Angela
Which should I get? I can only get the old 18-135 (NOT the newer STM),
Or 18-200 ( which doesn't have USM, a con for me.
I've been told even the old -135 has better quality than -200 .
But-- is longer range more important?
Also I learned -135 is a kit lens for some bodies so would -200 be a greater deal?
Will use only this lens I choose , for travel, etc.
Thanks!
The 18- 135 costs P12,500 and the 18- 200 costs P 22,000. Please help!!! Which would be a betters value for money purchase?
Answer
My Nikon came with an 18-105mm lens that was all I needed for 3+ years, so the 18-135mm lens may be all the lens you will need for a while. The extra reach of the 18-200mm may be nice to have in certain circumstances, but they may be rare. I'd get the 18-135mm and use the rest of the money to start saving for a prime lens.
My Nikon came with an 18-105mm lens that was all I needed for 3+ years, so the 18-135mm lens may be all the lens you will need for a while. The extra reach of the 18-200mm may be nice to have in certain circumstances, but they may be rare. I'd get the 18-135mm and use the rest of the money to start saving for a prime lens.
18-200 L lens by Canon?
argentino
Has anyone heard or seen a Canon 18-200 L lens? My co-worker said she has one. I have looked everywhere and still haven't found one. A long or a photo p hi kg he nice.
Answer
You are right.
What they may have done is mistake IS for L on the lens
The "L" stands for "Low Dispersion" glass
The only 18-200 mm with special optics is the Nikkor AF-S 18-200 mm ED lens
ED lenses: Nikon developed ED (Extra-low Dispersion) glass
You are right.
What they may have done is mistake IS for L on the lens
The "L" stands for "Low Dispersion" glass
The only 18-200 mm with special optics is the Nikkor AF-S 18-200 mm ED lens
ED lenses: Nikon developed ED (Extra-low Dispersion) glass
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment