best canon lens sports image
Webbkie
What are the best Canon lens for the 50D EOS?
I'm a thirteen old boy who is into photography. I like taking sport shots of like rugby and cricket but i also like taking shots at parties (Generally indoors) but then i also like taking shots on wildlife. Which lens (plural) do you recommend. Keep in mind, I've only got 1.5 grand in the bank. Any links will be great!
Answer
Guys, give up answering this clown.
He keeps asking the same question, but changes his story as he goes along (the type of camera, his age, etc).
Guys, give up answering this clown.
He keeps asking the same question, but changes his story as he goes along (the type of camera, his age, etc).
How much of an improvement is a 300 mm lens compared to 200?
FF
I'm considering getting a 300 mm Canon lens.
Was wondering how much of an improvement the 300 mm lens is? For the moment I have one going to 200 mm. I like to take photos of cities, fast moving objects and structures. The detail here and there is cool too.
Cheers
Answer
There is no inherent 'improvement' at all.
Lenses are tools, and the nature of the task that you are doing determines which tools are most convenient. A 300mm lens has a longer focal length, which means only two things:
1. Subjects that are a given distance away from where you are standing with your camera will appear closer.
2. Given the same shooting position and aperture, you will have slightly less depth of field. That may translate into more effective separation of the subject from the background - but only if you know how to achieve that effect (it won't happen automatically).
A 300mm lens will be longer, heavier and more expensive. Does the types of photography that you do justify owning that lens? In general, the most common situations where photographers use a 300mm lens are sporting events and wildlife.
There is no inherent 'improvement' at all.
Lenses are tools, and the nature of the task that you are doing determines which tools are most convenient. A 300mm lens has a longer focal length, which means only two things:
1. Subjects that are a given distance away from where you are standing with your camera will appear closer.
2. Given the same shooting position and aperture, you will have slightly less depth of field. That may translate into more effective separation of the subject from the background - but only if you know how to achieve that effect (it won't happen automatically).
A 300mm lens will be longer, heavier and more expensive. Does the types of photography that you do justify owning that lens? In general, the most common situations where photographers use a 300mm lens are sporting events and wildlife.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment