Showing posts with label best canon lens video. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best canon lens video. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2014

What lenses would be best to shoot video with?

best canon lens video on Best lens landscape photography - wide angle lenses Canon Nikon
best canon lens video image



That One G


I love filming videos and such and may be starting a youtube channel soon. I have a Canon t2i, which I know isn't the greatest for video but I don't wanna splash out on the new t4i. I'd rather buy a new lens that would spike up the quality of the videos. It doesn't particularly have to be a Canon lens, it just obviously would have to fit my t2i. Right now I just have a kit lens so I've really been wanting to get a new one! Any help? Thanks a bunch if you can.


Answer
Since you did not tell us what sort of videos you like to shoot/edit, it is difficult to make a recommendation.

For example, if you want to capture things that are REALLY far away, then a zoom lens would be appropriate. Or, if you like to capture skate boarders to video, perhaps a fisheye lens would be appropriate. These lenses are very different from capturing fashion/makeup tutorials or zombie movies, but they could be used for other things...

Otherwise, the lens you currently use on your t2i is fine until you decide what you need - then get that lens.

Should I buy a Canon Lens or a comparable third party lens for my Canon EOS digital?




Christina


Does anyone with a Canon EOS digital camera use a third party telephoto lens?

If so:

1. Which lens do you use?
2. From which company did you buy it?
3. Do you like it?

I plan to use the lens for photographing events around my community (rodeo, softball, etc.). What I am trying to decide is whether to buy a Canon lens or a less expensive third party lens.



Answer
To answer your questions:

Yes, in addition to some canon lenses (100mm macro, 50mm 1.4) I use a non-canon lens for my primary walk around lens.

1. I have the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8.
2. I bought it from Amazon.com most likely. I generally either buy from Amazon or B&H Photo & Video.
3. I like the Tamron lens just fine. I bought it mainly as an upgrade to the kit lens that came with camera. Generally the kit lenses only top out at f4.0 or f5.0 for their widest aperture and that can be limiting if you want to do low light photography without flash. I found that to be the case and I wanted to upgrade to an all-purpose lens that was faster than that.

Unfortunately, some of the Canon lenses at f2.8 can be a bit spendy (but worth every penny I'm sure) so I settled in the middle ground with this Tamron lens which had a good reputation. I've been pleased with the results. While not comparable to "L" glass (but what mid-range lenses do?), it produces excellent images with good sharpness and color that unless you're a hard-core pixel peeper you'll have nothing to complain about.

For the purposes you're talking about, it would make a fine all purpose lens particularly if you have to take photos at indoor events without a separate flash unit.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Which Tamron lens should I get for my Canon camera?

best canon lens video on Canon Lens Buddy 1.5.2 App for iPad, iPhone - Photography - app by ...
best canon lens video image



Ryan Prive


I am trying to decide between the Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 with the Vibration Compensation, or without. Other than that little feature it seems like the same lens, but the one with VC is about $150 more. I will be using this mostly for video, not pictures. I appreciate any help, but no answers like "get a Canon lens" please. Thanks.


Answer
The VC version can be just as sharp as the non-VC one, but based on my own experience it may have a backfocus at 50mm and wide open. If such issues are not recognized and accounted for, then that may seem like the lens is less good than it actually is.

Here is a comparison between the VC and the non VC version:
http://thrillmere.com/2010/09/tamron-17-50mm-f2-8-vc-v-s-non-vc-comparison/

The second set of shots (with the green bottle) are my own. As you can see, the copy of the VC version that i used there (with the 50mm backfocus corrected) is much better than the one used by the author of the article (who might not have had a misfocus corrected).

Myself, i find the minor misfocus at 50mm wide open to be worth having Tamron's excellent VC on the lens, as i do a lot of low light handheld photography. If you on the other hand are much into shallow depth of field work and therefore need a very accurate AF at 50mm, then the non-VC version would be better for you.

Is the Canon 18-135mm Lens good for general purpose shooting?




Joshua


I would like to use a lens for video and photo on my canon 60d. It's just for general use, I'm not trying to use it as a point and shoot camera, I'm just 16 and can't afford a lens for each purpose. Is a good lens or have you any ideas on a similar lens for my uses.


Answer
Yes - it covers moderate wide angle to moderate telephoto.

You will probably want to manual focus it during video or get an external microphone (as the camera will record the noise from the autofocus motor).




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Which Tamron lens should I get for my Canon camera?

best canon lens video on Digital SLR - Canon EOS REBEL XTI + Canon 18-55mm Digital SLR Camara ...
best canon lens video image



Ryan Prive


I am trying to decide between the Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 with the Vibration Compensation, or without. Other than that little feature it seems like the same lens, but the one with VC is about $150 more. I will be using this mostly for video, not pictures. I appreciate any help, but no answers like "get a Canon lens" please. Thanks.


Answer
The VC version can be just as sharp as the non-VC one, but based on my own experience it may have a backfocus at 50mm and wide open. If such issues are not recognized and accounted for, then that may seem like the lens is less good than it actually is.

Here is a comparison between the VC and the non VC version:
http://thrillmere.com/2010/09/tamron-17-50mm-f2-8-vc-v-s-non-vc-comparison/

The second set of shots (with the green bottle) are my own. As you can see, the copy of the VC version that i used there (with the 50mm backfocus corrected) is much better than the one used by the author of the article (who might not have had a misfocus corrected).

Myself, i find the minor misfocus at 50mm wide open to be worth having Tamron's excellent VC on the lens, as i do a lot of low light handheld photography. If you on the other hand are much into shallow depth of field work and therefore need a very accurate AF at 50mm, then the non-VC version would be better for you.

Is the Canon 18-135mm Lens good for general purpose shooting?




Joshua


I would like to use a lens for video and photo on my canon 60d. It's just for general use, I'm not trying to use it as a point and shoot camera, I'm just 16 and can't afford a lens for each purpose. Is a good lens or have you any ideas on a similar lens for my uses.


Answer
Yes - it covers moderate wide angle to moderate telephoto.

You will probably want to manual focus it during video or get an external microphone (as the camera will record the noise from the autofocus motor).




Powered by Yahoo! Answers