Showing posts with label best canon telephoto lens for sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best canon telephoto lens for sports. Show all posts

Sunday, May 25, 2014

WHAT KIND OF SLR LENS SHOULD I GET?




yeahh.


im looking for a telephoto lens for my canon to shoot sports.. im not sure which one to get i don't want to spend more then 200 though...
helppp helpp helppp
i know you can get lenses cheaper on certain websites, used.. shooting motocross paintball etc..



Answer
A Canon obviously.

Look for a 70-300 mm lens, but you will have to spend more than $200, closer to $650. There is a less expensive 75-300 mm for $200, but is does not have IS or USM something you will want if your goal is to shoot sports

The 300 mm lens I use cost me over $6,000.

I am a sports photographer

f/4 budget telephoto lens for sports photography?




APKINS


I am using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i and looking for a budget telephoto lens under $500 with good picture quality. My eyes is currently on the Tamron SP 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD. The review people said it focuses fast, great image stabilization and great image quality with some CA. The thing that bothers me is, some people said that I would need a f/2.8 lens for sports photography and a f/4-5.6 is not suitable for fast shutter speed needs. A f/2.8 would be lovely but I have to take into consideration of my lightweight kit for travel and my limited budget, $500. How bad is f/4-5.6 going to be? Or will it be fine? Let's say a nighttime football match light up with the stadium floodlights or a concert, will it be fine and capable of speedy shutter speeds?


Answer
In daylight conditions the lighting should be good enough for the lens. But in low light, it is going to struggle. The difference between f/2.8 and 5.6 is 2 f-stops.

You have to compare it to f/5.6 rather than f/4.5 as the lens will be at f/5.6 at 300mm.

Take your camera, and put it into shutter or aperture priority. Take a photo. Then without changing anything else, find the exposure compensation on your camera and set it to -2EV and take another photo.

Then compare the two photos and you will see how much less light the f/5.6 setting will let in than the f/2.8. Then imagine if this was at night time, and you will have your answer.

Also consider shutter speed with that lens. Using the old conventional rule-of-thumb, the shutter speed should be 1/300 of a sec minimum, just to correct any camera shake. You could use a monopod, but you are also having to compensate for action, so you will not be able to get less than 1/125 sec for any kind of sharp photos.

The problem is that sports or any action photography, especially at night, really tax the equipment. The reason that there are big, expensive lenses is that they are the only ones that will do the job.

Your best bet is a $850 Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8. It is a little shorter in the focal length, but it is a pro-speed lens, and will work with low-light situations a lot better than the Tamron.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Telephoto lens for indoor sporting events...?







Can you recomend a good lens for capturing high-speed action in a gym? I have a film Canon Elan. I'd like pictures of high enough quality to hang on my wall, but I don't want to break the bank. It seems that lenses are either several thousands of dollars, or cheap junk. I'm not sure what exactly I'm looking for so any suggestion is welcome. I'm thinking, it would be ~f2.8 and >50mm. I don't know what a good length would be. The action will probably be about 30 - 50 feet from me, and I want the competitors to fill the frame. It needs to have an aperature large enough to compensate for gymnasium lighting.

Is there a good lens under $400 (better under $350) that will fit my Elan and produce great sports pictures?

Do I just need to be a better photographer???



Answer
The Elan 7E is a decent Canon EOS film SLR capable of handling any of the Canon EF lenses, but not the EF-s lenses made for "crop" dSLR cameras. For indoor sports photography, you're going to need fast film (ISO1600 at least) and fast lenses to get the required shutter speeds.

(A quick aside about shutter speeds: For capturing "action" shots where the subject will fill a reasonable amount of frame, you're going to need at least 1/500th of a second or faster shutter speed. If you have to do 1/400th, you'll see some motion blur, but that might be acceptable to you. Even at 1/500th, you'll relatively freeze the players, but any ball may show motion blur.)

For indoor sports (I'm assuming basketball, volleyball, maybe wrestling), you're going to want a fast focus and wide open (f/2.8 or better, with f/2 preferred) aperture. This means mostly prime lenses, except for expensive zooms.

A bunch of choices, in increasing focal length:

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (AKA "thrifty fifty") is a lightweight, inexpensive ($80!) lens that can really help out if you have a low budget. I own this lens, and it's nice to carry in a jacket pocket "just in case." However, it has a standard autofocus motor, so it's not all that fast of focus, but good enough for slow-paced action like free-throws or a volleyball serve. It's a bit short, but doable in a pinch. It's an all-plastic body and feels flimsy, so don't give it too hard of a time. Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM (AKA "nifty fifty") is a great lens with fast ultrasonic motor (USM) focusing and an all-metal body. Heavier than the f/1.8 above, it still suffers from a short focal length. You can get this for around $300 usually. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that you'd think would be great for indoor sports... except that it's not all that fast of a focus and not made for sports. For over $1000, I'm including it just for completion. Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM is a fantastic lens with fast USM focusing, a decent focal length (perfect for portraits, btw), with a nice, fast aperture. I know several professional photographers that shoot basketball (HS, college, and some NBA) with this lens on their main camera (HS, college) or backup (NBA). I own this lens, and it's on my camera 70% of the time for indoor soccer. It is, however, a bit too short for my soccer fields, and a longer lens is planned. You can get this for around $350 usually. Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM is another pro-series "L" that sounds great, but WAAAAY too slow to focus. At over $1200, you'd think it'd be good for sports, but alas, it's not. Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM is a fantastic lens, but is often either too short or too long. At $460, it's close to your budget, and may work out.
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that is reputed to be one of the best lenses ever made by Canon. For $900, it doesn't meet your budgetary requirements, but I would be amiss not mentioning this. If you want one of the best indoor sports lenses, this is on the short list. Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM is another pro-series "L" but more reasonable and a staple of indoor sports shooters. New, this lens is around $650, but attainable used for around $500. At f/2.8, it's a bit slower than the previous lenses, but doable. If you really like the 200mm focal length and really really REALLY want a faster lens, you can always attempt to find the... Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM lens, which has been out of production for years, and used lenses go for over $2500 last I checked. The price is simply supply and demand. There is a heavy demand (professional NBA photographers, gymnastics photographers, etc.) and not much supply. This is a dream lens for me, but I can't rationalize the purchase at this time. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM is a zoom lens that is reported to be one of the optically best zoom lenses in the history of Canon. At $1100, it's a bit out of range, but well worth looking at. If you have $600 more available, look at the IS version with Image Stabilization. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO HSM is Sigma's entry similar to the Canon zoom above. At $900, it's $200 cheaper and still a very nice lens. The images tend to run a bit cool, though, so you may need your lab to provide some slight color correction.
I recommend using your current zoom to figure out at what focal length you're more likely to need by just framing the shot and taking a note as to the focal length. I'm sure you'll see that you're often close to one of the prime lenses listed above.

I hope that's a good list for beginning. If you want to talk lenses more, drop me a private message.

As for buying lenses, take a look here (Amazon) which really is a portal for www.adorama.com, which is a very reputable camera store. Also, check out www.bhphotovideo.com which is another top-notch store with often the lowest prices around.

Telephoto lens for indoor sporting events...?




cerbberi


Can you recomend a good lens for capturing high-speed action in a gym? I have a film Canon Elan. I'd like pictures of high enough quality to hang on my wall, but I don't want to break the bank. It seems that lenses are either several thousands of dollars, or cheap junk. I'm not sure what exactly I'm looking for so any suggestion is welcome. I'm thinking, it would be ~f2.8 and >50mm. I don't know what a good length would be. The action will probably be about 30 - 50 feet from me, and I want the competitors to fill the frame. It needs to have an aperature large enough to compensate for gymnasium lighting.

Is there a good lens under $400 (better under $350) that will fit my Elan and produce great sports pictures?

Do I just need to be a better photographer???



Answer
The Elan 7E is a decent Canon EOS film SLR capable of handling any of the Canon EF lenses, but not the EF-s lenses made for "crop" dSLR cameras. For indoor sports photography, you're going to need fast film (ISO1600 at least) and fast lenses to get the required shutter speeds.

(A quick aside about shutter speeds: For capturing "action" shots where the subject will fill a reasonable amount of frame, you're going to need at least 1/500th of a second or faster shutter speed. If you have to do 1/400th, you'll see some motion blur, but that might be acceptable to you. Even at 1/500th, you'll relatively freeze the players, but any ball may show motion blur.)

For indoor sports (I'm assuming basketball, volleyball, maybe wrestling), you're going to want a fast focus and wide open (f/2.8 or better, with f/2 preferred) aperture. This means mostly prime lenses, except for expensive zooms.

A bunch of choices, in increasing focal length:

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (AKA "thrifty fifty") is a lightweight, inexpensive ($80!) lens that can really help out if you have a low budget. I own this lens, and it's nice to carry in a jacket pocket "just in case." However, it has a standard autofocus motor, so it's not all that fast of focus, but good enough for slow-paced action like free-throws or a volleyball serve. It's a bit short, but doable in a pinch. It's an all-plastic body and feels flimsy, so don't give it too hard of a time. Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM (AKA "nifty fifty") is a great lens with fast ultrasonic motor (USM) focusing and an all-metal body. Heavier than the f/1.8 above, it still suffers from a short focal length. You can get this for around $300 usually. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that you'd think would be great for indoor sports... except that it's not all that fast of a focus and not made for sports. For over $1000, I'm including it just for completion. Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM is a fantastic lens with fast USM focusing, a decent focal length (perfect for portraits, btw), with a nice, fast aperture. I know several professional photographers that shoot basketball (HS, college, and some NBA) with this lens on their main camera (HS, college) or backup (NBA). I own this lens, and it's on my camera 70% of the time for indoor soccer. It is, however, a bit too short for my soccer fields, and a longer lens is planned. You can get this for around $350 usually. Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM is another pro-series "L" that sounds great, but WAAAAY too slow to focus. At over $1200, you'd think it'd be good for sports, but alas, it's not. Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM is a fantastic lens, but is often either too short or too long. At $460, it's close to your budget, and may work out.
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM is a pro-series "L" lens that is reputed to be one of the best lenses ever made by Canon. For $900, it doesn't meet your budgetary requirements, but I would be amiss not mentioning this. If you want one of the best indoor sports lenses, this is on the short list. Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM is another pro-series "L" but more reasonable and a staple of indoor sports shooters. New, this lens is around $650, but attainable used for around $500. At f/2.8, it's a bit slower than the previous lenses, but doable. If you really like the 200mm focal length and really really REALLY want a faster lens, you can always attempt to find the... Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM lens, which has been out of production for years, and used lenses go for over $2500 last I checked. The price is simply supply and demand. There is a heavy demand (professional NBA photographers, gymnastics photographers, etc.) and not much supply. This is a dream lens for me, but I can't rationalize the purchase at this time. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM is a zoom lens that is reported to be one of the optically best zoom lenses in the history of Canon. At $1100, it's a bit out of range, but well worth looking at. If you have $600 more available, look at the IS version with Image Stabilization. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO HSM is Sigma's entry similar to the Canon zoom above. At $900, it's $200 cheaper and still a very nice lens. The images tend to run a bit cool, though, so you may need your lab to provide some slight color correction.
I recommend using your current zoom to figure out at what focal length you're more likely to need by just framing the shot and taking a note as to the focal length. I'm sure you'll see that you're often close to one of the prime lenses listed above.

I hope that's a good list for beginning. If you want to talk lenses more, drop me a private message.

As for buying lenses, take a look here (Amazon) which really is a portal for www.adorama.com, which is a very reputable camera store. Also, check out www.bhphotovideo.com which is another top-notch store with often the lowest prices around.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Which telephoto lens would be best for me?

best canon telephoto lens for sports on ... Canon Zoom Telephoto Ef 75 300mm F 4 0 5 6 Iii Autofocus Lens 6473a003
best canon telephoto lens for sports image



massmama


I have the Canon Rebel XS with the kit lens and I want to buy a telephoto lens.

I need help sorting out all the lingo. For example, what is DG, and whats the difference between f/4.0-5.6 IS and f/4.0-5.6 III? Canon vs Sigma?

I will mostly be shooting people, sports and occasionally landscapes.



Answer
Personally I would stick with a Canon lens over Sigma. Third party lenses are rarely as good as the Canon lenses. Also camera companies design their lenses with future technology in mind. They do not release this information to third party makers . There is a good chance that sometime in the future the third party lenses will no longer work correctly with new cameras.

The lingo means the following.

DG: Is Sigma's designation for digital only lenses. These lenses are designed to be used exclusively on digital cameras with APS-C sized sensors like your Rebel. They will not work on full frame digitals or film cameras.

F4.0-5.6 IS means the lens is a variable aperture lens with image stabilization. The max aperture changes from F4 at the wide end of the zoom to F5.6 when zoom all the way out. On a 70-300mm lens the max aperture will be F4.0 at 70mm and F5.6 at 300mm.

F4.0-5.6 III means that it is a variable aperture zoom and that is the 3rd addition of the lens.

For Canon telephoto zooms I would look at either of these two.

Canon EF 70-300mm F4.0-5.6 IS about $600

Canon EFs 55-250 F4.0-5.6 IS about $250

The 70-300mm III is not really a very good lens. You would be better off spending a few dollars more and getting the 55-250 over this lens.

Which Canon t2i value pack would be more worth my money?




hellomichi


I am planning on buying the new Canon t2i and Best Buy has two separate packages available.
One includes an extra 75-300mm Zoom Lens and the other includes an extra 55-250mm f/4-5.6 Telephoto Zoom Lens. The telephoto lense is a little more money but only by like $100
I was wondering if anyone could tell me the differences between the lenses and which one would be more worth my time, if either.

Thanks!



Answer
I would go w the 75-300mm zoom. I have a Canon Rebel and the 75-300mm Zoom

Factor on the camera is 1.6, so 1.6 times length of your lens gives you the effective length.

18-55 becomes 28 to 88

75-300 becomes 120 to 480

Unless you need a wide angle lens, or a macro lens, you pretty much have it covered.

18-55 general photography and landscapes
75-300 sports, and things you can't (don't want) to get close too.
wide angle - journalism. get the big picture
macro - real closeup work
80- to 105 portraits (use high end of 18-55 (28-88), or low end of 75-300(120-480)




Powered by Yahoo! Answers