Showing posts with label sony dslr camera lens review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sony dslr camera lens review. Show all posts

Thursday, February 13, 2014

advice on nikon vs sony vs olympus dslr please!?




doctoragl


Hello, I'm shopping for a DSLR camera... my first after using a megazoom for a while. I'm considering the Nikon 3100 (seems to have solid features and get good reviews)..
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3100/

but I loved my Sony, and I am wondering if there is a sony dslr of comparable quality and price to nikon 3100... how about this one for example? http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10151&catalogId=10551&langId=-1&productId=8198552921665345641 If I understand correctly, it has good zoom capacity.

Someone also recommended Olympus E420 http://www.dpreview.com/news/0803/08030501olympuse420.asp
Does anyone have knowledge/experience on this? I need some advice about image quality, user friendliness for an inexperienced dslr user, macro capacity, zoom, etc. If it helps, my photography is 90% nature and landscape, 10% sports.
Thanks so much
Thanks so much for your replies. I have since discovered that the Olympus E-620 has better built in stabilization than the 420 and is generally an improvement over the older model. I am now basically torn between the nikon 3100 and the Olympus .. any final advice? ;)



Answer
Hi D..,

Macro and zoom capability are dependent on the lens(es) selected, one of the advantages of owning a DSLR camera and al three of these brands have a good selection of lenses. The Nikon brand is one of the most popular brands sold but i believe Sony and Olympus offer better values for the $$.

The Nikon 3100 is a brand new model while the Olympus and Sony models are no longer manufactured and/or have limited availability. However, the Olympus E620 which is a comparable model to the Nikon has a number of features that make it very attractive although it does not have the capability to shoot video that the Nikon model includes. Particular advantages of the Olympus include a larger viewing screen with tilt and swivel features that are great for shooting at low angles and awkward locations when using the Live View feature. It also has illuminated control buttons that make it easier to see and adjust settings in low light. I also prefer the in body Image Stabilization (IS) feature of most Olympus and Sony models over the Vibration Reduction (VR) system used by Nikon. The VR system is incorporated into certain lenses while the IS of Olympus & Sony applies to nearly every lens that can be mounted. I prefer the IS system because it means that there are less complex electronics and fewer delicate systems that can require adjustment in the lenses making lens designs simpler and less likely to need repair/replacement. This also gives the photographer more control over the decision to use the feature without being concerned about what lens is mounted on the camera.

A Sony model that is comparable to the Nikon is a little bit harder to identify because Sony has a very rapid product upgrade cycle but the Alpha(A)390 would be a fairly comparable model that is available now. Like the Olympus this model doesn't have the video capability but does have in body IS (called "Steady Shot INSIDE" by Sony) and a tilting view screen (but not the swivel feature of the Olympus).

One note about Sony cameras, they have several models with "Translucent Mirrors". These are immovable mirrors that work something like one way mirrors that appear to be glass from one side but a mirror from the other side. While they reduce vibration and noise, this type of camera has been attempted before and never been very successful and I would avoid these models for two reasons 1) the mirrors "split" the light thus reducing viewfinder brightness and diverting some light from the film/image sensor and 2) they have proven to be very delicate and difficult/expensive to repair.

All of these models have dust reduction but the Olympus version is widely recognized as the best dust reduction system a function which they developed and patented before anyone else included it in their cameras. In general I would say the Nikon would be the best choice for shooting very high speed sports action, the Olympus would be the best quality for the $$$ (their optics generally are the among the best available) with a slight edge for nature photography while the Sony would get the best marks for easy to use interface and is a good overall camera.

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 Digital Camera +2 SONY LENS & 1GB!?




lakeyorkie


http://cgi.ebay.com/Sony-Alpha-DSLR-A100-Digital-Camera-2-SONY-LENS-1GB_W0QQitemZ130067607397QQihZ003QQcategoryZ30020QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

I found this deal does anyone have this camera.? and do you have the remote? is it any good? i am particularly interested in how it works by remote, but cant seem to find the research on it. I was hoping some 1 might have this camera. Thank You..



Answer
I love my Sony DSLR A100.

It has been rated at the best DSLR under $1,000 in several photography magazines, as well as being mentioned as winning Popular photographyâs âCamera of the Yearâ http://www.popphoto.com/popularphotographyfeatures/3440/the-camera-of-the-year-2006.html

From the article, âEnjoy the all-new Sony® α (alpha) DSLR-A100K camera with an amazing all-around lens to get you started. Included in this kit is the versatile new SAL-1870 lens. This standard lens easily handles the full range of shots youâll take most oftenâbut thereâs nothing âstandardâ about its advanced optical design. In 35mm equivalent, it covers wide-angle 27mm to 105mm midrange telephoto for snapshots, portraits, interiors and moreâan excellent all-around lens to travel with.

The Sony® α (alpha) DSLR-A100 camera is an instant classic: the top-quality 10 MP DSLR system camera that builds on a two-decade legacy of Minolta photographic leadership, accepts 20 years of A-mount lenses sold worldwideâand introduces Sony® imaging innovations like high-sensitivity shooting with Super SteadyShot® in-camera image stabilization, Dynamic Range Optimizer to automatically increase detail in bright and dark picture areas, new Anti-Dust technology to keep the CCD imager clean for better pictures, and Eye-Start® Autofocus system for faster camera response.â

Check out all the specs at the Sony website: http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?ProductSKU=DSLRA100K&Dept=cameras&CategoryName=dcc_DIDigitalSLRCameras_BodyandKits.

Some other reviews to look at too:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra100/
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/2417/hands-on-sony-alpha-100-dslr.html
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/SonyA100/index.shtml

Personally, I got the kit with the 18-70mm lens and the 75-200 lens. All for about $1,100. I love the camera. Iâve been using SLRâs for over 20 years, and after months of research, I chose the Sony. I have no regrets. I personally would get a larger memory card, nothing less than 2GB...but with that package, it's a deal.

Do your research, good luck, and I hope youâre happy with what you decide!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sunday, January 12, 2014

How would you rate the Sony Alpha A200 vs the Nikon D40x or D60?

sony dslr camera lens review on pcs DSLR camera Drawstring Soft Neoprene Lens Pouch Bag Cover for Sony ...
sony dslr camera lens review image



Justin H


I've been saving for a DSLR camera for a while now. I have been looking at the Nikon cameras, but I came across the Sony A200 in the same price category. The one review I read seemed to be very complementary, but it didn't compare it with any other brands.

With the Nikon cameras, is there any significant difference between the D40x and D60?



Answer
The D60 is the updated version of the D40X. It has one or two minor extras - scroll about 2/3rds down this page for a list: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond60/
And here's the final verdict: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond60/page30.asp

I'd prefer either one to the Sony A200.

In this review for the A200 they practically warn against using higher ISO settings and they suggest that you shoot in RAW (instead of jpg) even at ISO 100 for decent image quality... this is simply retarded: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra200/page31.asp
My other go-to review site is kinder towards the A200: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2008_reviews/sony_alpha200_pg6.html

Also, Nikon's selection of lenses and their upgrade path would steer me towards the D60. Then again, I personally use a Nikon D200 so you know, I could be biased ;-)

I'd consider the Nikon D60 vs. the Canon XSi, rather than the Sony A200. And between the D60 and the XSi, I'd simply get whichever one felt better in my hands - the specs and image quality are virtually identical.
---
added:
Thomas, wtf?
At stores the D40X is roughly $150 cheaper (both come with an 18-55mm kit lens... factor into that, that the D60 comes with a newer & better version of the 18-55mm zoom)
Also, I'm a great fan of Fhotoace myself but here his arguments don't make much sense:
if you're a pro, you wouldn't be looking at EITHER of these cameras.
And if you're an amateur, you wouldn't want to use about 95% of Nikon's lenses made since 1959 - most of them don't work properly on the entry level D60. For that (get a D80 or up to use the full range of AF lenses, or a D300 or up to meter with any of the older manual focus AI lenses.) With the D60 you do have a great selection of roughly 30 different AF-S and AF-I lenses. That should still be plenty for most amateurs.

What DSLR camera would you recommend me to buy?




MiZz RuBy


I need a new camera but am lost on which one to get!
I have my eye on Nikon D3100 or Canon 550D- any other suggestions?
Thanks in advance!



Answer
My other suggestion would be to look at the Sony SLT A55. This DSLR has Sony's Translucent Mirror Technology which allows for full-time continuous auto focus whether you're shooting still pictures or 1080/60i HD video. No other DSLR allows this. The technology also allows shooting at 10fps (frames per second) which is the fastest in its price range.The Sony SLT A55 also gives you 2D or 3D Sweep Panorama in the camera as well as HDR in the camera. It also has built-in GPS.

Here are some reviews:

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/AA55/AA55A.HTM

http://www.digitalphotographywriter.com/2010/08/sony-slt-a55-review-translucent-mirror.html

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony-a55-preview.shtml

Current prices at B&H - http://www.bhphotovideo.com

Nikon D3100 w/18-55mm zoom, $649.95 after a $50.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Ends 7-30-2011.

Canon 550D/T2i w/18-55mm zoom, $749.95 after a $50.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Ends 7-9-2011.

Sony SLT A55 w/18-55mm zoom, $799.99 after a $50.00 Instant Savings from B&H. Ends 7-9-2011.

All 3 cameras have free USA shipping.

With its built-in focusing motor and Sony's version of Image Stabilization in the camera body and use of the legacy Minolta Maxxum "A" lens mount the SLT A55 can use the Legacy Minolta Maxxum AF lenses dating back to 1985 and they will auto focus and become, in effect, IS lenses.

The Nikon D3100 requires the more expensive Nikon AF-S lenses if you want them to auto focus.

Canon and Nikon have their respective versions of IS in some but not all of their lenses plus you pay for it over and over. A Minolta Maxxum AF 50mm f1.4 prime lens on the A55 will be an IS lens. Neither Nikon nor Canon offers an IS 50mm prime lens.

In my opinion the Sony SLT A55 offers technology and features that Nikon and Canon lack. Its only a matter of time before Canon and Nikon will have to respond by upgrading their technology to match that of the Sony A55.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers