Saturday, April 12, 2014

What makes a DSLR camera good?




Euronymous


I would like to be a professional live concert photographer, and I'm looking for a nice DSLR camera, and I expect to buy a good lense for indoor live concert shooting.

I've been looking at all different cameras. Nikon D40, D60, D90, Canon XSI, and what I'm realizing is, it seems that what really makes the photographs great is the lense more then anything. All these camera bodies seem pretty much the same. So, my question is, should I buy a more affordable Nikon D40 or affordable Rebel, and spend the real money on the lenses?

Thank you so much for your help!



Answer
What makes a dSLR camera good?

The person using it.

Seriously - pretty much all of the dSLR cameras out there are really quite decent (all the current versions anyhow). Nikon, Canon, Sony, Pentax, Olympus - they all make good gear - they all make some decent (often excellent) lenses (but they also make some stinkers), and they all now have relatively large sensors.

The real magic lies with the person using the camera - do they have an eye for photography, do they know how to set up the camera to capture what they want to show in their pictures etc...Sadly - this is the area I struggle with most - but am working on. It is rarely the camera's fault. Now when I was shooting film - I could blame the camera on occasion since I had no way of previewing what I had shot - but with digital - it's largely up to the operator to get the best out of the shot.

You are right though - the lens is one of the most critical aspects of the total system. Put a sub-par lens on a Canon 5DMkII and you will get lousy pictures. But similarly, put the best lens on the most expensive and full featured camera and hand it to someone with no real photographic vision and you will end up with perfectly focused, very high resolution pictures of something completely uninteresting and uninspiring.

Can I interchange Canon lenses betw/ my DSLR and Film SLR camera?




PDXMom3


I have two Canon Rebel SLR cameras. One is digital (about 2 1/2 years old) and the other is about 4 years old and is a film camera. I just realized that my 28-80 lens from my film camera seems to fit on my digital SLR. Is it okay to put it on there? Is there a reason why I should or should not? Thank you for any advice.
I'm trying to select the best answer but something is wrong -it's not letting me?!?!?



Answer
You certainly can use the lenses from your film camera on your digital. As long as they are an EOS mount lens. All Canon cameras and lenses from 1987 on will be EOS mount.

You can not however use the EFs lens that came with your digital SLR on your film camera. It would cause vignetting and could damage the mirror on your film camera. The EFs lenses are specifically designed for the crop sensor DSLR's.

Typically most people will only have one or two EFs lenses though. The 18-55mm lens that comes with the camera and maybe a 10-22mm wide angle lens. Most other lenses will be the EF lenses and will work on both film and digital.

Bottom line is you can use all EOS lenses on your digital both EF and EFs. On your film you can only use the EF lenses.

Hope this explains everything for you.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Help with finding the right dslr camera lens?




Jackie


I'm looking into buying my first dslr camera but I'm kind of confused on what kind of lens to get. I'm looking for something with a really good zoom and I know for a point and shoot camera I'd want something that is over a 20x Zoom so what would this equal to for a dslr lens? I hope this makes sense, I don't know much about dslr cameras.


Answer
The most common kit lens is 18-55mm
which translates to 55/18 = 3.05x zoom

Nikon makes a 18-300mm, which translates to 16.67x zoom
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/18-300mm.htm

A 300mm fixed focus lens means 0x zoom
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/3004af.htm

You are looking at proper DSLR's & they dont operate the same way as point & shoots

Which lens should I buy for my first DSLR camera?

Q. I am going to buy my very first DSLR camera in a few months. It's probably going to be a Nikon D90 or D7000. Problem is, I absolutely have no idea about lenses! I would really appreciate it if you can help me out a bit.


Answer
Normally the standard lenses that come with the cameras are good for beginners.
My Dad brought his first DSLR a few years back and the standard lens has seen more use than both the wide-angle and telephoto lens he purchased too.
My ex also brought a D90 last year and has only ever used the standard lens, which is quite decent.

A 'Nifty-fifty' (a 50mm fixed focal lens) is often brought by beginners, you can get use to taking photographs without relying on the zoom on the lens. These can start reasonably cheaply, and go way into the hundreds for a good one with a low f. stop.

Depending on what you want to do with your camera a wide-angle lens can be useful, there are several companies that make lenses designed to fit to Nikons and Canons, and are often much cheaper than the manufacturers own lenses (though, they may not be as to such a high quality)

Telephoto zoom lenses are good if you are interested in wildlife photography, or photography in which you are going to be a long distance from the subject. However, for a decent one of these you are looking at several hundred pounds, going into the thousands if you require a top - end one.

I would suggest sticking to the basic camera lens at the beginning and see how your photographs turn out. If you realise you like taking more wide-angle shots, then perhaps try a wide-angle lens, and vice-versa for the telephoto.

There are lots of different lenses out there, so I'm sure you'll have lots of fun!!

There are also places where you can hire camera equipment, so it can sometimes to 'try before you buy'. If you borrow a lens for a weekend, and decide you don't like it, it is much cheaper than buying a new lens and then realising.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Will this lens fit my Canon eos 1000D?







http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110419408854

This is the lens I want to buy, but I'm not sure if it'll fit my camera without an adapter.



Answer
Your camera has a Canon EOS mount, which is what this lens is made for. Yes, it will fit.

Does the Canon 100mm Macro lens fit a Canon 1000D?




Pitcher


Hello

I'm looking at buying a Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L IS USM Macro Lens
and I was wondering if it will even fit my cameras.

I have a Canon 1000D which I am most concerned about - will the lens fit?!
Also have a Canon 7D - I presume it would fit that as it is a newer model and they say a lot of lens fit it.

Thanks heaps, !
Awesome - thanks heaps!



Answer
Yes, it specifies in the lens name that it is an EF mount. Your 1000D and 7D will accept all lenses with an EF and EF-S mount.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Friday, April 11, 2014

Best general purpose lens for the Canon 350D and Canon 400D?




abhijit b


I am planning to pickup the Canon 350D or Canon 400D. What is the best general purpose lens ? Is the EF-S 18-55mm kit lens fine? or is it better to go with say the Tamron 18-200mm Di-II?


Answer
I don't think that there is an easy answer here without knowing some more about what your interests are. The standard lens covers a useful range of wide-angle to normal and the shorter telephoto range, so it will always be a useful lens. It is likely to be less bulky than the 18-200mm, but you need to make the assessment yourself whether it will be too awkward for some circumstances.

That said, I use a Tamron 28-200mm on a film body when I want a one lens solution to cover a broad range of work when I am travelling. When I a home based, I tend to use a smaller lens, say a 35-70mm or 35-105mm on the camera, with a longer zoom (50-150mm or 70-210mm) in my camera bag.

So, if I were in a similar situation, and only going to get one lens, I would have a preference for the 18-200mm over the kit lens.

which fisheye lens would be good for my canon 350d?




jess b


im willing to spend around $1000
does sigma or one of them other brands make a fisheye that would fit the 350d then?



Answer
The only fisheye Canon makes at this time is one for their 35mm EOS and Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II and is the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens

I would look for one in the near future because of the popularity of the 350D and 400D cameras. It will be around 8.5mm or 9.0mm




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What lens should I buy for Canon 7D?




OCD


I recently bought a Canon 7D which I will be using to film, for portraiture and weddings, as well as some candid. I need help choosing a lens or lenses that will be great for these things and affordable.


Answer
Hi!
It really depends on your budget, however, judging by the kinds of photography you want to do, I would recommend a wide angle and a moderate telephoto lens.
Depending on what you like, primes (sharper and faster) or zooms (flexibility and comfort), you might have these choices (and others as well):
- primes: 35mm + 85mm, or 24mm + 50mm + 100/135mm
- zoom: 17-40 + 70-200 or 16-35 + 70-200 or 24-70
It really depends on your budget. For example, the 70-200 has 4 variations (f4 with and w/o IS, f2.8 the same way), and the cheapest one costs 1/4 of the most expensive one, but they definitely are highly recommended lenses... But never forget, that the best option is not always the priciest one! If you don't love bokeh or don't have shaky hands, then you don't have to spend thousands on IS... :)

If you're keen on primes, then I would suggest you the 3 Sigma lenses:
Sigma 35mm f1.4 DG HSM (even better performance than the Canon 35L ! )
Sigma 50mm f1.4 and Sigma 85mm f1.4 (better price-performance ratio and faster focus than Canon's L...)
If you want or can afford, Canon 100mm USM or 100L macro lenses work very well too. Both of them.
As long as you shoot group shot as well, never forget that 35mm on a crop body won't be enough...
And you might want to buy a TTL flash (Yongnuos work well and are cheap...) if you don't have one.

Edit: Oh, and I just noticed that you mentioned capturing movies... Then you definitely need IS. Without that... You cannot capture videos...

I hope I could help you a bit.
Bests,
Watt

A good lens for the Canon 7D?




hannabthem


Hey everyone! I do a lot of film work, but I'm new to Canon. I just recently bought the Canon 7D and the 50mm 1.8 lens as a starter. I was looking at getting the 18-135mm lens next, but does anyone have any good lens suggestions?

Thanks and Happy Easter!



Answer
For recording video, you should have bought an actual video camera/camcorder. The 18-135 is not a good lens for video. A 24-70, 17-55 or 24-105 would be.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Canon 20D Lenses?




dicko_1111


I own a canon 20D and am looking to purchase a zoom lens and/or a wide angle lens. I am a student and therefore don't have a lot of money to spend, so am just looking for the basics. I am eventually wanting to pursue photography as a profession and therefore I am after quality lenses.


Answer
Quality is a subjective term. The all around best lenses would be the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L and the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L because not only are these optically superior lenses, but the rugged construction makes the perfect for taking out on the sidelines to shoot a game or in the woods for wildlife.

Now, price can be an issue so optically, the Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 and the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 are awesome lenses with excellent optical quaility, but they are not nearly as rugged as the 24-70mm f/2.8L. The Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 is a great lens optically and competes well against the Canon but again it is not as rugged as the Canon L series.

Price: The Canon lenses will run around $2900.00 for the top of the line 70-200 with image stabilization. The Sigma combination will run around $1200.00 so you will have great optics that can last a liftime but you will need to be more careful with the equipment.

What would be a good all around lens to buy for a Canon 20D?




Collins





Answer
The Canon EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM

This lens has gotten fantastic reviews from Popular Photography.

http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/4768/lens-test-canon-28-135mm-f35-56-is-usm-af.html


Great zoom range.... and it's fairly fast for a zoom of this range.

And the price is right for a Canon IS!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

What zoom setting do I use on a Canon DSLR lens to equal 24x on a FujiFilm S3280 camera?




kfinpgh


I own a Fujifilm Finepix S3280 24x zoom camera and just got a Canon Rebel t3i DSLR camera. What are equivalent DSLR lens settings for the zoom factor on the Fujifilm camera? I have a couple of additional lenses for the DSLR, but want to compare "apples to apples". Thanks.


Answer
Once you left the P&S arena, you have got to buy different lenses to cover similar focal lengths to your S3280

The zoom lens with the most range would be the 18-200 mm lens (11x) in P&S terms.

I can use four lenses on my dSLR to produce the most focal lengths usually needed when shooting assignments

* 14-24 mm
* 24-70 mm
* 70-200 mm
* 200-400 mm

In P&S terms, those lenses equal about 28x

If you visit this site, you will see what it costs to purchase those four lenses.

http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Camera-Lenses/All-Lenses/index.page

When you went from owning a P&S to a dSLR system, you certainly jumped into the deep end of the photographic pool

Cheap Camera / Expensive Camera..how much difference?




Ty77


I'm thinking about buying my very first DSLR camera, which will be one of my first cameras. I own a Nikon L100 but it just isn't very reliable, it's a little sluggish and it doesn't take quick action shots...even on a bright day. Anyways I had my eye on the Canon Rebel XS (18-55mm lens) but I'm a bit confused on a few things. First of all the zoom is very short, and secondly, on the Canon website, this particular lens doesn't work well for objects closer then about 5 feet either. But on my Point&Shoot Nikon I can get fantastic macro photos + 15x zoom for distance shots...so why are DSLR lens so expensive? I've seen them go 2-3x the cost of the body itself...should I just stick with my L100 then for trips/vacations? And what are the extra benefits for a DSLR besides choosing your own aperture/shutter speed, etc...?


Answer
Here are two cameras side by side, the Canon XS (1000D) and Nikon D5000.

Here is how they stack up technically in the important factors.

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/(appareil1)/320%7C0/(appareil2)/268%7C0/(onglet)/0/(brand)/Nikon/(brand2)/Canon

And feature wise here:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=canon_eos1000d,nikon_d5000&show=all

Enjoy your new camera

You really cannot compare a P&S camera to a DSLR. One is like a row boat and the other like a motor-sailer

Yes, if you are satisfied with the quality you get from your L100, take it on vacations, but you will never get the quality from it you will from a much larger sensor like the DSLR's have.

Here is a shot taken using an old Nikon D100 while traveling.

http://s862.photobucket.com/albums/ab182/fotomanaz/Answers%20album/?action=view&current=iSVReality.jpg&newest=1




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Which DSLR camera should i choose ?




Deniza Al


Im an amateur in photography and i would like to buy my first DSLR and i've got about 600 euros to buy one. My friends say to choose from canon or nikon because they are one of the best but i really dont know what camera should I choose


Answer
I agree with Hernando. The Sony SLT A55 has Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology which allows for full-time continuous auto focus whether you're shooting still images or 1080p HD video. The A55 also has your choice of 2D or 3D Sweep Panorama as well as in-camera HDR plus a built-in GPS.

Here is a review:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA55/AA55A.HTM

A few more features of the A55 are its use of the legacy Minolta Maxxum "A" lens mount, a focusing motor in the camera body and Sony's version of Image Stabilization which is also in the camera body. This all means that you can add a Minolta Maxxum AF 70-210mm f4 zoom lens and it will auto focus on the A55 and be an IS lens for a fraction of the cost of a comparable Canon or Nikon lens. NOTE: The Maxxum AF 70-210mm zoom lens is a highly sought-after lens by Sony DSLR owners and is known as the "Beercan". You may have to search for one but its definitely worth the effort. On eBay you can pick one up for well under $200.00. A Canon EF 70-200mm f4 zoom (new) will set you back about $1,350.00. Nikon offers a 70-200mm f2.8 for a mere $2,249.00.

Additionally, you should keep in mind the fact that the entry-level Nikon DSLR cameras like the D3100, D5000 and D5100 all require using the more expensive AF-S lenses if you want auto focus.

So take serious look at the Sony SLT A55.

What DSLR camera would you recommend me to buy?




MiZz RuBy


I need a new camera but am lost on which one to get!
I have my eye on Nikon D3100 or Canon 550D- any other suggestions?
Thanks in advance!



Answer
My other suggestion would be to look at the Sony SLT A55. This DSLR has Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology which allows for full-time continuous auto focus whether you're shooting still pictures or 1080/60i HD video. No other DSLR allows this. The technology also allows shooting at 10fps (frames per second) which is the fastest in its price range.The Sony SLT A55 also gives you 2D or 3D Sweep Panorama in the camera as well as HDR in the camera. It also has built-in GPS.

Here are some reviews:

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA55/AA55A.HTM

http://www.digitalphotographywriter.com/2010/08/sony-slt-a55-review-translucent-mirror.html

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony-a55-preview.shtml

Current prices at B&H - http://www.bhphotovideo.com

Nikon D3100 w/18-55mm zoom, $649.95 after a $50.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Ends 7-30-2011.

Canon 550D/T2i w/18-55mm zoom, $749.95 after a $50.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Ends 7-9-2011.

Sony SLT A55 w/18-55mm zoom, $799.99 after a $50.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Ends 7-9-2011.

All 3 cameras have free USA shipping.

With its built-in focusing motor and Sony's version of Image Stabilization in the camera body and use of the legacy Minolta Maxxum "A" lens mount the SLT A55 can use the Legacy Minolta Maxxum AF lenses dating back to 1985 and they will auto focus and become, in effect, IS lenses.

The Nikon D3100 requires the more expensive Nikon AF-S lenses if you want them to auto focus.

Canon and Nikon have their respective versions of IS in some but not all of their lenses plus you pay for it over and over. A Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm f1.4 prime lens on the A55 will be an IS lens. Neither Nikon nor Canon offers an IS 50mm prime lens.

In my opinion the Sony SLT A55 offers technology and features that Nikon and Canon lack. Its only a matter of time before Canon and Nikon will have to respond by upgrading their technology to match that of the Sony A55.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Canon Rebel with better glass vs. 30D with standard lens?




angry


I recently won a scholarship and am considering bumping up some of my camera equipment. So far, I have this:

30D
28-104 f/3.5-4.5 USM
50mm f/1.8
70-300 f/4-5.6 (non-USM non-IS version)

I can spend about $1,000. So I'm considering either:

Selling what I have and getting a rebel with the Canon 17-55 f/2.8, the 75-300 IS USM, and a 50mm f/1.4.

Or, I can keep my current setup and just add the 17-55.

Any advice?



Answer
Hi,

Very interesting question!

I guess you are pretty camera savvy, and you will have researched the upgrade benefits of the XTi, and know the Canon US MTF curves for your lenses.

My question to you is "why do you want to change anything?"

Have you done some tests on focus, large aperture lens performance, high ISO and long exposure noise with your existing kit? If not - why not? The 28-104 (28-105?) f/3.5-4.5 USM is reckoned by some to be soft, so you might want to reconside that one as a walk around lens.

You should then be able to find the weak point(s) in your system.

Why do all your lenses overlap? You could get a decent wide angle prime to cover the c20mm range and a 100-300 for reach. You have a lot of duplicate kit here in your current system and it probably needs a rethink, based on what you want to shoot

The few extra pixels in the XTi are mostly irrelevant unless you want to print A2 and more, both bodies are Digic II - also irrelevant if you shoot RAW.

I can highly recommend the 50 f/1.4 lens, great value and solid performance.

You have a problem, and $1,000 to spend - not such a bad situation!

Cheers
Charles

Im buying the Canon 30d. Can you tell me what lens to buy. (link included)?




Motorcycle


Im going to buy the Canon 30d Ive grown my Nikon D3000 and want a more professional camera. Here is a link
http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/normal-range/canon-ef-s-15-85mm-f3.5-5.6-is-usm
That has lens's for rent....What lens would be good for portraits, senior pictures, Family pictures ect.
Thank you !



Answer
i personally prefer Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II Lens which helps you. it is really good.

*Approximately a 28-90mm lens in 35mm format.
*This lens produces high image quality with superb resolution at all focal lengths.
*Effectively minimizes the chance of flare and ghosting.
*Dimensions (DxL): 2.7" x 2.6" (69mm x 66mm)

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-18-55mm-3-5-5-6-II/dp/B000R96FP8/?tag=pntsa-20




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Telephoto lens for indoor sporting events...?







Can you recomend a good lens for capturing high-speed action in a gym? I have a film Canon Elan. I'd like pictures of high enough quality to hang on my wall, but I don't want to break the bank. It seems that lenses are either several thousands of dollars, or cheap junk. I'm not sure what exactly I'm looking for so any suggestion is welcome. I'm thinking, it would be ~f2.8 and >50mm. I don't know what a good length would be. The action will probably be about 30 - 50 feet from me, and I want the competitors to fill the frame. It needs to have an aperature large enough to compensate for gymnasium lighting.

Is there a good lens under $400 (better under $350) that will fit my Elan and produce great sports pictures?

Do I just need to be a better photographer???



Answer
The Elan 7E is a decent Canon EOS film SLR capable of handling any of the Canon EF lenses, but not the EF-s lenses made for "crop" dSLR cameras. For indoor sports photography, you're going to need fast film (ISO1600 at least) and fast lenses to get the required shutter speeds.

(A quick aside about shutter speeds: For capturing "action" shots where the subject will fill a reasonable amount of frame, you're going to need at least 1/500th of a second or faster shutter speed. If you have to do 1/400th, you'll see some motion blur, but that might be acceptable to you. Even at 1/500th, you'll relatively freeze the players, but any ball may show motion blur.)

For indoor sports (I'm assuming basketball, volleyball, maybe wrestling), you're going to want a fast focus and wide open (f/2.8 or better, with f/2 preferred) aperture. This means mostly prime lenses, except for expensive zooms.

A bunch of choices, in increasing focal length:

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (AKA "thrifty fifty") is a lightweight, inexpensive ($80!) lens that can really help out if you have a low budget. I own this lens, and it's nice to carry in a jacket pocket "just in case." However, it has a standard autofocus motor, so it's not all that fast of focus, but good enough for slow-paced action like free-throws or a volleyball serve. It's a bit short, but doable in a pinch. It's an all-plastic body and feels flimsy, so don't give it too hard of a time. Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM (AKA "nifty fifty") is a great lens with fast ultrasonic motor (USM) focusing and an all-metal body. Heavier than the f/1.8 above, it still suffers from a short focal length. You can get this for around $300 usually. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that you'd think would be great for indoor sports... except that it's not all that fast of a focus and not made for sports. For over $1000, I'm including it just for completion. Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM is a fantastic lens with fast USM focusing, a decent focal length (perfect for portraits, btw), with a nice, fast aperture. I know several professional photographers that shoot basketball (HS, college, and some NBA) with this lens on their main camera (HS, college) or backup (NBA). I own this lens, and it's on my camera 70% of the time for indoor soccer. It is, however, a bit too short for my soccer fields, and a longer lens is planned. You can get this for around $350 usually. Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM is another pro-series "L" that sounds great, but WAAAAY too slow to focus. At over $1200, you'd think it'd be good for sports, but alas, it's not. Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM is a fantastic lens, but is often either too short or too long. At $460, it's close to your budget, and may work out.
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that is reputed to be one of the best lenses ever made by Canon. For $900, it doesn't meet your budgetary requirements, but I would be amiss not mentioning this. If you want one of the best indoor sports lenses, this is on the short list. Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM is another pro-series "L" but more reasonable and a staple of indoor sports shooters. New, this lens is around $650, but attainable used for around $500. At f/2.8, it's a bit slower than the previous lenses, but doable. If you really like the 200mm focal length and really really REALLY want a faster lens, you can always attempt to find the... Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM lens, which has been out of production for years, and used lenses go for over $2500 last I checked. The price is simply supply and demand. There is a heavy demand (professional NBA photographers, gymnastics photographers, etc.) and not much supply. This is a dream lens for me, but I can't rationalize the purchase at this time. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM is a zoom lens that is reported to be one of the optically best zoom lenses in the history of Canon. At $1100, it's a bit out of range, but well worth looking at. If you have $600 more available, look at the IS version with Image Stabilization. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO HSM is Sigma's entry similar to the Canon zoom above. At $900, it's $200 cheaper and still a very nice lens. The images tend to run a bit cool, though, so you may need your lab to provide some slight color correction.
I recommend using your current zoom to figure out at what focal length you're more likely to need by just framing the shot and taking a note as to the focal length. I'm sure you'll see that you're often close to one of the prime lenses listed above.

I hope that's a good list for beginning. If you want to talk lenses more, drop me a private message.

As for buying lenses, take a look here (Amazon) which really is a portal for www.adorama.com, which is a very reputable camera store. Also, check out www.bhphotovideo.com which is another top-notch store with often the lowest prices around.

Telephoto lens for indoor sporting events...?




cerbberi


Can you recomend a good lens for capturing high-speed action in a gym? I have a film Canon Elan. I'd like pictures of high enough quality to hang on my wall, but I don't want to break the bank. It seems that lenses are either several thousands of dollars, or cheap junk. I'm not sure what exactly I'm looking for so any suggestion is welcome. I'm thinking, it would be ~f2.8 and >50mm. I don't know what a good length would be. The action will probably be about 30 - 50 feet from me, and I want the competitors to fill the frame. It needs to have an aperature large enough to compensate for gymnasium lighting.

Is there a good lens under $400 (better under $350) that will fit my Elan and produce great sports pictures?

Do I just need to be a better photographer???



Answer
The Elan 7E is a decent Canon EOS film SLR capable of handling any of the Canon EF lenses, but not the EF-s lenses made for "crop" dSLR cameras. For indoor sports photography, you're going to need fast film (ISO1600 at least) and fast lenses to get the required shutter speeds.

(A quick aside about shutter speeds: For capturing "action" shots where the subject will fill a reasonable amount of frame, you're going to need at least 1/500th of a second or faster shutter speed. If you have to do 1/400th, you'll see some motion blur, but that might be acceptable to you. Even at 1/500th, you'll relatively freeze the players, but any ball may show motion blur.)

For indoor sports (I'm assuming basketball, volleyball, maybe wrestling), you're going to want a fast focus and wide open (f/2.8 or better, with f/2 preferred) aperture. This means mostly prime lenses, except for expensive zooms.

A bunch of choices, in increasing focal length:

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (AKA "thrifty fifty") is a lightweight, inexpensive ($80!) lens that can really help out if you have a low budget. I own this lens, and it's nice to carry in a jacket pocket "just in case." However, it has a standard autofocus motor, so it's not all that fast of focus, but good enough for slow-paced action like free-throws or a volleyball serve. It's a bit short, but doable in a pinch. It's an all-plastic body and feels flimsy, so don't give it too hard of a time. Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM (AKA "nifty fifty") is a great lens with fast ultrasonic motor (USM) focusing and an all-metal body. Heavier than the f/1.8 above, it still suffers from a short focal length. You can get this for around $300 usually. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that you'd think would be great for indoor sports... except that it's not all that fast of a focus and not made for sports. For over $1000, I'm including it just for completion. Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM is a fantastic lens with fast USM focusing, a decent focal length (perfect for portraits, btw), with a nice, fast aperture. I know several professional photographers that shoot basketball (HS, college, and some NBA) with this lens on their main camera (HS, college) or backup (NBA). I own this lens, and it's on my camera 70% of the time for indoor soccer. It is, however, a bit too short for my soccer fields, and a longer lens is planned. You can get this for around $350 usually. Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM is another pro-series "L" that sounds great, but WAAAAY too slow to focus. At over $1200, you'd think it'd be good for sports, but alas, it's not. Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM is a fantastic lens, but is often either too short or too long. At $460, it's close to your budget, and may work out.
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that is reputed to be one of the best lenses ever made by Canon. For $900, it doesn't meet your budgetary requirements, but I would be amiss not mentioning this. If you want one of the best indoor sports lenses, this is on the short list. Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM is another pro-series "L" but more reasonable and a staple of indoor sports shooters. New, this lens is around $650, but attainable used for around $500. At f/2.8, it's a bit slower than the previous lenses, but doable. If you really like the 200mm focal length and really really REALLY want a faster lens, you can always attempt to find the... Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM lens, which has been out of production for years, and used lenses go for over $2500 last I checked. The price is simply supply and demand. There is a heavy demand (professional NBA photographers, gymnastics photographers, etc.) and not much supply. This is a dream lens for me, but I can't rationalize the purchase at this time. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM is a zoom lens that is reported to be one of the optically best zoom lenses in the history of Canon. At $1100, it's a bit out of range, but well worth looking at. If you have $600 more available, look at the IS version with Image Stabilization. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO HSM is Sigma's entry similar to the Canon zoom above. At $900, it's $200 cheaper and still a very nice lens. The images tend to run a bit cool, though, so you may need your lab to provide some slight color correction.
I recommend using your current zoom to figure out at what focal length you're more likely to need by just framing the shot and taking a note as to the focal length. I'm sure you'll see that you're often close to one of the prime lenses listed above.

I hope that's a good list for beginning. If you want to talk lenses more, drop me a private message.

As for buying lenses, take a look here (Amazon) which really is a portal for www.adorama.com, which is a very reputable camera store. Also, check out www.bhphotovideo.com which is another top-notch store with often the lowest prices around.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

DSLR Camera Lens Help? (NIKON)?




Mister


I am using Nikon D3100 with Lens 18-55mm VR. I want to buy a new lens I was thinking to go for 70-300mm VR.
Would it be a good decision or I should go for some other lens?
And what are sigma lenses?
Are they worth buying? Do they effect the image quality, focus, zoom etc as compared to the original lenses?



Answer
I have never felt Sigma had as good of quality as Nikon. Sure, there are exceptions, but anytime you go to the aftermarket, you are usually going with less quality.

Now, it may be a situation of measurable vs. noticeable, so you will have to judge that for yourself.

Here is a webpage showing the various focal lengths, and what you can expect from each lens:

http://www.althephoto.com/concepts/lenses.php

You can see that the 70-300 will have a significant improvement on your ability to bring in distant subjects.

should i get the Nikon 1 or an actual DSLR camera?




fairytaled


i want a camera because i've lately had a deep interest in photography, but i don't know what to buy.the new nikon 1 is really cool, because it has the same power as one of the larger cameras, but with a more compact design. but at the same time, the larger cameras have a more professional look to them and they make it easier to take close up shots. but next year i'm taking a photography class, and the typical camera that people use are DSLR's. do you think the nikon should pass as one? or tell me if you think it'd be worth it to get both.
thanks!:)



Answer
It is one thing to have several large DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) camera manufacturers, but each manufacturer creates several different models as well as a variety of compatible lenses. So when we choose the right DSLR digital camera it will come complete with a fully removable and interchangeable lens. But how do you know which camera is the right one for you in the first place.

Have you ever thought about it like this? Once you feel you are a little accomplished and desire a closer or different style photograph would the next progressive stage be to buy a bigger or different functioning lens? If this is the case for the natural progression of producing better images why does each manufacturer make so many different models?

And Now, Some Answers

Modern technology has done some marvellous things with media devices and the digital camera is no exception in this progression. The general features incorporated tend to be fairly similar across the board it is just a question of different formats, components, and variants that are used by the camera manufacturers that tend to dictate quality levels and camera performance.

What this means is that pretty much all the camera companies incorporate their products abilities to be mirrored within the industry. This does not mean that each camera comes with the exact same characteristics as there are several models produced by each manufacturer and every one of those cameras are different.

It is what is known as a step up process whereby you being the owner of one camera type will hopefully once you have complete familiarity and conquered most aspects will also buy some compatible lenses as well as some other progressive accessories also associated with that make and model.

Down the road you may want to upgrade the camera body itself, but would like to get a different make. The one you have seen and like the look of has a few additional benefits that will give you the opportunity to hopefully create better photographs and provide increased ability.

This is where the step up process really comes into its own right. While as stated there are certain similarities with each make of DSLR digital camera such as picture taking procedure and adjustable picture taking enhancements such as ISO settings etc that is pretty much where the real similarities end.

Not only is going from one camera make to another like learning the whole picture taking process again, but most of the accessories including lenses that we bought for the other camera will not be compatible with the new one that you have your eye on, this makes changing from manufacturer to manufacturer an elaborate and expensive exercise.

So what is the answer I hear you say? This is why there are several different models of camera from each manufacturer, the natural progression stage as far as they are concerned is for you to buy just the camera body for the next or several models higher than the one that you already have.

This will not only save you a lot of money due to the fact that your original lenses and accessories will be totally compatible with the new camera and with the money that you have saved in doing this you could buy even more lenses and accessories that will again keep you in that manufacturers loop even more.

It is not a bad loop to be in, but it should at least make you more cautious and go into greater research prior to buying your original camera.

Manufacturers are continually bringing out better and better models so the likelihood of you ever reaching the top of the range would not only be an expensive target, but a short lived one if you did as they would soon be bringing out a newer model to supersede the one we had recently purchased.

Always chose your initial camera manufacturer wisely because chances are that you will be using them for a very long time unless you have an inexhaustible budget.

One of the best ways to guarantee that you are getting the best deal and at the best price is to make any camera or photographic purchase online.

The reason for this is that high street stores and malls have massive overheads where-as online there are plenty of competition, but only a few places that you will get exactly what you want and at a bargain price.

It is for this reason that it can take a while to locate a good source for discounts free delivery etc, but once the job is done you will not have to ever look anywhere else again.

Hopefully by now you should have a pretty good idea on choosing the right DSLR digital camera for you, or at least a grasp on what it is you might want to be looking out for?




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

jewelery photography with canon eos 300D digital?




Ahmad


I have a canon eos 300d digital with 35 80 mm lens 1:4 5.6 lens , one white box , 2 2700 K 220 V and 2 6400 K 220 V bulbs

Most of the jewelery that i will shoot are small glass beads or silver rings .

What are the best settings for my cam to take such jewelery with these equipments ?

And do you know any website that can guide me to learn about basics of jewelery photography ?



Answer
The camera is capable, not sure about that lens. What matters most with the lens and jewelry is close focus and sharpness. You want the maximum amount of frame filled with the piece, and I don't think you will get very close with that lens.

Are your light specs referring to color trempurature, or something else? A 2700k lamp would be down in the sodium vapor orange light range, while a 6400k lamp would be blue-tinted white. Mixing the two would be awful. You could succesfully use one or the other... lamp power is not as important, since you should be shooting off a tripod or stand, so shutter speed is not an issue.

You need to get into your manual and read how to set a custom white balance. Do that first! If you don't have a light meter, you can use the camera's meter to get an idea of your settings. You normally want as much depth of field as you can get without fuzziness showing up, try starting at f/11 or so. See what the camera thinks... as an example 1/2 second at f/11. Now put the camera on manual and apply those settings, focus and put the lens on manual so it won't try and re-focus every time you press the shutter. Take a few shots, check what they look like on the camera screen. It would be better to pull the memory card and check the shots on the computer screen instead, but you can't have everything.

Once you get this all set up, it becomes much easier and faster. With the camera on the stand, and a remote release!, you can shoot as fast as you can set new pieces in the lightbox. Check the shots when you change something drastic, like from silver jewelry to dark colored beads, just to make sure. You may have to tweek your exposure a small amount between them, but it shouldn't be by much.

Like anything else, once you get a "system" worked out, it is an easy thing to do.

Canon eos 500D or 50D, which is better for jewelry photography?




Pigeon





Answer
Neither or both. The camera does not matter. What will matter is the lens that you use. You will need a good macro lens and some lighting to get good jewelry shots.

I would get the cheaper camera and either the EFs 60mm F2.8 macro or the EF 100mm F2.8. A light tent and some lights would be a good idea as well.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Nikon 10.2MP DSLR Camera With AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm Lens (non-VR) Kit (D3000)?




Luna


is the Nikon 10.2MP DSLR Camera With AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm Lens (non-VR) Kit (D3000) a good camera?for taking pics in fast motion??? thanks.


Answer
Any dSLR can take photos of action (fast motion), you just have to use a shutter speed that is 1/500th second or faster.

If you are shooting field sports, you will need a longer lens like the 55-300 mm or 50-200 mm lens

I agree, the new D3100 will give you more bang for the buck

does the 18-55 vr kit lens that comes with the nikon d3100 autofocus?




Mr Know it





Answer
All Nikon "kit lenses" that are officially packed with Nikon DSLR cameras will autofocus with the bodies they're matched with.

The 18-55mm VR is a nice, compact, inexpensive gateway lens that will give you autofocus and excellent results for general photography.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/18-55mm-vr.htm

Here's some sample results taken with a Nikon D3100 and the 18-55mm AF-S VR lens.
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=18-55mm&cm=nikon%2Fd3100&s=int




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

How do I clean my DSLR camera lens?




Mindy


Do I need to buy anything to properly clean it? Is there a certain kind of cloth? When I do clean it, should I wipe the lens by doing circles or?

Thanks



Answer
I disagree only slightly with "screwdriver". I do not think the first thing to do is brush the lens. The first thing to do is BLOW the lens with a proper blower. Get the lens as clean as you can without ever touching it. Then after blowing away all loose grit, then gently brush it with a proper lens brush. In most cases, that is all you will ever have to do. If some substance does get on the lens, yes, the Eclipse fluid and Pec Pads are great, but there are less expensive alternatives.

Here is a cleaning kit that would be the best $11 you ever spent for you lenses:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/343088-REG/Giottos_CL1001_Lens_Cleaning_Kit_with.html

steve

How do I clean my DSLR camera lens?




Anie


Is there any way I can do it just this once because I don.t have a lens cloth or blower or even lens spray. Or is the only option to buy those things because I do not want to harm my camera or scratch the lens. Thank you.


Answer
get the lens cleaning pen or cloth what is it to buy 10-20$ of equipment for a such great investments . If u use something too rough u might scratch it and spoil the lens




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Canon 5D original + better lens or 5DMKII + kit lens?




INeedHelp


the prive of the original 5D has dramticaly went down. ive seen them going for around 800-900 a body. i am planning to upgrade but i dont know. my budget is 3500. I do not have any lenses build up so if iwere to get mkII i would only be able to get something like the kit lens (24-105 4L). if i get mkI i can get like a sigma 70-200 2.8 and 24-70 2.8 which is almost a whole 2.8 trinity (10-24 24-70 and 70-200) but then again i can go for the mkii and make money through the kit lens and buy better and faster glass later on. my plan is to stick with one of the cams for 5 years and upgrade after so mkii will have more value if i sell it. just wondering so i can get one becore christmas holidays. thanks


Answer
The "Kit" lens (24-105 mm L) is hardly what is considered a cheapo lens ( http://www.amazon.com/Canon-24-105mm-USM-Lens-Cameras/dp/B000AZ57M6 ). It is generally > $1,000.

The 10-24 mm lens does not work with it. There isn't one for Canon. Nikon makes one, but it's for cropped sensor only.

What do you mean, make money with it? Are you buying the camera / lens as an investment and hope to make money when you sell it? Don't take this the wrong way--if you mean to take photos and make money from that, you're not ready yet.

-------------

Sorry--didn't really answer your question. You will find that the original 5D is a fine camera. And at 12 MP files that it gives you, you can blow it up to a poster sized print, like this http://www.flickr.com/photos/little_pooky/2501007156/ (This one was enlarged to 20 x 30 inch print and it looked fine).

This is from mark II http://www.flickr.com/photos/little_pooky/5237074902/

These cameras are hardly for sport photos if you're aiming to shoot ten frames per second. It's more or less for studio work.

---------------

canon camcorder lens on 5d mark ii?




Cecilia


i love the quality of the hd movie on the 5d mark ii but the photo lenses aren't right for videos at all.

i don't want to buy a lens and have it not fit so does anybody know if it will? if not what movie lens would? thanks!



Answer
The EOS 5D Mark II uses a full-frame 24x36mm CMOS sensor for all the images it produces, whether they are still photos or movies. This sensor is approximately 10 to 20 times the size of the image sensors used in most HD camcorders regardless of cost. This sensor size difference means that for any given combination of aperture value, subject distance and angle of view, images from the EOS 5D Mark II are going to have much shallower depth of field than images from a conventional HD device. The situation is somewhat similar to the comparison of an 8 x 10 format view camera to a 35mm SLR.

This difference in the look of movies created by the EOS 5D Mark II is part of the reason why this camera is embraced by creative professionals. Together with the wide selection of interchangeable EF lenses, the relatively large imaging format of the EOS 5D Mark II creates a look that cannot be duplicated by any other movie capture device on the market today.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Monday, April 7, 2014

PHOTOGRAPHERS! URGENT HELP!?




aleX


I'm looking at purchasing a DSLR. Mostly for portrait, nature, and family use.

Here's what I'm deciding between.

http://southdakota.ebayclassifieds.com/everything-else/brookings/canon-eos-30d-w-17-85mm-f-4-5-6-is-usm-lens-and-bg-e2n-battery-grip/?ad=9858572

http://cgi.ebay.com/Canon-EOS-500D-Rebel-T1i-18-55-mm-lens-15-/180642884759?pt=Digital_Cameras&hash=item2a0f27ac97#ht_500wt_1156

http://cgi.ebay.com/Canon-EOS-450D-Rebel-XSi-EF-S-18-55mm-lens-/140526590765?pt=Digital_Cameras&hash=item20b8099b2d#ht_720wt_1141


If you can have any idea/suggestions let me know! :)



Answer
Skip the 30D. The 30D isn't a bad camera but it's old tech and who knows how much use it's seen. Unless you know how to check for sensor damage, mold in the lens, number of actuations taken ... I'd stay away from used gear from individuals.

You know what they say ... Caveat Emptor.

Same with your second listing. a T1i ... used ... for 530$? You can buy it new for 690$.

475$ for an Xsi ... used no less ... is again ridiculous. You can get that one new for next to nothing 650$

Unless it;s half price or less ... not really worth it. you don;t know if they dropped it, did alot of SUPER long exposures (heat damage), if they've been wet ... too many things can go wrong.

If I had to choose ... out of the 3, I would take the Xsi (I own one and a T1i and have had a chance to shoot with a 7D, 60D, 1D Mk IV and a whole plethora of cameras). The Xsi is a very decent starting camera. The video on the T1i is more a novelty than of any use as you have no real control over settings like ISO while shooting and the audio is terrbile (very nice pictures thought)

Check out my website for shots taken with an Xsi and/or a T1i.
www.evildaystar.ca (website is a mess ... tryiong to clean it up).
And check out my flickr for some shots as well: http://www.flickr.com/photos/51633413@N07/

which of these cameras is the best & most expensive?




SchoolSuck


Canon Eos 7d 18mp Digital Slr Camara Dslr

Nikon Coolpix P100 10mp Kit Case, Tripod

Nikon D90 12.3 Megapixel Nikon 18-200 Vr

Nikon D5000 Kit 18-55 + 55-200 Af-S Nikkor Vr Lenses

Canon Eos 40d + Accessories, Extra Batteries + 4gb Card

Canon Eos 500d / Rebel T1i Kit With Ef-S 18-55mm

Canon Eos Kiss X4 T2i 550d Slr

Nikon D3000 Vr Kit Af-S Dx 18-55mm Lens+Nikon Bag


Nikon Coolpix P90 12.1 Mp 24x Optical Zoom 3 Screen

Canon Eos 450d W/ 18-55mm & 55-250mm Is Lens


Canon Eos 50d Digital Slr 5 Lenses, 16gb Card
Idc about that... I just want an answer to the question. I can get them for $500 each but want to know which is best



Answer
i personally prefer Nikon D90 DX 12.3MP Digital SLR Camera which is really good.

* 12.3-megapixel DX-format CMOS imaging sensor
* 5.8x AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens included
* D-Movie Mode; Cinematic 24fps HD with sound
* 3-inch super-density 920,000-dot color LCD monitor
* Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D90-Digital-18-105mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B001ENOZY4/?tag=pntsa-20




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

How much is a Canon 650D with the lens?

Q. I think the body of the camera is about $800, but I get confused with either it means both the body and lens, or just the body. If I were to get both, how much would it be about? Thanks in advance! (:


Answer
At the moment BH Photo has the T4i marked down to
$648 for body only
$649 for body with 18-55mm IS kit lens
$799 for body with 18-135mm STM lens.
The 18-135mm STM lens purchased by itself is $481.
I think your best value would be to get the body with 18-135mm STM kit.
If you are not in the U.S. (which would explain it being called the 650D) the prices can be different. Pay close attention to whether the vendor you are looking at is offering the new 18-135mm STM or the old 18-135mm IS. Don't get the old lens.

Should i buy canon 650D for filmmaking? Tell me why? What lens to buy?




Christian


How much do i expect to pay.


Answer
Really you should get a video camera for videoing.

Note that most DSLR cameras don't have continuous AF in video mode and it's only achieved with STM lenses for the 650D, not with the regular EF or EF-S lenses.

afaik there's only a 40mm and 18-135mm STM lens at the moment.

Video cameras generally have a much wider zoom range than any DSLR so you may be restricted there. On a video the zoom is motorised so can be smoother than zooming on a DSLR.

A lot will depend on what you want to video.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is an cheaper alternative to the Canon EF 100mm F 2.8 USM Macro Lens?




Alex


I need a decent canon or after market lens for my T2i. thanks


Answer
I use the Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro EX DG.
Not all that much cheaper, but a superlative lens, and in some ways more useful on the APS-C sensor of the T2i as it doubles as a cracking portrait perspective lens, the 100mm is just a little to long for this.

Canon do an ancient but decent 50mm f2.5 which is substantially cheaper, and can often be picked up used. Not 'life size' and means a closer working perspective, but optically a good lens.

Sigma do a 50mm f2.8 DG Macro which is life size, very good quality and around half the price of the Canon 100 new.

I use my 70mm on a 550D and 7D.

Good macro photography lens for Canon t2i?




Stephanie


I have a Canon t2i with the EF-S 18-55 IS kit lens and a EF 70-300mm IS USM telephoto lens.
I want to do some macro photography and have been considering the EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM.
So is it a good macro lens, or is there other better macro lens in the same price range?
Thanks



Answer
The Canon 100mm macro is a fantastic lens. It gives true 1:1 macro, is a fast-shallow f2.8 and, along with great macro performance, It is my primary portrait lens (full frame 5D, it would be a little too telephoto for your camera).

I was lucky and found mine locally on craigslist for about 1/2 price. I would not hesitate to recommend this lens, even new at full retail. Very versatile for a prime lens.

Really want to get great macro shots, put a ring-light flash on this lens...just WOW.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Why are camera lenses so expensive?




.


I mean... it's just a piece of glass....


Answer
Camera lenses are so expensive because the demand for these lenses exists among consumers to such a level that the manufacturer can charge that price for the available supply of lenses.


But for what it's worth, a camera lens is just a piece of glass in the same way that a computer is just a calculator.

Can anybody please help me more about camera lenses?




Kenjii_Won


I don't understand what is the difference between some of the lenses. For example, what is the difference between 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G and 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G. I don't understand it really. Please help me. And what kind of lense should I use for landscape photography and what lenses for portrait and street photography? I heard people say they use a 50mm lenses for street photography. Then can I use the 18-55mm lenses?
I'm using a Nikon D3100.



Answer
The first distinction of lenses is the focal length.

The shorter lengths are for wide angle shots (say landscapes and wide vistas of mountains, or even inside photos of a cathedral where you want to take in everything).

The longer lengths are for bringing distant objects close. Think of these lenses like binoculars.

The "f" numbers are the maximum aperture (largest opening), and among other things tell you how much light your lens will let into the sensor. And typically the lower the number, the higher quality the lens is as it is more expensive to make such lenses.

So when you look for lenses, there are three criteria.

First, the lens has to cover the range you are wanting to photograph. Second, the aperture, which provides the lens's ability for low light, and lastly, the cost.

Within that criteria, there are also other things to consider.

All zoom lenses have lower quality than prime (non-zoom) lenses. While these days zoom lenses are much improved, the best zoom lenses are still 3x or less. Lenses such as the 18-300mm you mentioned is a 17x zoom (called a super-zoom), and the quality of such a lens is too poor for some photographers. But other photographers are willing to compromise the lens quality for the convenience of having s single lens.

I own a 18-200mm lens, and I make such a trade off with this lens. It is not very good when used wide open (maximum aperture), but if I stop down to an aperture of f/8, then it is pretty good. So the compromise I make with this lens is that af f/8, I can only use it in daylight conditions if I want the best photos.

So this is my "vacation lens", and I only use it on vacations as it is easier to carry than a suitcase full of lenses, and I am willing to accept the compromise of using it in daylight conditions only.

The second lens you mentioned, the 55-300mm lens is what is more traditionally thought of as a telephoto zoom. At 5x, it is closer to being ideal, but unfortunately, it is an entry-level lens, so it also has some optical issues when used wide open. And it has the low-cost characteristics of not having internal focusing (the lens barrel turns when focusing), and it has the first generation VR.

However, both lenses are less expensive than the high end professional lenses that cost multi-thousands of dollars, so the limitations are acceptable for anyone but professionals.

Also, both of these lenses are "DX", intended for APS DSLRs (cropped). Other Nikon lenses may be "FX", and while they can be used on a APS DSLR, they can also be used with a full frame DSLR. However, DX lenses cannot be used on a full frame DSLR, so if you are ever thinking of upgrading, buying FX lenses vs. DX lenses is a consideration.

The 50mm lens you mentioned is a great lens. But on your camera, you may find you have to backup a bit. For that reason, some folks that have DX cameras prefer the 35mm lens. I still prefer the 50mm lens on a DX camera, because I like the lower perspective distortion from such a lens, even though I have to backup a bit.

Finally, your D3100 is an entry level DSLR. As such, it can only autofocus with AF-S lenses (which have built-in focus motors in the lens). Older legacy AF lenses require the focus motor to be in the camera, so your camera cannot autofocus those. Only the advanced amateur and professional cameras can use autofocus those lenses.

While that means your lens selection is more limited by not using AF lenses, there are still plenty of AF-S lenses available, as Nikon has slowly been moving away from AF. Even today, only a handful of AF lenses are still produced. These are older designs still in production. Virtually all DX lenses are AF-S (except for the 10.5mm fisheye).

This is just hitting the highlights of lenses. You could write a book about just the different lenses and their purposes.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

An o.k. quality Macro Lens for a Canon 40d digital camera?




tranquil_m


What brand of Macro lens would be suggested to get for my Canon 40d digital camera? Would prefer one that would take a clear, non distorted photo but yet not be super super super expensive. --- --- --- ((Not looking for a zoom lens really, already have a 28-135 zoom lens, but I can not stand close enough to the subjects to actually get a good/close macro shot of them with that zoom lens.))


Answer
Your 40D deserves a quality lens and one of THE best Macro lenses available...is the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro. It costs less than $500 US (that's not super super expensive, is it?).
But, it doesn't have "o.k. quality". In fact, it has excellent image quality and sharpness! And, it also make a great portrait lens.

Check out the reviews below...

Whats the best general purpose lens for Canon Rebel XT..?




Ashwin Kum


I own a Canon Rebel XT with the default 18-55 kit lens and tamron 70-300 macro lens. i am not satisfied with the performance of both the lens. so looking forward to buy a new one.. can any one tell me which one should i buy... I definetly cannot afford canon L series lens.. so whats the best alternative?
wud perfer 2x -1xx mm range
i wud expect sharper images..



Answer
For your walk around lens, have a look at the Canon 28-135mm ($420) http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=149629&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
and the Canon 17-85mm ($510) http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=351548&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
Both are noticibly better than the 18-55. Depending on what end of the zoom is more important to you, either one should do nicely until you win the lottery and buy that 24-105mm L.
For more ideas, you can browse the Canon-SLR-Lens forum at DP Review: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1029&page=10




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What are some good photography cameras?




(: ily


i do photography and im looking to buy a really good/professional photography camera.
can anyone give me some suggestions && prices?



Answer
Professional cameras are top of the line DSLR designed for hundreds of thousand of activations and consistent day to day operations in all situations and conditions. Most people don't want or need a camera like that. Nor do they want the cost that goes with them

What you do want is a good quality Digital Single Lens Reflex camera. That will give you great color, clarity and quality photos. Both Canon and Nikon make great cameras and in truth it usually comes down to personal preference. So look at both, go and get them in hand to see which you like the feel of better and you'll not be wrong with either brand. Since you already have a Nikon SLR then getting another Nikon will let you use lenses and accessories you already have. You do not have to start from scratch

As to a recommendation IMHO Dollar for dollar there is no better entry level DSLR than the Nikon 40. Do not let the low megapixel count concern you. If you do not make very very large prints you will never notice it. It is easy and fun to use. It gives great quality pictures. I have both a D300 and a D40 and I often grab the D40 for family shots just because it is so fun to use and light. The D40 will let you grow as you learn more about cameras. Nikon makes a number of lenses for the camera as do third party lens manufacturers.

A great review on it can be found here

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm


If you can afford a little more the D60 give you a number of things you want. It has newer firmware and image processors, designed for the 10 mp sensor. It has an "Active Dust Reduction System with Airflow Control ". Nikon not putting a system on the D40 to deal with dust is one of the biggest drawbacks I see to the D40 ( though I think its still a great camera for the money) If you change lenses dust will get in and the camera needs a system to deal with it. With the D60 you get a VR lens. That will help with low light situations ( they may offer that now with the D40 but originally it was not) . The D60 has Adaptive Dynamic Range. Nikon calls it "Active D-Lighting," it lets you save some highlights that my otherwise be lost. It has a newer better metering system than the D40.

Some people will want to make a big issue out of the fact that there are some nikon lenses that will not autofocus on these cameras. Right now there are "only" about 39 lenses that autofocus on these cameras. They cover the range of focal lengths. I doubt any photographer would be seriously limited with "only" this many lenses to choose from. If you want to manually focus you can more than double this and do so at a low cost. Manual focusing is easy and how we did things for decades before the advent of autofocus.

Cannon and Nikon chose to put the vibration reduction in the lens rather than the body. Somefolks put it in the camera and make of that. Yes that means you get stabilization only on lenses with that feature built in. In the body in theory it would work on every lens. But in fact image stbilization in the lens has proved to work faster and smoother with a lower impact on focus times than image stabilization in the body

First professional camera?




Brooke


I'm an aspiring concert photographer, and I want to start taking more professional photographs. I've never bought a professional camera before, and I don't want to buy the wrong one and regret it. My price range is 200-500, I can't get anything truly expensive. PLEASE HELP ME!!
EDITED:
ok ok. not a professional camera! What kind of DSLR would you reccommend? Sorry for sounding completely naive, I've never bought a camera that was not p&S. any help is appreciated!



Answer
There's no such thing as a "professional camera" in the $200.00-$500.00 price range. A professional level camera, bare minimum, for just the body, no lens, you're looking at around $2,000.00.

For the price you're talking, you're looking at an entry-level camera. Stick to the proven manufacturers Nikon/Canon/Sony, etc., and you'll likely be happy. Each camera in the same price range from each of the proven manufacturers compete well with each other.

***EDIT: I'm assuming you want a dSLR, and not a hybrid type of camera. If so, for around the upper limit of what you're looking to spend, I'd recommend either the Sony A37, the Canon Rebel T3, or the Nikon D3100.

Each of those cameras are comparable in overall quality to each of the others - with each one having only very slight, but not significant, advantages and disadvantages in certain areas compared with the others. For example, if having the best quality video capabilities on your camera is important to you, the Sony has a slight edge over the others in that regard, but it also has a slight disadvantage compared to the others when it comes to high ISO shooting.

But, no matter which you decide on, if you're not happy with one of those cameras, you wouldn't be happy with any of the others either. Each camera from each manufacturer competes with each camera from each other manufacturer in the same price range. So, if you're not happy with one of those cameras, the only way to be happy would be to move up to a model in a higher price category, not simply to move to a different manufacturer's camera in the same price range.

The best thing you can do, really, is to visit a good camera shop and spend a little bit of time playing around with the different models. See which one feels the most comfortable in your hands, and which one's menu system seems the most intuitive to you.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What Carl Zeiss lens auto focusses on a Nikon DSLR?




Vernan


What Carl Zeiss lens auto focusses on a Nikon DSLR?
@Dr. Iblis
Even if the camera has an AF motor?



Answer
Here is a link to Zeiss licensed lenses from 2009

http://www.photographybay.com/2009/11/16/new-carl-zeiss-zf-2-series-lenses-for-nikon-mount/

The current Zeiss website.

http://lenses.zeiss.com/photo/en_DE/products/slr/distagont3518.html

I don't see an auto-focus lens in the bunch except those made by Sony under Zeiss license

My guess is that if you are going to the expense of buying a Zeiss lens, you will take the time to mount your camera on a tripod and manually focus the lens

Here is the latest announced Zeiss lens and it is manual focus

http://www.dpreview.com/news/2010/9/1/carlzeiss35mm1p4#specs

"Even if the camera has an AF motor?" An auto-focus motor in the lens only works if the lens has a mechanical connection that the auto-focus motor can use.

Is it true that most professional photographers consider the hasselblad with carl-zeiss lens the best camera?




Stevesteve





Answer
I think it depends on which professionals you are talking about. Most professionals are working in news, stock, some weddings and celebrity photography, and in those cases, dSLRs are the best choice, like from Canon and Nikon. But if you are talking studio photography and weddings, primarily, then I think yes, the Hasselblad system with Zeiss lenses holds a special place for those pros. Things have changed in the last few years, though, due to the transition to digital.

Hasselblad's newest cameras do not use Zeiss lenses, but those made by Fujinon. And they are outstanding.

I've personally used a 503cw with Zeiss lenses and it is very very nice equipment, and of course very expensive. I'm hoping to see digital backs for these cameras come down further in price, and when they do, there will probably be thousands sold because there are countless 500-series cameras out there.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sunday, April 6, 2014

DSLR camera?




Caitlin


I'm looking for a digital SLR camera. Preferably not too expensive. Does anyone have suggestions?


Answer
Two cameras come to mind when you ask for a DSLR that's not too expensive. Here you go:

~~~~~~~~~~

Nikon D40

The Nikon D40 is a great little camera, very easy to use and quite reasonably priced. It has a few "consumer friendly" totally automatic modes that make it very easy to use, but still offers total photographic control when you are ready to take charge. It will get you in the Nikon family which is a great place to be. If you buy accessories and lenses, you will be able to use everything on any Nikon that you might upgrade to later on.

Check out Nikon's "Picturetown" promotion, where they handed out 200 D40's in Georgetown, SC. http://www.stunningnikon.com/picturetown/

Here are a few reviews, in case you have not read them yet. Be sure to note that they are several pages long and some of the reviews also have some sample images that you can look at.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40/
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2007_reviews/nikon_d40.html
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3756/camera-test-nikon-d40.html
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40/d40-recommendations.htm

I hate to see people slam the camera because it can't autofocus with older Nikon lenses. It is true that there is a "slight problem" with older Nikon lenses not autofocusing on the D40, but if you do not own a bag full of older lenses, it is not going to be a problem. It is barely a problem anyhow. If you check www.nikonusa.com for "AF-S" lenses, which are ALL 100% compatible with the D40, you will find 23 lenses, including 7 "VR" (vibration Reduction) lenses and one true macro lens with "VR". There are another 25-plus lenses in the current catalog that provide all functions except autofocus as well as many (possibly dozens) "out of print" lenses that will work just as well. In addition, although these lens will not autofocus, most of them will still give focus confirmation. From the D40 manual: "If the lens has a maximum aperture of f/5.6 of faster, the viewfinder focus indicator can be used to confirm whether the portion of the subject in the selected focus area is in focus. After positioning the subject in the active focus area, press the shutter release button halfway and rotate the lens focusing ring until the in-focus indicator is displayed."

The D40 only has 3 autofocus zones arranged horizontally at the center, 9 o'clock and 3 o'clock positions. This might be considered a limitation, but realistically, most people will find this perfectly adequate, especially if you are moving up from a point and shoot with only a center zone.

You can get the D40 with the 18-55 kit lens at B&H Photo available through Yahoo! Shopping or at 1-800-622-4987) for $550 (May 2007) and this is with TWO Lexar 1 GB cards. You can get the same kit with one Lexar Platinum (higher speed) card for $560. Or - get the D40 with 18-135 lens and 1 GB Lexar card for $760.

~~~~~~~~~~

Pentax K100D - Cheapest Decent SLR

The cheapest DSLR that is worth owning is probably the Pentax K100D, and this is coming from a Nikon fan. This is a decent camera.

You can click on individual user comments on this page:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/read_opinions.asp?prodkey=pentax_k100d

You can read the dpreview.com "Highly Recommended" review here:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk100d/

You can also read this review of the K100D here:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/k100d.html

I used to recommend the Pentax K110D as the best entry level dSLR, but I do not see it for sale at B&H Photo or Adorama. The entry level seems to now be the K100D. The only difference between these two cameras is that the K100D includes "shake reduction," which adds some expense to the camera.

Adorama has the K100D with the 18-55 lens for $489.95, after a $50 rebate. The rebate ends on July 31, 2007. You will still need a memory card and I would suggest at least the 1 GB Sandisk Ultra II SD card, which costs about $30. You can get the 2 GB for $35, so it would be silly not to go for the 2 GB card.

As of this writing (5-9-07), B&H is NOT showing the $50 rebate on the K100D with the 18-55 lens, but they ARE showing it for the body alone. Since this is a Pentax manufacturer's rebate, I would speculate that this is an error on the web site. If you prefer buying from B&H, you can call them at 1-800-622-4987 to inquire about this matter.

If you want "higher" quality and want to spend double the money, get back to me............and I'll tell you about the Nikon D80.

~~~~~~~~~~

Ways to manually adjust aperture on lens while taking video with Nikon DSLR Camera?




Morgan


Is there a way (or multiple ways) to adjust the aperture using a Nikon DSLR camera while taking video? I have a D7000 and a wide assortment of lenses. Many old lenses I realize have adjustable aperture rings on the lens itself which seems to be a feature incompatible with newer cameras [unless f-stop is set to 22] and lacking from newer lenses (note: I am completely unaware of any adapters that offer a means of making this option compatible.)

I know there are some specific 3rd party lenses out there that have aperture rings on them so you can adjust your depth of field range/brightness while taking video but am at a loss of how to find them.

Any hints, suggestions, techniques, links, companies, lens models etc... would be greatly helpful.

{Incase it wasn't clear, my main objective is to find a way to broaden/narrow my depth of field while taking video using an adjustable aperture ring on the camera's lens}

Thank you all in advance for any input : )



Answer
When shooting video, the only control of the exposure are the following

* adjust the lens aperture
* adjust the ISO of the camera
* add or subtract light from the scene

If you want to decrease the depth of field by opening the lens, you will have to reduce the sensitivity of the sensor or add an ND filter to the lens. Usually it is very difficult to reduce the actual amount of light in a specific scene

If you want to increase the depth of field, you need to close the lens aperture down until you have just the right amount of depth of field. With less light reaching the sensor, you will either have to up the ISO of the sensor or add more light to the scene.

Whether you use an actual aperture ring or control the depth of field using the camera control, really does not matter much.

You are now beginning to see just one of the drawback of trying to use a dSLR camera with a video "
feature" can be vexing.

What you may want to read before you start spending a lot of money on accessories to make your fine D7000 into a usable video camera. These problems will be encountered no matter what dSLR you use

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/camcorders/cam-cam.shtml

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/techniques/3_years_later_dslr_video_one_mans_perspective.shtml




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

DSLR Camera Lens Distance Help?




Sam K


I'm getting my first DSLR camera and it comes with a kit lens that is 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 Zoom Lens. After I buy the camera I won't be able to afford any more lenses. I'm wondering how far this lens can shoot. I like to take close up pictures of things in a far distance. Can you please give me a basic guesstimate of how many yards away it can shoot something.
The camera is a Sony Alpha A230



Answer
Sam,

The lens you're asking about is really best for landscape (wide angle) and portrait shots. Not for telephoto zoom at a distance.

If that longer distance zoom is what you want and you can only afford one "kit" (bundled) lens with your camera body you should ask the seller if you can get the 55-200mm kit lens in place of the 18-55mm.

Honestly though, I'd suggest two alternative options for your consideration:

1- Purchase a superzoom "bridge" camera instead of the Sony DSLR starter camera. They have fixed, not interchangeable, lenses. But they zoom from wide to long, include manual, semi-manual and auto modes and will allow you to learn the photography skills you'd need to operate a DSLR when you can better afford one (& its expensive associated lenses). Highly rated superzooms include the: Canon SX20-IS or SX10-IS (the older model of the two but still excellent) or Nikon P100.

2- If you really dream of having a DSLR, then consider a Canon or Nikon rather than the Sony. Sony's are quite good, but the other two brands will provide many more lens and accessory options AND they are often sold in promo pkgs bundled with 2 "kit" lenses - the wide to medium zoom and the medium to long telephoto zoom - probably for the same price you're likely paying for one included lens. Look for a sale! There are also 3rd party lens makers like Sigma, Tamron and Tokina that make a lot less expensive lenses than some of the equivalent Canon or Nikon offerings - in mount sizes that fit the typical Canon & Nikon bodies.

Good luck in your choice!

Interchangeable lens camera <$1100?




Matthew Ch


There's so many damn choices and I am unable to make up my mind! help!


Answer
Take a serious look at the Pentax K-30. Its currently the lowest-priced Weather Resistant (WR) DSLR available. WR means its safe to take it out in the rain or use it in very dusty conditions.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/pentax-k30/pentax-k30A.HTM

The K-30, in addition to its WR feature, has a few additional features not found on any comparably priced Nikon or Canon DSLR.

First, it has a focusing motor in the camera body. You have to move all the way up to the Nikon D7000 to find that feature.

Second, it has the Pentax version of Image Stabilization (IS) in the camera body so any lens used becomes an IS lens. Nikon and Canon have their respective versions of IS in some but not all of their lenses so with them you get to pay over and over for the same feature.

Third, since the K-30 uses the "K" lens mount introduced in 1975 any "K" mount lens ever made - manual focus or auto focus - can be used with it. Although Nikon can also lay claim to using the same lens mount since 1959 - the "F" mount - a Nikon AF lens will not auto focus an any Nikon model below the D7000. Canon abandoned their "FD/FL" lens mount for the "EF" mount in 1988 which is currently used on all their DSLR cameras. However, there are two lens lines from Canon - the budget "EF-S" lenses and the professional grade "EF" lenses. The "EF-S" lenses CANNOT be used on a Canon full-frame DSLR like the 6D, 5D and 1D.

Fourth, Pentax introduced the first Japanese manufactured 35mm SLR long before Nikon and Canon.

Fifth, the K-30 uses a pentaprism viewfinder while comparably priced Nikons and Canons use the cheaper pentamirror viewfinder. A pentaprism viewfinder is brighter which means easier focusing in low-light situations.

Pentax K-30 w/18-55mm f3.5-5.6 WR zoom lens, $696.95 after a $100.00 'Instant Savings' from B&H that ends 6-30-2013. You can add the SMC Pentax DA 50-200mm f4-5.6 ED WR zoom for another $246.95. $943.90 for a two lens kit. By comparison, a Nikon D7000 body with no lens will cost you $996.95 and a camera without a lens is pretty much useless. A Canon T5i w/18-55mm f3.5-5.6 zoom lens is $899.00.

B&H - http://www.bhphotovideo.com




Powered by Yahoo! Answers