Sunday, August 11, 2013

Can a 100mm macro lens be used for landscape and family portraits?

best canon lens macro on 58mm Deluxe Wide Angle Lens Black With Macro Lens Bag Included. Lens ...
best canon lens macro image



fiber


I'm thinking of buying a 100mm Canon macro lens. But I also need a lens to take some family photos of 50 or so people (either wide angle or from far away). Can I use the same 100mm macro lens for both? Any pros/cons?


Answer
A 100mm macro lens on any Canon dSLR with an APS-C format sensor (any non-professional Canon digital SLR let's say) will have a crop factor of 1.6x. That means that a 100mm lens on a Canon EOS 300D Digital Rebel (just a random example) would actually be equivalent to a 160mm lens. In general, that focal length isn't going to be very useful for wide landscape photography or photos of large groups, but it would likely take very nice portraits of 1-3 people. That focal length is often considered part of the nice ranges of portrait lenses (around 85mm-180mm).

In a word though - "Nah" - that's not a good lens for both applications that you're interested in. Even at a straight 100mm you probably won't find an experienced photographer who will bless anything over, say, 35mm on the high end (no crop factor) for landscape/large group photos. On an APC-S sensor that would be about 17mm-18mm, which is quite common on zoom lenses now.

What happens if I do the "reverse prime" technique on an already macro-dedicated lens?







I have a 100mm Canon macro lens, and I was wondering what would happen if I did this technique on the lens. Would it reverse the macro back to a non-magnified view? I know that a lot of people use this technique to turn a normal lens into a makeshift macro lens, so I was wondering. I have seen some amazingly good quality macro images taken with a regular lens reversed, so if this would work on a macro lens would the quality be even better?


Answer
It won't make your macro lens do anything it doesn't already do.

The only issue is where the lens will focus. Other than that, it is just like using any other lens for the purpose. Most reverse-prime work is done with wide angle or standard lenses, not telephotos.

You could put a reversed prime on the end of the macro... that will work. I've done 28mm and 50mm on 105mm, but the focus point is right up against the object with a 28mm. Makes lighting a challenge.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is the best canon or nikon dslr camera for a reasonable price?

dslr camera lenses prices on Boston Stamp Book, Volume 3: Amazon.co.uk: Anonymous: Books
dslr camera lenses prices image



idk


I've never had one before and we're planning to buy one soon. Looking to spend 200 or 300 dollars or maybe a more expensive one but used. probably not including the lenses (sigh). I've been browsing flickr to see the quality of photos that certain cameras can take. the d3000 looks okay. i don't know a lot about dslr cameras but i will learn, so i'm not really looking for just a "beginnger" camera. but i also don't need a 3,000 dollar camera at the moment. opinions? thoughts?
ok she might be willing to pay 479 for this deal on the canon eos rebel t3 where you get a case and memory card and lens and lens cleaner etc. is that one good? the 200-300 isn't definite. just nothing over like 500??



Answer
I would suggest Canon EOS Rebel T3, it's a best dslr camera, take great pictures quality and easy to use. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004J3Y9U6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=cra45-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B004J3Y9U6

What is the BEST Nikon DSLR camera and lens currently available?




Mark


I want to buy my boyfriend, for his birthday, the most top of the line DSLR camera, from Nikon (they are his favorite). He is an extremely experienced and amazing photographer. I, however, know nothing of the subject. I do not know about the shutter speed, aperture, pixels, etc... Can you please help me? Price is not an issue, I just want to know the best camera Nikon offers (D7000? D5100?), and the best lens as well (I know even less about lenses...).

Thanks much!!!



Answer
Since money is no object...A Nikon D3x at $7,999.95. The lens would depend on what he is shooting.

For example, there is a:

600mm lens, great for nature for $10,300 or a
70-200 f/2.8 lens great for a lot of things for $2,199 ( I use the Canon equivalent for everything from portraits to wildlife to sports).

Here are more lenses to look at... http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ns=&ci=274&N=4288584247+4291315846&srtclk=sort

The thing to remember is that photography gear is mostly personal preference. My wife refuses to buy me camera gear because of it (she will buy anything else for me including a gun, but not photography stuff).

I would suggest that instead of buying him a camera and lenses, that you take him to lunch and then stop by the local camera shop (maybe blindfold him on the way there). Then say "Happy B-day...you can spend up to $xxxx". He will be delighted and like a kid in a candy store.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers