sensor, but it's not mandatory
-Anti-shake
-Possibly water-proof or water-resistant

I'd prefer something with a little weight to it, but not so heavy I have to use a tripod to hold it up. Video recording would be a boon, but not something I have to have. I'm prepared to spend anything between 1,000$ and 1,500$, preferably not over 2,000$. I have a Best Buy and a Radioshack nearby, but I'm also comfortable ordering online.
An edit I forgot, I'm happy to start low on the totem pole and work my way up, so long as all I have to upgrade is the camera base itself and not all of the accoutrements.
Wow. You know you know nothing when someone's post is the size of your hand, and you've never even heard of the top brand they suggest...

Thanks for the info, I'll be sure to look into Pentax Digital SLRs. The LAST thing I want to do is buy a flashy camera I can't use, just because it's flashy and expensive or well-known.

I was hoping for a single lens I could zoom in and out with manually to my heart's content. I think I just don't quite know what 18-55 and 55-200 really mean. I'm not loving the idea of having to buy 3 and 5 prime lenses just to do the work I thought might've been done with 1, but if the quality just isn't there, then there's no point. Maybe I can learn to get away with just 1 as I start out.

If Anti-shake was the only thing I couldn't get, I might've been fine trying to stick with Canon and Nikon, but if there's the hope of being able to use my camera in the rain, all the better. And if HD video is the only t
Whoa! Just got an eyefull of the price of that particular lens..WELL over much budget.


So, to break it down...if I got the K-30 Body Kit (which I'm assuming is just the camera and the bare basics), it's about 600$. Is there a prime lens or two I can get for maybe less than 800$ total?

Answer
If you want something a step beyond an entry level drop the all the Nikon bodies below the D7000. All the lenses you are looking at are just OK. If you want to learn the craft of photography, and you have the money to get started, look at better glass. Buy once and be done that's my motto.

Don't waste time and money buying mediocre zoom lenses, only to flip them for something better. the 18-55 and 55-200 are the worst lenses out there. that's why every camera company pushes them and puts them in "kits", they are cheap.

For zooms, look at fast f/2.8 stuff, like the 24-70. That's a workhorse for a lot of working photographers. To save money, look at used or third party models from Tamron or Sigma.

Try prime lenses. They are superior to zooms. their only negative is the lack of zoom.

Back to your camera requirements, there is no Canon or Nikon that meets your needs. Only Pentax has Anti shake built in, weather sealed models, and some weather sealed lenses too. Pentax also uses superior Sony Exmor image sensors and they stayed with the better 16MP versions, so it will be better in low light at high ISO. Look at last years K 30 or the new K 50. The top of the range for Pentax, the semi pro K5 II. The only real fault I see with Pentax is their HD video. It's OK, but not the best machine for video, but for short clips here and there is should not be an issue.

I'd skip full frame. Sure full frame rocks, but it costs a lot. A Nikon d600 FF is just over 2K, so is the Canon 6D, and Sony full frame A99 is about 2.5K all these are body only, no glass. Pentax has no FF models.

And finally, to get the most out of any camera, you need to put in the work. I work part time as a photographer, mostly events, and I meet people at every event that have dSLRs. Some cost more than mine. It's rare that I meet anyone that actually knows anything about photography, or even knows how to really use their camera. They put their 3,000 dollar camera with a 18-135mm or 24-105 lens that might cost another 500 to 800 bucks and they can't figure out why I'm getting the shots at night, and they are not. Sometimes they will chat me up and in a minute I can figure out they don't know what I'm talking about.

Don't be that person, if you really love this craft of photography start at the bottom, and learn the relationship between ISO, aperture and shutter speed. Know it, learn it, live it. best of luck.

Which one is best among D90 and D5200/D5100 Nikon SLR cameras ?

Kishore

Want to buy SLR Nikon camera.. Can someone please advise which one is good among above models and also advise the good lense.

Answer
Okay, first of all they are all good cameras and any of them would give you excellent images.

The D90 has the weakest sensor and lowest image quality of the three, but it is the most weather resistant, heaviest and physically strongest of them. It also has an in-body focus motor, meaning that it will autofocus with older AF-D lenses. That motor may not matter if you don't already have lenses unless you are intending to buy secondhand lenses. The D90 is also better with flash, particularly for controlling multiple flash setups (which isn't going to be cheap!)

The D5100 outperforms the D90 in nearly about every other respect. The sensor is better, particularly in low light where noise is much reduced. The moveable screen is very useful.

The D5200 is a bit of an unknown. We know the specifications, but no reliable independent reviews have been seen yet. The 24MP sensor is not the same one as the D3200, so it's hard to compare. It's likely that image quality will be better than the D5100, but that comes with larger file sizes which mean you will need a faster PC with more RAM and disk storage to cope with it.

The D5100 is capable of 4928 x 3264 pixel pictures. That would give you a 24"x16" enlargement at 200 pixels per inch, which would be good quality. Just how big do you want to go?

The D5200 is likely to have improved video over the D5100, but that and the extra resolution come at quite a big price hike. Can you afford that extra and do you need the extra resolution?

The other option is the D7000, which combines all of the advantages of the D90 and the D5100 with the exception of not having the D5100's moving LCD screen or built in effects like HDR - and then adds quite a lot of advanced functionality.

If you can afford it - and don't mind the weight - the D7000 is a great camera and I'd highly recommend it. Review here: http://www.steves-digicams.com/camera-reviews/nikon/d7000-dslr/steves-conclusion-118.html

For lenses, the 18-105mm VR lens is quite a lot better than the standard 18-55mm VR kit lens, but if you can afford it the 16-85mm VR is better again and a lot more flexible if you do any wideangle work. The 18-200mm VR is a good all-rounder, but it is quite big and expensive. Having said that, as kit lenses go the 18-55mm VR is a good one and would get you off to a good start if you can't afford better.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

wide angle lens for real estate photography?

best canon lens real estate photography image

Mariana T

I have canon 7d and need a wide angle lens to take pictures of real estate.
which one is the best?
I heard 24-70mm f2.8 is the best so far, but need some opinions from others.
thanks

Answer
24-70 f2.8 is an AWESOME lens BUT on a 7D it's not really a wide angle.

The 7D is what is known as a cropped sensor camera. The sensor is smaller than a full frame camera and has a crop factor of 1.6.

What does this mean? It means that your 24-70 on a 7D (or any other cropped sensor camera like a 60D, Rebel T1i, Rebel XSi ...) has a field of view equivalent to a 38.4mm - 112mm lens. 38mm is not really wide angle ... even 24mm is borderline.

The Canon 16-35 f2.8 would give you an equivalent of 25.6mm - 56mm.
http://www.henrys.com/368-CANON-EF-16-35MM-F2-8-L-II-USM-LENS.aspx

The Canon 10-22 f3.5-4.6 would give 16-35mm but it is a EF-S mount and won't fit on cameras above the 7D (6D, 5D, 1D ...) but EF lenses work on all modern Canon DSLRs.
http://www.henrys.com/23933-CANON-EF-S-10-22MM-3-5-4-5-USM-LENS.aspx

Don't get me wrong ... I LOVE my 24-70 f2.8 but it is NOT a wide angle lens ... not by Canon's classification system and certainly not on a cropped sensor camera.

Canon camera 550d or 7d? Which one should I choose?

Eva85

I am new to photography. I would like to upgrade my Canon 10d camera and purchase either digital SLR Canon 550D, 7D or maybe 60D. I can not decide which one will be a better choice for me. I do not shoot sports. I need it for architecture, real estate, micro photography and still life. Any recommendations?Thank you very much!

Answer
All of the ones that you listed use the same sensor, so you wouldn't gain anything in terms of image quality by choosing the more expensive ones.

Any less than the 60D would feel like a downgrade in terms of ergonomics, as the 550D and 600D have only one dial and no top LCD. The 60D too would feel like a downgrade in terms of build quality due to its plastic body, you're likely accustomed to your 10D's magnesium alloy body (that's purely a psychological issue though).

As fhotoace mentioned, a good lens would do much more for your photography than a new camera would, and getting a used 40D or 50D might be the best choices. If you absolutely want a new camera and are already well supplied with lenses, then the 60D would be my choice here. There is no reason whatsover for your purposes to even consider a 7D.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Is the Pentax K2000 a good camera to buy?

best canon kit lens replacement image

Donald

I already have a digital camera a Canon Powershot A590 but it lacks the ability to change lenses. I'm looking to upgrade to a DSLR camera and i ran across this camera Pentax K2000. Is this a good camera to buy or is there something better i can buy?

Answer
Buy the newer K-x, it's a replacement for the K2000. The K-x is 650 with kit lens and comes in either white, red, blue, or black. It also has HD video recording, live view, 4.7 FPS, 11 AF points, and up to 12,800 ISO, which is a HUGE improvement over the K2000 and is WELL WORTH the extra pricing over the K2000. I would never get the K2000 with this differential in pricing, I would save up the extra money and get the K-x over it instead. The new K-x has iso levels exceeding the Nikon D300s and D90 which are flagships in APS-C noise levels, with 650 USD you can get better iso noise levels. This camera is a no-brainer and must-have for anybody who knows the technological side of DSLR's and wants to get into the entry-level league. This 12,800 shot below took my breath away, there is no APS-C sensor that will take images at 12,800 with more clarity than the K-x. http://www.lismore.net/images/kx/20091024-IMGP0445.jpg

How much does the Rebel XTi cost?

Alexis

By tomorrow, I will have saved up $430. I've been looking to buy the Canon Rebel XTi, but I have not been able to see a decent price. The cost isn't a worry to me as much as the different prices I see. One website will say 500, and the other says 900! How much does this product really cost and where is the best place to buy the Canon Rebel XTi KIT!

Answer
First off buy from a reputable dealer. There are more scam camera sites than there are porn sites on the internet.

Part of the difference in price could be what lenses are included with the camera. Also be careful of all the places that load you up with accessories. 90% of them are useless pieces of junk that you absolutely don't want.

The XTi has been discontinued for a while now. You wont find many new ones. If you don't mind used you should be able to get one with the 18-55mm lens for about $350.
If you can find a new one it should be $500 or less.

Personally I think you would be better off just getting a new Rebel XS for $500 with a 18-55mm lens. I think the XTi is a slightly better camera but they have not made it in over a year. The XSi was its replacement or upgrade.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Canon 7D vs. Canon 50D vs. Canon T2i looking to get my first nice camera; thoughts, opinions and experiences?

best canon 7d lens for wildlife image

sammyp54

Every single detail and experiences you can give me is appreciated along with lenses. What type of lenses should i start with, the top three types would be nice to know? I have begun doing my research and will continue to. If i get the 7D the number of different lenses that i would get is quite different than if I got the T2i.

Answer
Forgive my long answer, but your question covers a lot of territory.

First off, all three are good cameras.
Secondly, do NOT get a 50D right now. The 60D is due to be announced soon, so you could either look at that or get a 50D at reduced price once it's announced.

I would take a good look at how much you want to spend. Getting the nicest (7D, without a doubt) body is tempting, but it's much smarter to start off getting high quality lenses. In most situations you're not going to get better image quality with a 7D over a T2i, but with a $1000 lens vs a $500 lens, you will see a large quality difference.

As far as what lenses to get, that really depends on what you want to shoot. A few suggestions.
No matter what you want to do, I'd suggest getting the Canon 50mm f/1.8 II. This lens runs around $120, and is the best quality lens you can buy. It is fantastic for a range of things, but is notably good for portraits and any low light situation.

If you do want to do portraits, the lens range (and when I say range, I'm talking focal length, or mm) you want to look for is around 50mm to 150mm. You do not want to use a wide angle for portraits, as it will cause distortion in a persons features that is more often than not un-attractive. The 50mm f/1.8 is a great lens for portraits, other good ones include the 85mm f/1.8 (if you want to be a bit further away) If you want to spend a but more money, there's the 50mm f/1.4, which is higher quality, focuses faster, and is slightly better in low light than the 50mm f/1.8. The very high end lenses (which, in the Canon lineup is denoted by an L in the name, and a red ring around the end of the lens) you're looking at the 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L, the 135mm f/2L, and to some extent the 24-104 f/4L and the 24-70 f/2.8L. All of these lens run at least $1000 and you should do a lot of research before settling on one.You'll notice that most of the lenses I recommended are prime, not zoom lenses. (primes being fixed focal length, such as 50mm, and zooms having a variable focal length, such as 24-70.) Portrait photographers use primes a lot more because they are sharper, and allow for better control of background blur.

If you like to do nature, wildlife, and landscapes, you'll want two lenses, something wide to capture a good view, and a powerful telephoto lens to bring you closer to wildlife. Two suggestions I have are the Canon 10-22mm the Canon 70-300. The 10-22mm is an EF-S lens, meaning it will only work on cameras that have APS-C sized sensors. Those being the Rebel cameras, 10/20/30/40/50D, and the 7D. If you ever get a 5D series or 1D series camera, you will not be able to put that lens on it. The 10-22 is well known for being, first, very wide, and second, very high quality. On the telephoto side, I'd go with at least a Canon 70-300, if not something more powerful. I personally use a Sigma 150-500 lens.

If you want to do macro work as well, at the least you'll want a set of extension tubes. These run about $130 (look for Kenko brand ones). these go in between a lens and the camera, and give the lens macro capabilities. They do cut out light in the process. If you want to do a lot of macro, you want a macro lens. The Canon 60mm macro is a good start, however it is EF-S like the 10-22 I mentioned above, thus it wont work on 5D and 1D series cameras. The canon 100mm f/2.8 is also a very good macro lens, and sigma makes several good macro lenses as well.

There are a LOT more lenses out there, trust me.

I would also recommend getting a flash, as it can really improve your photography. Make sure whatever you get has manual functions, tilt, and swivel, otherwise you're just getting a more powerful version of the pop-up on the camera. The Canon 430EX II is a great place to start, but there are other makers of flashes as well.

Also, there's video. If you don't care about your DSLR having video' I'd recommend waiting for the 60D to come out and then buying a discounted 50D. The 60D will have video.

Otherwise, I would actually suggest staying away from the 7D. It is a fantastic camera (it's one of the cameras I own and use on a regular basis) but most of its features are things you probably wouldn't be able to appreciate at this point. I think you'd be much happier in the long run getting a T2i, 50D, or 60D and spending more money on lenses. You will be able to notice the difference much more, and better yet, lenses don't get outdated nearly as fast, so they're very good investments.

www.dpreview.com is great resource for reviews, as well as a great side-by-side comparison of camera features (look under buying guide). There are tons of other great sites out there to help you choose.
Check out http://photography-on-the.net/forum/. Thats a forum dedicated specifically to Canon cameras, and the people there are extremely helpful.

Also, if you have any questions about what I said here, or further questions about this in general, you can send me an email on my profile.
I hope this helps!

Which camera will work best for my needs?

radical

I have 3 cameras in mind - the Nikon D5000, the Canon T3, and the Canon T1i.
For the most part, I usually take photos of scenery/wildlife from afar.
With the T1i, I'd be getting an 18-55 lens
The T3 an 18-55 also and a 75-300,
and with the D5000 a 15-55 and 55-200.

Answer
truth be told, the biggest factor here is not going to be the camera body, its going to be the glass you put infront of it.

i've shot on both nikons and canon bodys and personally prefer canon, but thats entirely down to preference, check your local camera store and ask to have a play with each, feel out what you like, and then ask them to load the shots onto a computer so you can compare. this way you can try to take a similar shot a few times and then compare the results yourself. www.dpreview.com is a bit of a bible for photography - they do great reviews on cameras, and also lenses.

currently i am shooting on a 5d mkii and a 7d and i use L lenses on both, but there are some good standard lenses out there, again i would say ask to demo the ones in your budget, and compare the shots. if you are shooting to try and get closer to far away objects, and create more of a portrait of a landscape then look at telephoto lenses, (somewhere between 70mm and 150mm would be plenty) but you wont get the sense of "being there" at that focal length - if you want to capture a whole scene then you will want a wider lens, so should be looking at something with a 20-50mm range.

there are some lenses out there with ridiculous zooms on them where you may get a very very wide focal range, however what you will probably find with these lenses, is that the quality of the glass to make them affordable is compromised, and you may see barrel distortion, or heavy vignetting on your shots that is hard to remove in post, however if you want to do any portrait work, wide angle lenses are not very flattering for your subject, and tend to warp peoples faces so that they look distorted - it can create a good effect, but limits you to a certain style of portrait, and is not ideal for regular portrait use.

I hope that this helps.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

How to prevent camera lens from getting foggy in a greenhouse?

dslr camera lens cleaning image

Q. So yesterday I had gone to a greenhouse to take some pictures. And my DSLR camera lens fogged up, therefore I can't take any pictures. What should I do?

Answer
It takes time for the equipment to acclimate to a climate change.

You could continue to wipe the lens with a microfiber cloth (in circles starting at the center) OR, let the camera sit in the greenhouse for 20-30 minutes before you use it.

For example, when I know I am doing a shoot outside in the winter, I put my equipment in the trunk of my car an hour or so before the shoot. That way it has time to acclimate from inside to outside. Of course I make sure to wipe down/ clean everything afterwards and it is stored with a lot of desiccant packs to absorb moisture.

Will glasses cleaning cloth damage camera lens?

mich�

I just got a new DSLR camera recently, and today I noticed a fingerprint on my lens, so I used my glasses cleaning cloth to gently clean it. I'm going to get a proper lens cleaning pen over the weekend, but I'm worried that what I've done today may have damaged the lens. Could it have?

Thanks in advance.

Answer
the cloth will not damage the lens. it is grit in the dust that will scratch the delicate lens coating when you wipe. cleaning with air is a first step, while that won't remove a finger print, it will clear out the dust, making it safe to use a more aggressive cleaner.

back in the day, when we used Kodachrome Film, a UV filter was mandatory to keep the exposures from turning blue. And many of us older types can remember an incident where having a filter on the lens saved catastrophic damage. So we mostly continue with the filter routine, and consider the keeping of fingers and dust off the lens as a bonus.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

I need a DSLR camera for filming video. What camera and accessories should i get?

dslr camera old lenses image

Raymond

Hello, i am looking for a dslr camera for video. I am trying to get the video possible so right now price is not very much of a factor. Also Memory space is not a factor either. I just want hand down the best possible dslr video. If its important i am mostly filming professional snowboarding in both day time and night time situations.For me distance is not really much of a factor because i can get as close as i want.Right now i am looking at the nikon d800 mostly, but also the d7100 and the d4. I am also considering cannon but i prefer nikon. So, anyways what would be the best camera, lenses, mic and general setup including anything else necessary to get the best filming possible?

Answer
To answer your questions would be an entire college course in motion photography, and this would not be the venue for that. But I do want to weigh in -
1. Don't pay any attention to those who say a DSLR can't do quality video. While there was a time when still cameras' video quality was sub-par, that time is largely over. Even some professional videographers are now buying higher-end DSLRs for their relatively low expense and availability of a wider selection of lenses. The market for pro dedicated video cameras is still strong, especially with newer tech like 4K and 8K beginning to take hold, but the lines are becoming more blurry every day between pro video and DSLR cameras.
2. Listen to photoace. I've been watching these questions for over 6 months now, and when I see he's answered I rarely see a point in adding anything. He is THE MAN - the only reason I'm saying anything now is to counter the naysayers, and to point out that the links photoace provided are over 3 years old, which is still in the right direction, but just needs to be said that things have progressed even further than they suggest (3 years is a long time in tech years). Here are a couple of links to current info I have found:

http://nofilmschool.com/?awt_l=OhIMk&awt_m=3jycuxSUmbBjwS7
http://www.redsharknews.com/

If you have $5-$10K to spend on low-medium end video equipment, or $15-$25K for the real pro thing, by all means go video camera (and many don't like the term "camcorder" - sounds very consumerish)
But if you want some really good gear (and don't forget the audio!) for up to $5K, you can do well with a DSLR.

What is the best DSLR camera for a just starting out photographer?

Sportygirl

So I'm looking into getting a DSLR camera, I have done quite a bit of photography but just with the normal digital cameras. I'm supposed to be taking some SR pictures and some sports type pictures. I've always wanted to get a DSLR camera but just haven't had the money. What are the best kinds for people looking to take more pro pictures, but I don't wanna pay a ton of money! Thanks :)

Answer
The Pentax listed below with a 50-200mm lens covers most anything you could desire in terms of pictures. I bought a Pentax K-x (now discontinued) without the 50-200mm lens and ended up paying more when I added the 50-200mm lens. The K-R is the current model., What influenced me to purchase this camera over Canon (I use to be a life long Canon user.) was the clean viewfinder with only one moveable focusing point, which I love. However more focusing points are available. Also I liked the idea that the stabilization is contained in the camera body. This makes older Pentax lenses, even many used for film cameras available to be used on this camera. Also makes Pentax lenses cheaper than those that contain stabilization in the lenses like Canon & Nikon.

Good Luck!



Pentax K-R 12.4 MP Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 and 50-200mm f/4-5.6 Lenses (Black)
by Pentax For about $700.00 at amazon.com

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What type of Camera should I get for nighttime photography?

dslr camera with twin lens kit image

WolvesNdaw

I'm very new to photography, but need a high-quality camera to document some historical sites and places. I'll likely be visiting a lot of places for nighttime photography. I'm very new to the field of photography and have no idea where to begin camera wise. I'd like not to spend too much if possible (< $400). Thanks!

Answer
The problem with nighttime photography is that you can't get high quality without a tripod or possibly a high-end dSLR (eg a Nikon D700, D3s). An appropriate dSLR is out of the question but even a decent tripod chews up a quarter of your budget. That doesn't leave much for a camera.

Option 1 - film:
$235 Mamiya C220 medium format camera: http://www.keh.com/camera/Mamiya-Twin-Lens-Reflex-Camera-Outfits/1/sku-MT019990520150?r=FE
$105 Gossen Luna light meter (good in low light): http://www.keh.com/camera/Light-Meters-Light-and-Exposure-Meters/1/sku-GM7099902273905?r=FE
$89 Bogen 3021 tripod + head: http://www.keh.com/camera/Tripods-Complete-Tripods/1/sku-TR419991172950?r=FE
$50 for film + generic cable release + batteries for the light meter.
$479 Total. And some practice to use the light meter.

Option 2 - digital:
$205 Canon Rebel XT dSLR: http://www.keh.com/camera/Canon-Digital-Camera-Bodies/1/sku-DC029991014550?r=FE
$84 50mm f/1.8: http://www.keh.com/camera/Canon-EOS-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-CE06009033699N?r=FE
$89 tripod as above.
$40 memory card + electronic remote shutter release.
$418 Total. And a whole lot of post processing to stitch images together (free software).

You could cut costs with a 35mm film camera if you don't require large prints, but even then I can't put together a kit with a quality wide angle lens for under $400. Not by any brand.

For more options, either lower your quality standard or increase your budget.

Beginner photographer trying to convince parents for a affordable DSLR camera?

Timothy K

I'm looking for a camera that can take really clear, great pictures without the big cost of many DSLR's. I'm only 16 and just recently fell in love with the magnificent world of photography. What camera do you think would suit a beginner with not such a high price? I was thinking on the lines of Nikon d40. How good of a camera is that? Anyone want to recommend a really affordable camera that takes amazing pictures?
thanks
Price range: $300-$550

Answer
Hi Well I just did lots of research for our first dslr so im happy to share my thoughts. We chose an Olympus E520 for the following reasons:

With the twin lens kit its amazing value for the money.
It has good build quality.
It has image Stabilization built into the body which keeps the lens costs down. Whereas Nikon have IS built into the lenses (more expensive).

I figure the single most important factor when learning is to take lots of photos. That means having a camera on you most of the time. The olympus is just about the smallest and lightest DSLR on the market.

It also has anti dust features, and "depth of field preview" which i think you will find the D40 doesnt.

Having said all that...the D40 would be an awesome camera...and definitely don't need more than 10 megapixels.

I prefer the Nikon build quality to Canon at the entry level.

The pentax K200d also seems like a very good entry level camera. Its just a bit heavy for my liking.

They will all allow you you to take amazing pictures...its 90% photographer and 10% camera.

good luck!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What type of camera should I be getting?

best type of camera lens for portraits image

Etnie

I'm really into photography and I have the money to buy a pretty nice camera. Nothing like 2,000 dollars or anything, but I want to know what type of camera would be good with taking action shots like skateboarding or alot of movement, but also takes really nice portrait pictures too. Help please! :)

Answer
Get yourself a 35 mm, SLR (Single Lens Reflex) film camera.
A Canon EOS Rebel will do what you want for about $400.00 and it is both automatic as well as manual.
For the sports shots you want; you have to get a fast film, and preferably a fast lens, (about another $400.00) but the lens that does come with the camera should do the job you want quite adequatly.
Use an film speed with an ISO of 800 and for dusk scenes an ISO of 1600 should do. The 800 ISO can be purchased in many stores, but the 1600 ISO has to be bought from a camera shop. But not one that is a franchise like Blacks or Wal Mart. The independant camera stores will be more likely to stock those fast films.
You can get a 3200 ISO film as well but it only comes in black and white and I think that only Kodak makes it.(it's a really fast film, you can take night scenes with that one!)
The 800 & 1600 ISO film can be bought in colour film and I would suggest Fujicolour for colour film but Kodak for all your black and white films.
For your portraiture photos use a slow speed film of 100 or 200 ISO.
You can get as low as 24 ISO in black and white film and that gives you an extreme amount of detail. However the lower your ISO the more light you will need to use it! Okay?
The higher your ISO the less light you will need.
The higher the film speed the more grainy your negatives will be, hence you will have grainier photos than a film speed of 100 ISO.
The Canon EOS is the most common SLR the students of photography buy. It's a good strong camera and it does take good photos. It can be geared to work with a fast film to take action photos like the skateboarders you want to catch.
All the best to you in your endeavours.
EDIT: A lot of the youth today go with the digital cameras but I would caution against that. Although film looks like it is going out of style I can assure you that it will be around for a very long time. Digital cannot compare with a film speed of 800 or 400 ISO and it will be decades before they produce a digital camera that can come close to the quality of an 400 ISO film. Although the digitals give you immediate gratification it loses out in quality. Film may be more expensive in the short run but in the long run? It is the best choice.

What type of Camera do professional photographers use?

Hope

What type of cameras do they use to take pictures for magazines?

Answer
Professional photographers use different cameras depending on what the images are going to be used for.
Magazines publish editorial pieces, landscapes and scenes, portraits, models, fashion, news items, travel photos, adversing and architectural photos - and that is just the GENERAL magazines.

In general, studio photos are set up using medium format cameras, and so are many architectural photos. Some pros prefer large format cameras, too. These are film and , increasingly, digital cameras producing very large extremely detailed images. They are expensive - a recently released digital medium format camera is about $10,000 with one lens, but that is the cheapest- until theis camera came along, you needed $30,000 to buy one, and most are much more. These cameras lend themselves to careful, methodical work; they are no use to the paparazzi and sports photographers.

The staff photographer on a magazine or newspaper is generally equipped with a full frame digital single lens reflex. Two brands dominate -Canon and Nikon, and the arguments about the relative merits of each are endless. These cameras cost between $3000 and $9000 depending on model. They are versatile, high performance tools and you will see them at sporting events and fashion shows, weddings, news events.... they are the workhorses of photography. The huge investment that their owners have in lenses and accessories means that photographers and the companies that employ them, do not change brands just because a "better camera" comes along.

Many magazines do not employ or even hire photographers. Nor do they buy from freelancers. They get their photographs from Image Libraries (stock photos). The biggest and most respected of these stock libraries list the cameras from which they will accept images. The last list I have seen from Getty's is certainly out of date, since at several; of the cameras on it have been superseded and there are many more highly specified cameras in the marketplace, but it gives you an idea of what is acceptable:

" Canon EOS: 1D(Mk1,2&3), 1DS(Mk1,2,2n&3) 5D, 30D and 40D; Nikon: D2X, D2Xs, D3, D200, D300 and the Leica M8. All medium format backs (e.g. backs by Phase One and Leaf etc) produce sufficiently high quality images to be accepted by us." That was in 2007, and there doesn't seem to be an updated list on their site, although in 2009 they announced that they would accept images from a compact camera for the first time - the Leica M9.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Which of these cameras is best?

nikon d3200 dslr camera 2 lens bundle image

AnkA

I know nothing of cameras. I need a camera for high resolution, something that can record videos (with good sound), and it needs zoom that is decent. I have about $1500. I need the answer fast because Costco is having some rebates before this Saturday. Some of my friends have the Canon T3i and the pictures come out really high resolution. That's what I really want. Is there a huge difference between 24 and 18? Which of these is the best?

Canon:
http://www.costco.com/Canon-Rebel-T3i-DSLR-Camera-2-Lens-Bundle.product.11760020.html

http://www.costco.com/Canon-T4i-DSLR-Camera-2-Lens-Bundle.product.100025018.html

http://www.costco.com/Canon-EOS-60D-DSLR-Camera-with-18-200mm-Lens-Bundle.product.11680756.html

http://www.costco.com/Canon-EOS-7D-DSLR-Camera-with-28-135mm-Lens-Bundle.product.100014084.html

Nikon:
http://www.costco.com/Nikon-D600-Full-Frame-DSLR-Camera-2-Lens-Bundle.product.100012382.html

http://www.costco.com/Nikon-D3200-DSLR-Camera-2-Lens-Bundle.product.100007777.html

Answer
Best is subjective.
Check out the functions and features of each and buy the one that ticks the most boxes.

"Zoom" is a function of the lens(es) not the camera. Lenses are available for DSLRs from 6mm to 1200mm focal length giving a zoom of 200x - just not in the same lens!

Without wishing to be too condescending, because of the way you have asked the question I would recommend the Nikon D3200 or Canon T4i. Use the rest of your budget to buy additional lenses after you have had the camera for a month or 2 and worked out which extra lens(es) are best for your particular useage pattern.

Nikon d5200 vs Nikon d3200?

Jake

I am a 14 year old beginner photographer looking for a new DSLR. I've been looking at lots of them, but I narrowed it down to two. The Nikon d5200 and the Nikon d3200. My budget is about $1000 (I can go a little over) and I want to get it with two starter lenses from Costco. Can y'all look at the links and give me some input? Thanks (:

Nikon d5200- http://www.costco.com/Nikon-D5200-DSLR-Camera-2-Lens-Bundle.product.100032348.html?MobileOptOut=1
Nikon d3200- http://www.costco.com/Nikon-D3200-DSLR-Camera-2-Lens-Bundle.product.100007777.html?MobileOptOut=1

Also find me on instagram @hi_im_jake!

Answer
The difference it that the D5200 has an articulated LCD

Go back to Costco and look closely at each camera and see which of them you like.

Both cameras perform very well.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What DSLR and lenses to get for outdoor shooting?

best camera lens for event photography image

Aiste

I am planning on getting a DSLR camera. I tried my hands on Canon 400D and 600D. However I found it rather difficult to get good pictures during the darker days and sporting events as my friend had only the basic lens. So after doing some reading I am still not sure what kind of camera/lens combination would work best for me. I was considering Canon 60D, Canon 700D or even Sony alpha 77. Also I am not too sure what lenses are available to all those models that would suit my needs. I am willing to pay a little bit extra for something that would last me a bit longer and let me develop as a photographer. Also it doesn't have to be the models I mentioned. I just want to know what are the best options. Thank you.

Answer
Your best option is to learn something about DSLR cameras and find some study aids to help with your decision. We all recommend that you handle each camera you are interested in, sight thru it, make believe you are shooting with it. Funny you do not mention looking at the Pentax K30 or even the K50, both super excellent cameras and a pleasure to handle. I switched from a life long love affair with Canon film cameras to Pentax a few years back and have not regretted my decision at all. The Pentax "fits" me better than the Canon. This is my personal decision! What will be your decision or will you just take the word of contirbutors? In regard to lenses the smartest thing is to purchase the camera with the 18-55mm lens. I prefer it when they offer a kit price and include the 50-200mm lens. This saves $50 over purchasing separately! Something to be considered. From there your lens choice is up to you and nobody else. You buy the lens that will do the job you need it to do.. For me I found that todays digital cameras don't come with a lens that enables one to get as close to copy say a 5x7 print like the "film" lenses of "yesterday". So I reasoned that I needed a macro lens. All lens are suitable for outdoor shooting. The fact is that not all lenses are suitable for INDOOR shooting unless you use a flash. But using a lens that is more sensitive to light(has a faster light gathering lens opening) is desireable for indoor available light photography. So say you want a 50mm lens and the lens is available with a lens opening of f/1.8 and also a lens opening of f/1.4. The lens that lets in the most light or is the "fastest" is the f`1.4. Now you will find the lens prices go up quite a bit as the lens speed is increased. I also recommend you purchase a few books written by Scot Kelby, his books are well written and you have access for a limited time to his web site with examples of what he is explaning in the book. Also any night school courses are an excellent source for learning ths craft.

Good Luck!

What does the vibration reduction actually do on a Camera lens?

Yvette T

Title says it all.

Do I really need it? I only plan on shooting at air-soft events/ Nitro rc racing courses and common photography.

Answer
If you're shooting from a tripod or monopod, are using flash or have learned from experience the professional way to handle an SLR, then you probably don't need VR. I turn my VR off when using a monopod but I keep it on the rest of the time.

It's a feature that DOES let you capture images that might otherwise be ruined by camera movement.

Look at the last two images on this webpage. Just move your mouse over the images and you'll be amazed at the difference.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/image-stabilization.htm

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is the difference between these two cameras?

d5000 dslr camera with 18-55mm lens - black image

Bob L

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Nikon+-+12.3-Megapixel+D5000+DSLR+Camera+with+18-55mm+Lens+-+Black/9311755.p?id=1218082646627&skuId=9311755

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Nikon+D5000DX+12.3MP+Digital+SLR+Camera+with+Extra+55-200mm+Zoom+Lens/9999156300050015.p?id=pcmprd156200050015&skuId=9999156300050015

I'm really hoping to go with the 600$ one LOL. and do i need any other accessory with this camera? THANKS

Answer
The cameras are the same. The lenses are different.

Get the one with 18-55mm it is a fine starter lens to teach you all of the available options your camera allows.

I need a digital DSLR camera!:) Do you know of any reasonably-priced, really good ones?

Thanks sooo much!:)

Answer
The Pentax K-x performs better than any other camera in its price range and as well or better than some more expensive models (test comparisons below). Check prices from B&H in USD then see test comparisons below

Pentax K-x w/18-55 $521 HD video
Pentax K-x w/18-55 and 50-200 $625 HD video
Pentax K-x w/18-55mm and 55-300mm $715 HD video
Nikon D5000 w/18-55 $700 HD video
Rebel XSi (450D) w/18-55 $560 No video
Nikon D3000 w/18-55 $550 No video
Canon T2i w/18-55 $900 HD video
Canon 7D body only $1700 HD video
Canon 50D body only $930 No video

With the K-x Image Stabilization and Auto-focus are both in the body. No need to pay for IS or AF with each and every lens you buy as with Nikon and Canon. This will save you significant cash throughout the years you own the camera.

http://www.pentaximaging.com/slr/K-x_Black/

See performance comparisons for the Canon 1000D, Nikon D3000 and Pentax K-x here
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/268|0/(appareil2)/331|0/(appareil3)/345|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Canon/(brand2)/Nikon/(brand3)/Pentax

Performance between the K-x and Nikon D5000 is very close as shown in this comparison
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/320|0/(appareil2)/345|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Nikon/(brand2)/Pentax

The K-x outperforms the Canon T2i and Canon 50D See the comparison here
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/345|0/(appareil2)/338|0/(appareil3)/267|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Pentax/(brand2)/Canon/(brand3)/Canon

And the K-x outperforms the Canon 7D here with just a hair advantage to the 7D at high ISO
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/345|0/(appareil2)/329|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Pentax/(brand2)/Canon

The Pentax K-x is a beginner friendly camera.

ImagingResource
âThe Pentax Kx has enormous value, thanks to its remarkable image and print quality, fine build, and class-leading burst speed, all combining to make one impressive digital SLR camera. The Pentax Kx is a Daveâs Pick. For sheer image quality at a wide range of ISOs, the Pentax Kx is tough to beat, especially for the price.â

DCResource
âThe Pentax K-x is an impressive entry-level digital SLR. It brings very good image quality (especially with a decent lens), snappy performance, tons of features, HD movie recording, and good build quality to the table. If youâre looking for your first digital SLR, then the K-x should be high on your list.â

MacWorld.uk (Editorâs Choice)
âUltimately, this is a beginner-friendly model featuring most of the latest must-havesâ
http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/pentax-k-x-reviews-sample-photos/

Its true there are more Nikon and Canon lenses available. Check the prices. Can you afford all the lenses available? If you can do you plan on buying each and every one? There are more than enough Pentax and third party lenses available for any photographer.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What digital camera is the best at picking up details for black and white photography?

best canon lens under 600 image

xblackxspa

I have an Olympus C-4000 and It takes good photos but doesn't get the details I want. I'm hoping to find a camera under $600. I want something that picks up lots of details from far away and up close. I take a lot of nature photos and I'm starting to try portraits.

Answer
Not sure exactly what you mean by 'details'.

A Hasselblad H3D is going to give you the best tonality for Black & White conversions. The Nikon D700 or Canon 5D Mark II would be adequate. I have not seen an APS-C camera that can really do B&W well.


"I want something that picks up lots of details from far away and up close."

If you are talking about physical details then you might look into prime macro lenses and telephoto lenses.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/lens/dea/products/lens/300_28/index.asp

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/lens/dea/products/lens/50_20M/index.asp

***

If you are truly serious about B&W you should look into a Mamiya RZ67 and Ilford Pan F, Tri-X or XP2. Film is still best for B&W imagery.

What is the best 35mm digital camera that will hold an wide angel lens priced under $600?

Mark's Min

Hi,

I need a 35 mm digital camera that I can attach a wide angel lens too. Obviously, I would also buy a separate compatible wide a angel lens. I would like at least 10 mega pixel and would like a camera. I can only spend $600 which includes any taxes.. Any ideas?

Answer
any of the modern digital SLR's (dSLR's) will be suitable

but there are few if any 35mm dSLR's in your budget, AFAIK only top end dSLR's like the Canon EOS..but they cost multi thousands

it comes down to what you call a wide angle lens. moder dSLR's tend to use smaller sensors than 35mm film format.. hence they have a so called 35mm equivalent.. for most thats around 1.25 to 1.5 times 35mm, for four thirds cameras (Olympus & Panasonic) this factor is twice. so they may produc e a lens which optically is 14-50mm zoom is quoted at 28-100mm equivalent for Olympus, or 32-75mm at 1.5 times

so having said that any dSLR with a suitable lens will do the job. despite what some people say I don't think there is as big a difference between the makes as people say. so go to a camera shop and make your own mind up as to which camera you like. theres is an argument that buying a Canon or Nikon on the basis that you may be able to get cheaper lenses secondhand on EBAY or similar, and that mey be true. Its also true that Nikon Canon and others built dSLR's that could use a photographers exisitng lenses.., anoither of the rreasons given why Cznonor Nikon may be better/// I'd argue the Olympus approach of starting from scratch desiging lenses for the digital requirements a smarter approach.. fourthirds lenses tend to be smaller and lighter.

An alternative approach would be to find a suitable lens and then buy the best camera body you want (remembering to allow for things like memory cards, protective filter, camera gadget bag, card reader etc....)

there is a steep learning curve to get the best out of the camera

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What macro lens for a decent price should I get for my Canon XS?

dslr camera lens buying guide image

I have a Canon XS DSLR camera. I have 500 dollars, and I would like to purchase a macro lens for a decent price that isn't too much. Also, I would like to know a dependable website where I can purchase one if you can list one. Thank ;)

Answer
Hi,

For $500 you can either get 60mm f/2.8 Macro or 100mm f/2.8 USM, the best macro lens out there for Canons for the price. Buy it from Amazon, the cheapest and best.

Here's a Macro Lens Buying Guide - http://www.the-dslr-photographer.com/2010/02/buying-a-macro-lens-canon/

What is everything i need to begin wildlife photography?

John

I want to buy a Dslr Camera and have been researching photography for weeks now. Everything is so expensive even some tripods are more expensive than cameras ? That's Crazy ! My budget is $2200 For everything. Camera, lens, tripod, filters, etc.
Cool Story Bro. go back to tumblr you troll -_-
THE QUESTION IS WHAT IS EVERYTHING I WILL NEED. WHAT DSLR IS RECOMMENDED OR LENS AND WHAT NOT.

Answer
Okay, you have the right camera picked out, a dSLR

Now we have to outfit you with some lenses for shooting wildlife.

The two camera companies with the best array of lenses are the Nikon and Canon companies

At a minimum you will need something like a 18-200 mm lens to shoot wildlife that have a small "scare radius" and that you can find during the middle of the day in full sun. There are a couple of other possibilities, the 55-300 mm or 70-300 mm lens. All of these lenses have an aperture of f/5.6 when at their longest focal lengths These three lenses are perhaps the most economical of the long zoom lenses

When shooting wildlife at dawn or dusk, you will need a much faster lens and/or a dSLR which has excellent sensor performance at high ISO settings.

List of lenses I used when shooting wildlife:

* 300 mm f/2.8
* 400 mm f/2.8
* 200-400 mm f/4
* 600 mm f/4

If you use a dSLR with a cropped sensor, the above lenses will give you a 1.5x extra reach.

You can run the numbers, but what is going to kill your budget is the cost of the long, prime lenses.

Happily, the same lenses are also the ones used when shooting sports, so they have some extra value.

Here is a link you may like to view.

http://www.georgelepp.com/

Don't forget a nice sturdy tripod and maybe a spotting scope. Oh and maybe most of all some excellent bug repellent

I used a Nikon D2X with those lenses when I had a call for wildlife images. Now I would use my D3 or D300

Another resource:

http://www.cameralabs.com/lenses/lens_buyers_guide/Nikon_Nikkor_lenses/Which_telephoto_lens/Which_Nikkor_Nikon_sports_action_telephoto_lens.shtml

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

DSLR - What company (Nikon, Canon, etc.) is the best quality for a photography camera?

d5000 dslr camera with 18-55mm lens - black image

ashleyoliv

I've been interested in photography for quite a while. But I haven't gotten around to buying a professional camera. I have a digital camera that I've used that is very poor quality. I usually use my phone camera. DSLRs (photography cameras) are extremely costly and expensive.

I need a company that is best quality.
I need a place to buy them for lower prices.

Thank youuu!(:
<3

Answer
Pros use Nikon and Canon for a variety of reasons but they donât use Nikon or Canon consumer DSLRs. Pros can justify the expense of Nikon and Canon specialty lenses where the average consumer cant. Pros make money from the expensive equipment they buy but the average consumer doesnât. Just because pros use a particular brand doesnât mean its better for the average user. Nikon and Canon took hold because of aggressive marketing in which other manufacturers chose not to participate. It doesnât mean there are no other high quality DSLRs available.

If youre shopping for lower prices chances are youre not purchasing a pro camera. A pro camera will run around $2000 minimum.

If you want very high quality images without the added cost of the Nikon and Canon names go for the Pentax K-x. In tests it performs better than the Nikon D3000 and about equal to the D5000. See the comparison
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/331|0/(appareil2)/320|0/(appareil3)/345|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Nikon/(brand2)/Nikon/(brand3)/Pentax

The K-x performs better than both the Canon XS and Xsi. See comparison here
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/268|0/(appareil2)/185|0/(appareil3)/345|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Canon/(brand2)/Canon/(brand3)/Pentax

The K-x outperforms the Canon T2i and Canon 50D See the comparison here
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/345|0/(appareil2)/338|0/(appareil3)/267|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Pentax/(brand2)/Canon/(brand3)/Canon

And the K-x outperforms the Canon 7D here with just a hair advantage to the 7D at high ISO
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/345|0/(appareil2)/329|0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Pentax/(brand2)/Canon

Go to this link and compare the K-x to Canon and Nikon. It outperforms any of their cameras in its price range and better than or equal to some of their more expensive models. Use âCompare Camerasâ
http://www.dxomark.com/

The K-x has Image Stabilization and Auto Focus in the body. These are in the lenses with Nikon. AF is in lenses with Canon. Why pay for IS and AF over and over with each lens you buy? Having IS and AF in the body will save money on lenses for as long as you have the camera. The K-x also has HD video for the price of cameras with no video at all.

Here are price comparisons in your range from B&H Photo except as noted

Pentax K-x w/18-55 $521 HD video
Pentax K-x w/18-55 and 50-200 $625 HD video
Pentax K-x w/18-55mm and 55-300mm $715 HD video
Nikon D3000 w/18-55 $550 No video
Nikon D5000 w/18-55 $700 HD video
Rebel XS (1000D) w/18-55 $530 No video
Rebel XSi (450D) w/18-55 $560 No video

Full specs and features for the K-x here
http://www.pentaximaging.com/slr/K-x_Black/

ImagingResource
âThe Pentax Kx has enormous value, thanks to its remarkable image and print quality, fine build, and class-leading burst speed, all combining to make one impressive digital SLR camera. The Pentax Kx is a Daveâs Pick. For sheer image quality at a wide range of ISOs, the Pentax Kx is tough to beat, especially for the price.â

DCResource
âThe Pentax K-x is an impressive entry-level digital SLR. It brings very good image quality (especially with a decent lens), snappy performance, tons of features, HD movie recording, and good build quality to the table. If youâre looking for your first digital SLR, then the K-x should be high on your list.â

MacWorld.uk (Editorâs Choice)
âUltimately, this is a beginner-friendly model featuring most of the latest must-havesâ
http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/pentax-k-x-reviews-sample-photos/

Some will argue there are more Nikon and Canon lenses available. Its true. Check the prices. Can you afford all the lenses available? If you can do you plan on buying each and every one? There are more than enough Pentax and third party lenses available for any photographer.

What do you think is the best photography camera to use for modeling?

cory c

Answer
What you want is a DSLR camera, you will gain in quality mainly because a DSLR has a bigger sensor than a point and shoot camera. In regards to lens, which is very important, a short zoom is good to start with and later you can add any other lenses that you discover help fit your needs.

There are a number of good brands so don't be sold on the idea one brand is better than another. I would keep your costs down. I would get a DSLR with a short zoom (like a 18-55mm) to start for around $425 to $650. Either a 10MP or 12MP will do just fine.

Below, I listed some links where you can look up reviews and see what camera works best for you. Also I included some links to some dealers so that you can try and get the best price. Some of these dealers have some of these cameras with some nice extras, free shipping is very common, and sometimes they are offering a free memory card and/or camera bag. Sometimes you have to click in the âadd to cartâ button to see the actual price.

Here are some models that I think are well worth researching:

Sony Alpha A230 Digital SLR 10 MP with 18-55mm Lens - $429

Nikon D3000 10MP DSLR Digital Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - $449
Nikon D5000 12MP DSLR Digital Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - $50

EOS Rebel XS 10MP DSLR Digital Camera Kit (Black) with 18-55mm IS Lens - $449
EOS Rebel XSi 12MP DSLR Digital Camera Kit (Black) with 18-55mm IS Lens - $565

Pentax K-x 12MP DSLR with 18-55mm Zoom (has HD Video also) - $550

Hope this helps. Good luck.

Mark

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

what kind of camera would you recommend for fashion?

best type of camera lens image

Geo

What type of cameras,lens do photographers use for these professions?
.Editorial
.Portrait

my budget would be around 500-1,000.
Im looking for a camera that has the body & lens together

Answer
Just so you know, you're not getting any answers, because of your budget. Sorry, but photographers doing that kind of work use camera body's ranging from 5K to 50K, and that doesn't include lens's!

You might have a look at a Canon Rebel, or a Nikon D60 kit, fine to start out on.

is there something i can put around my camera lens to get toddlers attention?

Justin

I have heard of this circular toy type thing that goes around the tips of a camera lens to get kids attention to look at the camera. Anyone know what those are called and where i can get them form.

Answer
Just use a squeaky toy ... like we used with animals

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What kind of dslr camera should I buy?

canon eos 600d dslr camera lens kit image

Kenjii_Won

I want to buy a DSLR camera. It would be my first ever DSLR camera. But I'm not sure what model should I buy. My budget is around Rm1800 to Rm2100. I'm going to use this camera on street photography and might take landscapes pictures. Please help me!!

Answer
For a budget like that I'd recommend a Canon EOS 550D/600D (but not the much more expensive 650D) or a Nikon D5100 or D3200 (Canon or Nikon are the best at these prices).
If you want to remain at this price, you may buy the camera with the kit lens (18-55mm) which enables you to take landscapes and if you have some money left or to spend more (not too much, about a hundred dollars) you may buy a 50mm f/1.8 lens (can be found at both manufacturers), a cheap lens with large aperture so that you can achieve great bokeh in street photography.
However, even when you don't have much budget (as I was when I bought mine) I would NOT choose the cheapest DSLR, i.e. Canon EOS 1100D or Nikon D3100...

Should I go with the Canon t3i with 18-55mm lens or t4i with 18-135mm IS STM?

Canon EOS Rebel T4i 18MP DSLR Camera With 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Lens Kit

or

Canon Rebel T3i 18MP DSLR Camera With 18-55mm IS Lens Kit

$799 for the t4i and $550 for the t3i

I read that the lens for the t4i is $400-$500 alone so I was thinking that if the t4i package is a good deal I might just buy that instead of the t3i that I was originally planning on buying

Answer
What are your goals?

The T4i/650D and lens is designed primarily for those who want to use a still camera as a video camera.

Sensor wise, the T3i/600D potentially provides the same quality images if you have the skills

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What to do in New York City in February 2013?

best camera lens for helicopter tour image

Leah

I am an 18 year old girl who will be going to New York City for the third time in February 2013. I will be taking my friend who has never been there before. She does not want to do the generic Statue of Liberty and Trump Tower New York experience, and neither do I. What are some great places to visit/things to do to really get in the New York spirit? I'm a huge fan of fashion and she's a huge fan of adventure! I really want this trip to be an amazing one, but I don't want to take her to the exact same places I've already been. She's not the only one that wants to have a great trip! Please list any and all ideas and I'll just ignore the ones that I've already been to. Thank you so much!

Answer
Fashion Week in winter 2013 is supposed to be held February 7-14. If you miss Fashion Week then you should at least see the Fashion Center Kiosk and "Garment Worker" at the corner of 39th and 7th in the Garment District. The Fashion Walk of Fame is there along 7th Avenue also. For shopping, meanwhile, I suppose you could go to Soho or to one of the Century 21 stores, like the one across from the World Trade Center.

For adventure, I dunno, you could try mountain biking in Highbridge Park; or regular biking, scooting or skateboarding across the bike paths of the Queensboro, Williamsburg and Manhattan Bridges; or skateboarding at one of several skate parks in NYC; or a 15-min. helicopter ride for about $150 per person; or the Roosevelt Island Tram above the Upper East Side for a little above $2 per trip. Meanwhile, I keep seeing these party boats on the rivers around Manhattan; they probably cost a bundle, but a cheaper option would be the Circle Line tour boat, plus I see that the Gray Line has now gotten involved in that sort of business.

More adventurous options would involve travel to places most tourists don't visit. For instance, if you take the J train way out to Cypress Hills you will survive; once you get there, there are interesting cemeteries in the area, including Cypress Hills National Cemetery (like the one in Arlington), Cypress Hills (Private) Cemetery, and Machpelah Cemetery further north up in Queens where Harry Houdini is buried right in front of the entrance. Calvary Cemetery off Laurel Hill Blvd in Queens is also very interesting, but I'm not sure how you get there by public transportation; Google Maps would know though. Bear in mind that these cemeteries are fancy and like ones you'd see in New Orleans.

Meanwhile, you could also take the R train way out to 95 St-Bay Ridge in Brooklyn to see the Verrazano Bridge up close; after that you could take the R train back up to 59 St, transfer to the Q train, and go to Coney Island. And if you find a way to reach Fort Tilden to see the remnants of the gun batteries out there, that'll definitely be different.

Finally, to get in the New York spirit I'm guessing you could stand in line at Shake Shack in Madison Square Park, get Indian or halal food from a street vendor, find some place to grab a bagel, stop at the first pizza place you find and grab a slice from there, take a subway train to areas where the tourist traps aren't (e.g. A train to 190 St toward the Cloisters), or go to Madison Square Garden. You should also go and observe all the hustle and bustle at busy areas like Wall St in the morning or afternoon, Grand Central Terminal, or Madison Ave looking north from 41st St (this is interesting if you have a camera with a good zoom lens).

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Lenses and depths of field on DSLR cameras?

dslr camera lenses explained image

Sabasaurus

I'm looking at a DSLR and I'm noticing the camera lenses. Can someone explain to me the differences in them? Does one particular lens only work for certain aperatures? Will a f/5.6 lens give me ONLY a shallow depth of field? Or will it give me any type of depth of field?

Hopefully I explained that right.

Thanks for any help.

Answer
Main lens information is focal legth and apperture.

If you see a lens with 70-200mm f2.8-5.6 it means that the lens focal legth only goes from 70 to 200.
Now the F numbers at the front represent the minimum amount of aperture you can get at that focal length. For instance at 70mm you can get anything from 2.8 nothing below. This means that you can get 2.8 3.5 4 5.6 onward. Not at 200mm you cannot get any f-number below 5.6.

Some lenses have fixed aperture. For instance : 70-200mm f2.8. This lens can keep the 2.8 all the way from 70-200mm

Then there are the fixed (or prime) lenses. These have both fixed. For instance, the classical 50mm f1.8. These lenses cannot zoom but provide the best looking pictures in therms of quality and, since they don't zoom, they can have really low numbers aperture with amazing depth of field.

As for the depth of field question, a lens that is f2.8 will give you any field from f2.8 onward.

How do I take good photos of sky lanterns?

rb

There's a sky lantern festival happening tomorrow night, and I really wanna take some good shots of the lanterns as they take into the sky. Does anyone have any good settings on a DSLR camera for shots like these? (I own a Canon 500D). Thanks!

Answer
I'd use my Nikon with it's 35-80 zoom lens set to 80, that the best camera I got right now but it's definitely not adequate.

I used to own a Pentax K-1000 with an assortment of lenses, still do but they're wore out and won't work anymore. Now if you got something similar to a Pentax system---try to do this.

Use ASA 1000 film as I assume you'll be shoot at night, 200 for day. Using a 75-260 zoom lens and bracing yourself against something solid like the roof of your car to avoid hand shake track the subject and shoot.

I recommend you use a flash attachment. The flash won't really carry more than 15 yards but it will reflect and expose an image behind it's principal source of light.

I use a flash to explain UFO's and often I get helicopters and F-117's and when I know what they are they ain't UFO's anymore.

Good luck and good shooting.

Hope you win a prize in "Popular Photography".

Powered by Yahoo! Answers